Notwithstanding the Backbench: Section 33 in Non-Government Bills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21991/cf29507Abstract
This article will not address the mechanics of notwithstanding clause, the arguments for and against its use, or how courts should approach its invocation — all of this has received extensive academic attention. Rather, the purpose of this article is to fill a narrow gap in the literature regarding the history of federal non-government bills introduced with a notwithstanding clause based on publicly available information. It will do so in three parts: first, it will briefly present some relevant parliamentary vocabulary and concepts; second, it will review the individual bills at issue, sorted by theme; and finally, it will conclude with brief comments and directions for future research.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Charlie Feldman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Constitutional Forum constitutionnel grant the journal the right of first publication, and agree to license the work under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) that allows others to share the work for non-commercial purposes, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, as long as no changes are made to the original work. Please use this format to attribute this work to Constitutional Forum constitutionnel:
"First published as: Title of Article, Contributor, Constitutional Forum constitutionnel Volume/Issue, Copyright © [year], Publisher"


