Analysis of Reference re Supreme Court Act: The Implied Currency Requirement for Quebec Seat Appointees to the Supreme Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21991/C97H56Abstract
The Supreme Court of Canada, in a 6-1 judgment in March 2014, ruled that an appointee to
one of the three Quebec seats on the Supreme Court must be either a current Quebec Superior
Court judge or a current Quebec lawyer of at least ten years’ standing. Reference re Supreme
Court Act, ss. 5 and 6 [Reference] determined that the phrase “from among” in section 6 of the Supreme Court Act [Act] implies that Supreme Court appointees to the reserved Quebec seats must be current members of one of the designated Quebec legal institutions. The judgment also affi rmed that any change to the composition of the Supreme Court, including the eligibility conditions of appointees, is constitutionally protected. A synthesis of textual, contextual, and purposive analysis is hereinaft er used to review the Reference.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Constitutional Forum constitutionnel grant the journal the right of first publication, and agree to license the work under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) that allows others to share the work for non-commercial purposes, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, as long as no changes are made to the original work. Please use this format to attribute this work to Constitutional Forum constitutionnel:
"First published as: Title of Article, Contributor, Constitutional Forum constitutionnel Volume/Issue, Copyright © [year], Publisher"