Sympathizing with Social Justice: Poetry of Invitation and Generation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18432/ari29243Keywords:
social justice, poetry, politics, imagination, liminal studioAbstract
In this paper, we use Sameshima’s Parallaxic Praxis Model to create collaborative poetry. The model invites juxtaposing articulations to generate alternative thinking. Similar to Daignault's (1992) notion of a “thinking maybe" space, we invite readers into what we call a liminal studio to theorize new understandings of social justice. In the data phases for this project, Viet Thanh Nguyen’s (2015) The Sympathizer served as a play object: The narrator, the sympathizer, is a captured communist spy in the aftermath of the Vietnam war, and his confession (the novel) considers a critical question for understanding social justice: “What is more important than independence and freedom?” Nguyen refuses simplistic overtures of social justice. Instead, readers are confronted with questions: “What do those who struggle against power do when they seize power? What does the revolutionary do when the revolution triumphs? Why do those who call for independence and freedom take away the independence and freedom of others?” (p. 178). These questions lead us to the frame of our own ten-part poem, the modern scholar under interrogation. Our poetry reframes social justice as the art of being/nothing, the something of nothingness being a language of resistance for a reimagined politics.References
Aoki, D. S. (2000). The thing never speaks for itself: Lacan and the politics of clarity. Harvard Educational Review, 70(3), 347-369. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.70.3.83729226065nxq27
Barthes, R. (1996). From work to text. In P. Rice & P. Waugh (Eds.), Modern literary theory. New York, NY: Arnold.
Beatty, P. (2015). The sellout. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Bruner, J. (2002). Life as narrative. Social Research, 71(3), 691-710. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40970444
Daignault, J. (1983). Curriculum and action-research: An artistic activity in a perverse way. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 5(3), 4-28.
Daignault, J. (1992, October). Serenity. Paper presented at the Bergamo Conference, Dayton, OH.
den Heyer, K., & Conrad, D. (2011). Using Alain Badiou’s ethic of truths to support an ‘eventful’ social justice teacher education program. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 27(1), 7-19. Retrieved from http://journal.jctonline.org/index.php/jct/article/view/302
Hall, S. (1973). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. Birmingham, England: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology, and other essays. New York, NY: Garland.
Nguyen, V. T. (2015). The sympathizer. New York, NY: Grove Press.
Pinar, W. F. (2010). Notes on a blue guitar. Journal of Educational Controversy, 5(1), 1-9. Retrieved from http://cedar.wwu.edu/jec/vol5/iss1/18
Sameshima, P., & Irwin, R. (2008). Rendering dimensions of a liminal currere. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 5(2), 1-15. Retrieved from http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/tci/article/view/28
Sameshima, P., & Vandermause, R. (2008). Parallaxic praxis: An artful interdisciplinary collaborative research methodology. In B. Kožuh, R. Kahn & A. Kozlowska (Eds.), The practical science of society (pp. 141-152). Grand Forks, Nottingham, Krakow: The College of Education and Human Development & Slovenian Research Agency (AARS).
Sameshima, P., Wiebe, S., & Hayes, M. (in press). Imagination: The generation of possibility. In B. Andrews (Ed.), Perspectives on arts education research in Canada.
Schubert, W. (2010). Journeys of expansion and synopsis: Tensions in books that shaped curriculum inquiry, 1968–present. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(1), 17–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2009.00468.x
Stern, J. (2000). Metaphor in context. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yale book of quotations (2006). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Art/Research International agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication and the right to sublicense the Contribution, in the form in which it is published by the journal, to others under the terms and conditions of the of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) that allows others to download the work and share the work with others with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, but they cannot change the work in any way or use any part of the work commercially.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive public distribution and display of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
d. Authors wishing to include items (such as images or other media, or any creative works of others whether previously published or not) must contact the original copyright holder to obtain explicit permission to publish these items in Art/Research International. Writing permission should include: the title(s) of any copyrighted work, original place of publication if applicable, and an acknowledgement of having read Art/Research International's copyright notice. Authors are responsible for obtaining this permission and keeping it in their own records for later verification.