Evidence
Summary
Younger Adults
Derive Pleasure and Utilitarian Benefits from Browsing for Music Information
Seeking in Physical and Digital Spaces
A Review of:
Laplante,
A., & Downie, J. S. (2011). The utilitarian and hedonic outcomes of music information-seeking
in everyday life. Library & Information Science Research, 33,
202-210. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2010.11.002
Reviewed by:
Diana
K. Wakimoto
Online
Literacy Librarian, California State University, East Bay
Doctoral
Student, San Jose-QUT Gateway Program
Hayward,
California, United States of America
Email:
diana.wakimoto@csueastbay.edu
Received: 18 Apr. 2012 Accepted: 11 June 2012
2012 Wakimoto. This is an
Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons‐Attribution‐Noncommercial‐Share
Alike License 2.5 Canada (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ca/), which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly attributed, not used for commercial
purposes, and, if transformed, the resulting work is redistributed under the
same or similar license to this one.
Abstract
Objective – This
study’s objective was to identify the utilitarian and hedonic features of
satisfying music information seeking experiences from the perspective of
younger adults when using physical and digital music information retrieval
(MIR) systems in their daily lives.
Design – In-depth,
semi-structured interviews.
Setting – Large
public library in Montreal, Canada.
Subjects – 15
French-speaking younger adults, 10 males and 5 females (aged 18 to 29 years,
mean age of 24 years).
Methods – A pre-test
was completed to test the interview guide. The guide was divided into five
sections asking the participants questions about their
music tastes, how music fit into their daily lives, how they discovered music,
what music information sources were used and how they were used, what made
their experiences satisfying, and their biographical information. Participants
were recruited between April 1, 2006 and August 8, 2007 following maximum
variation sampling for the main study. Recruitment stopped when data saturation
was reached and no new themes arose during analysis. Interviews were recorded
and the transcripts were analyzed via constant comparative method (CCM) to
determine themes and patterns.
Main Results – The
researchers found that both utilitarian and hedonic factors contributed to
satisfaction with music information seeking experiences for the young adults.
Utilitarian factors were divided between two main categories: finding music and
finding information about music. Finding information about music could be
further divided into three sub-categories: increasing cultural knowledge and
social acceptance through increased knowledge about music, enriching the
listening experience by finding information about the artist and the music, and
gathering information to help with future music purchases including information
that would help the participants recommend music to others. Hedonic outcomes
that contributed to satisfying information seeking experiences included
deriving pleasure and feeling engaged while searching or browsing for music.
Especially satisfying experiences were those where the participants felt highly
engaged in the process and found new, independent, non-mainstream music. Not
finding new music did not automatically lead to an unsatisfying experience for
the participants; however, technology malfunctions in digital MIR systems and
unpleasant environments such as those with unfriendly staff in physical music
spaces (libraries and stores), led to unsatisfying experiences for the participants.
Conclusions – As the
results show that the hedonic aspects of music information seeking are very
important, designers of MIR systems must take into account the hedonic as well
as utilitarian outcomes when creating user interfaces. MIR systems should be
designed with browsing as well as searching capabilities so searchers can make
serendipitous discoveries of new music and information about music. In other
words, MIR systems need to be engaging to ensure satisfying interactions for
searchers.
Commentary
This
study is well positioned in the larger body of research literature on consumer
behaviour, information seeking, and music seeking. The researchers’ study
extends this literature by focusing on the little studied area of music
information seeking in everyday life where a person may have no defined
information need.
This
study is well designed with a clearly explained research problem, theoretical
framework, methodology, and results. The researchers presented well-reasoned
conclusions connecting the study to the existing literature base as well as
discussing how the study extended the understanding of how younger adults
interact with MIR systems. The researchers did not over-generalize their
conclusions and clearly stated the limitations of their research. They also
suggested avenues for future research including studying other populations of
individuals in different geographical locations and with other information
needs in order to more fully understand music information-seeking in multiple
contexts.
This
is a very well written and strong study, appraised using the Critical Appraisal
Checklist created by Glynn (2006) and found to be valid. It is especially
strong in relating the new findings to the theoretical framework and to
relevant literature and there are very few weaknesses. The inclusion of the
interview guide would have been appreciated and would allow for others to
replicate the research. The reporting of the results overall is very organized
and answers the research questions posed at the beginning of the article;
however, there is no differentiation between the participants’ experiences
using digital MIR systems and physical MIR systems. This differentiation would
be useful for designers of MIR systems who may want to use the study’s results
to improve the MIR systems. Furthermore, while the article reported the gender
of the participants, it did not comment on differences or similarities in
experiences or perspectives of information seeking based on gender. Future
research into MIR systems could use gender as a lens of analysis to determine
if and how gender impacts user satisfaction with MIR systems.
This
study extends our understanding of how younger people perceive satisfying music
information-seeking experiences and re-emphasizes the need to take into account
hedonic factors as well as utilitarian factors when designing MIR systems. For
designers of MIR systems, these results demonstrate the necessity of modifying
user interfaces so they facilitate browsing for information and music as the
researchers noted that “searching for music for everyday-life purposes are
often motivated by a vague or ill-defined need” (p. 209). The study should lead
to more research on the music information seeking which will further help in
designing MIR systems and allow librarians to better engage their users in
satisfying information-seeking experiences.
References
Glynn, L.
(2006). A critical appraisal tool for library and information
research. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 387-399. doi:10.1108/07378830610692154