Guest Editorial
EBLIP and Public Libraries
Pam Ryan
Director, Library Services
Edmonton Public Library
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Email: pryan@epl.ca
2012 Ryan. This is an
Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons‐Attribution‐Noncommercial‐Share Alike License 2.5 Canada (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by‐nc‐sa/2.5/ca/), which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work
is properly attributed, not used for commercial purposes, and, if transformed,
the resulting work is redistributed under the same or similar license to this
one.
Kudos to the Evidence
Based Library and Information Practice editorial team for planning this
special issue focused on public libraries. This issue features research
articles from LIS faculty and public library practitioners on timely and
important topics: the use of volunteers in public libraries; using customer
experience data to inform service practice; the efficacy of a Web-based
training program; a study on the contributions and value of public libraries;
and an evidence based collection analysis process. All of the evidence
summaries in this issue also focus on public library issues. Public librarians
may be less familiar with these critical appraisals of research articles, their
use as another tool to facilitate knowledge translation from research, and as
another source of evidence with which to make informed decisions.
EBLIP is one area where librarians from every sector can
work together, sharing a common interest in evidence
based professional practice. EBLIP at its best puts aside sector silos and
offers a broad perspective for our work in all library types. The EBLIP
conference is inclusive of all library types and Evidence Based Library and Information Practice has always included
articles and evidence summaries from across the spectrum of academic, public,
school, health, and other special libraries in its mission to provide a forum
for librarians and information professionals to discover research that may
contribute to decision making in professional practice.
Despite this welcome inclusion in EBLIP, public librarian
participation is notably low. This mirrors the grim reality of low public
librarian research and publication rates, as well as the small overall
percentage of LIS research articles about public library practice. The results
of a content analysis study (Penta, 2005) showed that
over a four year period just 3% of article authors in North American LIS
journals were employed in public libraries. Even in Public Library Quarterly, only 14% of the authors were public
librarians (Penta, 2005). An earlier study that
reviewed the state of research in North American LIS journals about public
libraries over a five year period showed that only 7% of LIS research articles
were public library oriented (Hersberger, 2001).
It isn’t surprising that public librarian research and
publication rates are lower than that of their academic librarian and LIS
faculty colleagues. Public librarians do not share the same research tradition,
mandate, or requirement as our academic colleagues. However, the LIS literature
and overall evidence base of LIS suffers from this lack of contribution from
our public library practitioners and lack of information about our public
library practice. EBLIP practitioners should be concerned about the overall
quality and representativeness of the LIS literature and should consider strategies
that can help balance sector specific research and publication efforts. While
public librarians do make significant use of local data to inform
organizational decision making, further encouragement and opportunity is needed
to take the additional step of publishing these evidence based approaches with
the LIS community. The “Using Evidence in Practice” section of Evidence Based Library and Information
Practice is a good example of a forum that public librarians should
consider for these types of publications.
While the barriers to EBLIP are applicable across all sector
types and are well documented (Booth, 2011), specific attention is required to
engage public librarians. Orientation to EBLIP as a model of practice is needed
first, and secondly, support and attention is needed to assist in overcoming
the barriers to participation. Now, more than ever, with fiscal pressures and
societal changes challenging the value of our public libraries, we need a
strong base of evidence upon which to draw support and inform evidence based
practice and advocacy efforts. The evidence base needs increased contributions
about public library practice and value from both LIS faculty and
practitioner-researchers to ensure balance and relevance.
While attention and commitment from organizations,
associations, and practitioners are all required to implement change, the
expertise and leadership from within our EBLIP community could also be
harnessed to provide an engagement and support framework to further engage
public librarians to our community. Further opportunity and welcome into the
EBLIP community could be encouraged through even small steps, such as ensuring
there are public librarians on the conference organizing and local arrangement
committees, and an EBLIP editorial position dedicated to seeking out and
working with public librarians to encourage and support publication. The EBLIP
community can further support our public library colleagues by working
collaboratively on projects, such as helping to define the research questions
of most pressing concern for public libraries.
In my former position as an academic librarian, I often
heard the opinion that EBLIP was perceived to be just for and about health
librarians and health libraries. EBLIP has grown so much that we know this is
no longer true, but there is still work to be done. The number of public librarians in our ranks
is still discouraging. We need to work together, reach out and provide
opportunities, and share our EBLIP experience to engage more of our public
library colleagues.
Special thanks to the editorial team of Evidence Based Library and Information Practice for providing this
forum for publication and discussion.
References
Booth,
A. (2011). Barriers and facilitators to evidence-based library and information
practice: An international perspective. Perspectives in International Librarianship, 2011(1). doi:10.5339/pil.2011.1
Hersberger,
J., & Demas, C. (2001). The current state of public
library research in select peer-reviewed journals: 1996-2000. North
Carolina Libraries, 59(1), 10-14. Retrieved 28 Feb. 2012 from http://www.ncl.ecu.edu/index.php/NCL/article/viewFile/288/306
Penta,
M., & McKenzie, P. (2005). The big gap remains: Public
librarians as authors in LIS journals, 1999-2003. Public Library Quarterly, 24(1), 33-46. doi:10.1300/J118v24n01_04