Evidence Summary
Libraries Assist Disaster Survivors with Information Needs and Refuge
but Need to Amplify Their Role and What They Offer
A Review of:
Braquet, D. M. (2010).
Library experiences of Hurricane Katrina and New Orleans flood survivors. LIBRES: Library and Information Science
Research Electronic Journal, 20(1), 1. https://www.libres-ejournal.info/528/
Reviewed by:
Samantha J. Kaplan
Research & Education Librarian, Liaison to the
School of Medicine
Duke University Medical Center Library & Archives
Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
Email: samantha.kaplan@duke.edu
Received: 28 Jan. 2021 Accepted: 8 Apr. 2021
2021 Kaplan.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons‐Attribution‐Noncommercial‐Share Alike License 4.0
International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly attributed, not used for commercial
purposes, and, if transformed, the resulting work is redistributed under the
same or similar license to this one.
DOI: 10.18438/eblip29938
Abstract
Objective – Describe the experiences and library usage of
patrons displaced by Hurricane Katrina and the New Orleans Flood.
Design – A qualitative study with interview components and a
questionnaire with open and closed-end questions
Setting – New Orleans, Louisiana and surrounding area
Subjects – 314
questionnaire respondents and 30 interview (24 face-to-face and 6 phone)
participants with 5 individuals completing both
Methods – The study consisted of an online questionnaire with
open and closed-end questions occurring concurrently with semi-structured
interviews conducted over the phone and in person. Individuals were recruited
via convenience sample by flyers at public locales in the New Orleans area and
electronic mailing lists, forums, blogs, and news sites that catered to the New
Orleans community.
Main Results – Disaster survivors use libraries for Internet
access, information and technology assistance, mental relief, physical refuge,
and also view them as symbols of both loss and hope. Library resources
(including the physical spaces) allowed survivors to regain a sense of control
by helping patrons access local information and experience pre-disaster
pastimes, such as leisure reading.
Conclusion – The study provides rich description of how
libraries can support people displaced by disaster, however just over half of
participants did not consider the library a part of their disaster experience.
Future research should examine how libraries and library workers can amplify
their impact during disasters and disaster recovery, as well as partner with
disaster planning and response professionals.
Commentary
Libraries and library workers have often served
patrons and their communities at critical junctures. This includes, but is in
no way limited to, events such as the Ferguson, MO protests (Peet, 2015),
providing ongoing support during the COVID-19 pandemic (Ali & Gatiti, 2020), and natural disasters, which are the focus
of this article.
This research did include some quantitative data but
the findings were thematic and descriptive in nature, so it was appraised with
the Critical Review Form for Qualitative Studies (Letts et al. 2007). While the
author clearly articulated the need for the study, unreported methodological
components undermine the rigor of the study. There was no mention of a
theoretical or philosophical frame for the study and minimal description of how
interview data was coded. The author also makes no acknowledgment of their
assumptions or biases and how this could have shaped the data.
The known demographic data of the interviewees and
survey respondents, by the author's own acknowledgment, is not representative
of New Orleans. Further, 14 of 30 participants did not complete the demographic
questionnaire sent to interviewees, creating a significant missing data
problem, as from the tables we can determine that primarily white people with
some higher education (community college, 4-year degree, graduate school)
provided this information. This missing data issue was also observed, though to
a lesser degree, in the survey respondent demographic tables. The survey was
only distributed via Internet, likely missing important perspectives and
experiences of those without or with limited Internet access. Combined with all
data being gathered one year after displacement, the author is wise to counsel
against demographic generalizations or conclusions. Library workers should
contemplate the missing perspectives before considering how to apply the
findings to their own setting.
Despite these issues, this is a very valuable study as
it centers the experience of the patron and disaster survivor, making them an
agent and active participant rather than a passive recipient of the library's
beneficence. The study's credibility, which would have been improved with an
interview guide or list of interview questions, is strong as all of the themes
are illustrated with participants' words. The manuscript would have benefitted
greatly from the inclusion of the survey questions as well. Without seeing the
full survey, it is difficult to contextualize the limited findings reported.
The author's findings, while written over a decade
ago, are underscored by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic which has highlighted the
importance of the key themes identified by the author – information and
technology assistance, Internet access, and reading to escape. As Flaherty
(2016) asserted, library involvement in disaster planning "can pay dividends
in the long run in terms of community stability, resiliency and recovery"
(p. 3).
References
Ali, M. Y., & Gatiti, P. (2020). The
COVID‐19 (Coronavirus) pandemic: Reflections on the roles of librarians and
information professionals. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 37(2),
158-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12307
Flaherty, M. G. (2016, August 15). Here, there and everywhere: Disasters
and public libraries. In A sanctuary in
times of need: The public library response [Conference paper] IFLA / WLIC
2016, Columbus, OH, United States. http://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/1375
Letts, L., Wilkins, S., Law, M., Stewart, D., Bosch, J., &
Westmorland, M. (2007). Critical review
form: Qualitative studies (Version 2.0). http://www.peelregion.ca/health/library/eidmtools/qualreview_version2_0.pdf
Peet, L. (2015). Ferguson Library: A community's refuge. Library
Journal, 140(1), 12.