The Notwithstanding Clause and the New Populism
The following article asks whether the notwithstanding clause contained in Canada’s Constitution Act, 1982 [Constitution Act]1 remains defensible where populists are in power. It ultimately dismisses two conventional justifications of the clause — one based on a principle of interinstitutional dialogue, one based on a majoritarian principle of legislative supremacy — before briefly considering possible amendments to the clause that may render it justifiable in a populist context (or more generally, where the political convention against using section 33 substantially weakens).
Authors who publish with Constitutional Forum constitutionnel grant the journal the right of first publication, and agree to license the work under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) that allows others to share the work for non-commercial purposes, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, as long as no changes are made to the original work. Please use this format to attribute this work to Constitutional Forum constitutionnel:
"First published as: Title of Article, Contributor, Constitutional Forum constitutionnel Volume/Issue, Copyright © [year], Publisher"