Editorial
Looking
Forwards and Looking Back
Alison
Brettle
Editor-in-Chief
Senior
Lecturer, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Salford
Salford,
United Kingdom
Email:
a.brettle@salford.ac.uk
2012
Brettle. This is an
Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons‐Attribution‐Noncommercial‐Share Alike License 2.5 Canada (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by‐nc‐sa/2.5/ca/), which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work
is properly attributed, not used for commercial purposes, and, if transformed,
the resulting work is redistributed under the same or similar license to this
one.
Welcome
to the seventh volume of Evidence Based
Library and Information Practice. This is my first issue in my new role of
Editor-in-Chief, and I’m honoured and delighted to take over the position. As
many of you may know, I’ve been involved with the journal almost since its
inception, primarily as Associate Editor (Articles). During that time, I’ve
sincerely enjoyed working with the supportive EBLIP team, as well as many authors throughout the world, and I’m
looking forward to continuing that work in my new role.
Spring
is traditionally a time of new growth and change, and the EBLIP journal is no different. In the last issue, Denise
Koufogiannakis reflected on how the journal had grown and developed during its
first 6 years, and I look forward to contributing to its continued success.
There have been a number of changes in the editorial team. I welcome Wayne
Jones from Carleton University, Canada, who has taken over as Associate Editor
(Articles) and brings a wealth of editorial experience. Heather Pretty has
taken over as lead copyeditor and is joining our editorial meetings to help ensure
the continued quality and consistency of the journal. As part of quality
assurance and development, the editorial team is examining and revising our
journal guidelines, so look for those in forthcoming months. Our former
Editor-in-Chief, Denise Koufogiannakis, is developing a new role as Associate
Editor (Reviews). As a keen advocate of reviews for providing evidence,
developing skills for research and evidence based practice, and documenting and
establishing an evidence base for our profession, I’m looking forward to the
first review which is likely to be published in the next issue. Too much change
can be disruptive, so I’m pleased that both Lorie Kloda and Jonathan Eldredge are maintaining their positions as Associate
Editors for Evidence Summaries and Classics, respectively.
When
starting something new, it is often useful to look back (to build on experience
or make sure we don’t make the same mistakes!). When I looked back on my own
evidence based library and information practice journey, I realized it began in
the mid 1990’s, certainly before I was even aware that the phrase had been
coined. I’ve never worked in a library, and my first professional post was as
an information specialist within a research unit that supported evidence based
health care. I knew little about research and even less about evidence based
practice, I clung to the hope that I knew something about being an information professional! A long time academic, my
manager championed library and information professionals believing they had a
key role to play in the evidence based practice movement – whether by finding
information, developing information products, or helping others to find
information for practice. Furthermore, he encouraged me to examine my own
practice, and when there were no answers to some of the problems we came
across, to research, evaluate, and write about it. This encouragement resulted
in my first forays into being an evidence based library and information
practitioner (Brettle, Long, Grant, & Greenhalgh, 1998; Brettle &
Long, 2001). I challenge you to do the same; you never know where it may lead.
Much
of the debate about Evidence Based Library and Information Practice has been
about its name (e.g., Booth, 2003), its definition (e.g., Booth, 2003), the
evidence (e.g., Crumley and Koufogiannakis, 2003 and Eldredge, 2004), and most recently, whether it has a future
or whether we should all retire (Booth, 2011). For me, EBLIP is not about the
name; it is about what we do, how we behave, and how the library and information
profession can have a continued future. (And in case you’re wondering, I’m not
about to retire). Our professional roles are all about evidence (in its various
forms). The contexts in which we work are changing, but as a profession we have
skills that make us good at dealing with research, information, knowledge, or
evidence (for example, organizing, writing, or searching). It therefore makes
sense that we build evidence based approaches into our working lives. We can
use these approaches to transfer our knowledge to different contexts and
demonstrate our value and worth to employers. This may take various forms –
critically reading a paper to get new ideas, seeking out like minded colleagues
to discuss their approach to a problem, evaluating a service or testing
alternative approaches so that we work in the most effective and efficient way,
and so on.
The
purpose of the journal is to “provide a forum for librarians and other
information professionals to discover research that may contribute to decision
making in professional practice.” It does this in a number of ways which I hope
encourage you, our readers, to incorporate evidence based approaches into your
working lives. Evidence summaries seek to provide practitioners with a user
friendly overview of research that they can use in their decision making,
articles focus on generating EBLIP related research, the Using Evidence in
Practice section focuses on the practical use of evidence, and finally, the
commentaries provide a forum for debate. Over the past 6 years I have watched
and contributed to the journal’s development and seen its impact on
professional practice. I look forward to contributing to its future and hope
that you will continue to give it your support.
References
Booth,
A. (2003). Bridging the research-practice gap? The role of evidence
based librarianship. New
Review of Information & Library Research, 9(1), 3-23. doi:10.1080/13614550410001687909
Booth,
A. (2011) Is there a future for evidence based library
and information practice? Evidence Based
Library and Information Practice, 6(4),
22-27.
Brettle,
A. J., & Long, A. F. (2001). Comparison of bibliographic databases for information on the
rehabilitation of people with severe mental illness. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association,
89(4), 353-362.
Brettle, A. J., Long, A. F., Grant, M. J., & Greenhalgh, J. (1998). Searching for information on outcomes:
do you need to be comprehensive? Quality
in Health Care, 7(3), 163-167.
Crumley, E., & Koufogiannakis, D. (2002). Developing evidence-based librarianship:
practical steps for implementation. Health Information & Libraries Journal,
19(2), 61. doi:10.1046/j.1471-1842.2002.00372.x
Eldredge, J. D. (2004). Inventory of research methods
for librarianship and informatics. Journal
of the Medical Library Association, 92(1), 83-90.