Evidence Summary
Teenagers’
Public Library Needs are Difficult to Determine
A
Review of:
Howard,
V. (2011). What do young teens think about the public library? The Library Quarterly, 81(3), 321-344.
URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/660134
Reviewed
by:
Jason Martin
Associate Librarian
University of Central Florida
Libraries
Orlando, Florida, United States of
America
Email: jason.martin@ucf.edu
Received: 3
Oct. 2011 Accepted: 14 Dec. 2011
2012 Martin. This is an Open Access article
distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons‐Attribution‐Noncommercial‐Share Alike License 2.5 Canada (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by‐nc‐sa/2.5/ca/),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly attributed, not used for commercial
purposes, and, if transformed, the resulting work is redistributed under the
same or similar license to this one.
Abstract
Objective
– To
discover the attitudes of twelve to fifteen year-olds toward the public
library.
Design
– Mixed
methodology consisting of a survey and focus groups.
Setting
– An Eastern Canadian regional
municipality.
Subjects
– Twelve
to fifteen year-old middle school students.
Methods
– Using
a disproportionate stratified sample and multistage clustering, the author
mailed 900 surveys to middle school students; 249 surveys were completed and
usable. Those students who completed the survey and who also indicated they
would be willing to participate in a focus group were randomly selected to
participate in nine focus groups with between 7 to 12 students in each group.
Main
Results – Discrepancies
exist between the teens’ level of satisfaction with the library indicated on
the survey (high) and expressed in the focus groups (low). Teens seldom use the
public library due to: their non-existent relationship with library staff,
although teens who were “active readers” used the library more; lack of
appealing programs and program promotion; no teen-focused website; poor teen
facilities within the library; and an overall failure of the public libraries
to include teenagers.
Conclusion
– Public
libraries need to be more responsive to teen needs to attract teens to use the
library. To uncover these needs, libraries should use mixed methods of
discovery.
Commentary
Teenagers inhabit a world of their
own; they are too old to be a child and too young to be an adult. Being caught
between these two periods of life can be stressful and frustrating for
teenagers. This “unbelonging” extends to public libraries, which focus almost
exclusively either on pre-teen children or on adult users. Public libraries
must do a better job of meeting the needs of teen users to encourage lifelong
library use. However, little research
has been done examining the library needs of teenagers. Vivian Howard attempts
to add to the small quantity of research on teen user needs with her
mixed-methods study of middle school students aged 12 to 15 in an Eastern
Canadian municipality. The survey results indicate teens use the library very
little, but that they are highly satisfied with the level of service they
receive. The results from the focus groups, however, show a much lower level of
satisfaction with the public library.
Howard uses the findings of several
previous studies of teens and libraries to frame her study and to determine
what areas of library services should be targeted. The focus groups were used
to enhance the survey findings and appeared to focus solely on the previously
identified areas of library service. Qualitative research should be a time for
exploration that may very well lead to insights and discoveries outside the
original frame. A less rigid approach to the focus groups may have yielded
service problems or praise which lay outside the previous studies’ findings.
Howard does not indicate whether she used SPSS or another statistical software
package to analyze the survey results, or whether the focus group results were
analyzed by hand or through the use of a program like NVivo. Nor does she
provide the full survey, focus group question guide, or a code sheet used for
analysis of the focus group results.
The study is well-designed and
well-written, and adds to the scant literature on teen public library needs.
However, Howard only presents her findings and offers no suggestions for ways
in which public libraries may improve their practices. Her assertion libraries
must use mixed-methods to uncover teen needs seems flawed considering the wide
differences between her survey results and focus group findings. Perhaps adding
a third method, such as observation, would help to triangulate the results and
thus provide more concrete discoveries.