Commentary
Blessing
Babawale Amusan
PhD Student
Department of
Library and Information Science
University of
Ilorin
Ilorin,
Nigeria
Email: 21-68xf002pg@students.unilorin.edu.ng
Adeyinka
Tella
Professor
Department of
Library and Information Science
University of
Ilorin
Ilorin, Nigeria
Email: tella.a@unilorin.edu.ng
Received: 25 May 2025 Accepted: 8 July
2025
2025 Amusan and Tella. This is an Open Access
article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons‐Attribution‐Noncommercial‐Share Alike License 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly attributed, not used for commercial purposes, and, if transformed, the
resulting work is redistributed under the same or similar license to this one.
DOI: 10.18438/eblip30802
Libraries
operate in increasingly complex environments characterized by evolving user
needs, economic constraints, and digital transformation. To stay relevant,
libraries must embrace data-driven strategies that demonstrate value, enhance
service delivery, and support evidence based
decision-making. Data are now a strategic asset for library development,
informing areas such as service planning, resource allocation, performance
assessment, and collection management. Traditionally, library data comprise
circulation statistics, reference queries, acquisition records, and user
demographics. While useful for operational reporting, these data types provide
limited information regarding users’ behaviours. As a corollary to this,
libraries now generate and analyze more diverse data sources, such as digital
footprints, search patterns, system logs, and engagement metrics from
integrated library systems and online platforms (Moses et al., 2023; Scarnò,
2010). These provide better understanding of user preferences, thereby enabling
more targeted, efficient, and responsive services.
Data,
in this context, refer to any qualitative or quantitative facts gathered
through library interactions and systems. Library development denotes the
strategic improvement of infrastructure, services, and policies. Evidence based
practice is the use of systematically gathered data to inform decisions,
enhance performance, and justify resource allocation (Thorpe, 2018). This
article, therefore, addresses the question: Why
are data so important to library development today? It aims to: (i)
identify types and strategic functions of library data; (ii) examine their role
in driving service improvement; (iii) explore barriers to effective data use;
and (iv) outline practical implications for library policy, professional
practice, and institutional strategy.
Libraries
generate and manage diverse data types that serve operational, evaluative, and
developmental functions. These data are instrumental in aligning services with
broader library goals such as enhancing user engagement, improving service
quality, managing space effectively, as well as maintaining institutional
relevance. Technological advancements have greatly expanded the nature and
scope of library data, moving beyond traditional metrics like circulation
statistics and user demographics to include digital footprints, user
behavioural analytics, and system-generated logs (Adeyemi et al., 2025). These
developments enable libraries to design more targeted services, optimize
resource use, and support evidence based
decision-making. Common types of library data and their strategic functions
include the following.
This
includes demographic information, borrowing histories, user profiles, feedback
forms, research interests, and inquiry records. These data provide foundational
knowledge for personalizing services, segmenting users for outreach, and
designing needs-based programs for users. When analyzed over time, such data
can also detect shifts in user preferences and draw attention to marginalized
user groups, thereby enabling inclusive service planning.
These
are data on how users interact with both physical and digital collections, such
as circulation statistics, download counts, session durations, and page view
counts from databases. Usage data are increasingly becoming more detailed and
specific, which allow libraries to assess not only which resources are used but
how, when, and by whom. Coupled with Altmetrics and citation tracking, these types of data are instrumental for justifying
subscriptions, refining discovery tools (like OPAC, search bars on library
website), and supporting digital contents management.
Structured
metadata (such as title, author, subject headings, and identifiers) are not
only used for cataloguing but also support resource discoverability in external
platforms through standards like schema.org, BIBFRAME, and Dublin Core. In a
linked-data environment, these metadata also improve library visibility across
open web and AI-driven discovery platforms.
As
libraries transition into hybrid learning environments, spatial data are
becoming more important. Head counts, seat occupancy, and sensor-generated heat
maps inform space redesigns and scheduling. Environmental monitoring (such as
temperature, noise levels, and air quality) also affects how physical spaces
are adapted for diverse users. Libraries, such as at North Carolina State
University, have pioneered the use of Internet of Things devices to integrate
real-time spatial data into user-facing services (Casden et al., 2020).
Data
about users’ information needs, budgets allocation, vendor information, and
procurement history underpin internal efficiency. These help libraries conduct
cost-benefit analyses, monitor vendor performance, and even assess staff
allocation and competencies. Such data help ensure acquisitions are both
cost-effective and responsive to user demands. This category of data also
supports supply chain transparency and procurement audits.
Academic
libraries manage repositories that house theses, dissertations, research
datasets, and other publications. Metrics on downloads, citations, and
geographic reach help libraries demonstrate institutional research impact,
support compliance with open access mandates, and inform collection development
in emerging disciplines.
Details
about staff roles, qualifications, skill sets, and professional development
activities are increasingly managed through integrated systems. These datasets
support human resource planning, staff training needs analysis, and performance
review. Workforce analytics are significant, especially in aligning staffing
patterns with user demands and evolving service models.
Big
data in libraries typically emerge from digital information environment, such
as online or database search histories, real-time logs, and system usage
trails. These datasets are high in volume, velocity, and variety, and require
advanced analytical tools and AI techniques for processing. They are suited to
predictive modeling (e.g., demand forecasting, user segmentation) and service
personalization efforts, such as enabling libraries to anticipate needs and
tailor services accordingly (Kamupunga & Chunting, 2019; Shuaib et al.,
2023).
In
contrast, small data refer to context-specific, easily interpretable data like
user surveys, individual borrowing patterns, or database access logs. These
provide detailed information about specific user behaviours or information
needs, and thus important for addressing localized problems and making tactical
adjustments. While big data enable macro-level strategy, small data foster
micro-level responsiveness, and together, they create a robust evidence base
for planning.
Critically,
the usefulness of library data lies not in their accumulation, but in their
transformation into actionable intelligence. Data must be processed into
meaningful information to guide planning and improve services. Libraries that
harness both big and small data can develop responsive strategies that meet
user needs and support long-term goals (Kamupunga & Chunting, 2019). This
requires a culture of inquiry, analytical skill sets, and the integration of
insights into decision-making. Therefore, the next section elaborates on how
these data types enable libraries to justify funding, optimize services, and
remain adaptable in a rapidly evolving knowledge environment.
Data-driven
decision-making is increasingly recognized as essential for enhancing the relevance,
efficiency, and sustainability of library services. It ensures services are
evidence based, adaptable, and aligned with user expectations. Libraries that
utilize data are better positioned to deliver measurable value, improve service
quality, and remain responsive to evolving user needs. Major reasons to justify
the importance of data in library development include the following.
One
of the primary uses of data in libraries is to guide strategic decision-making
through evidence based approaches. Data help
libraries identify and anticipate users’ needs, allocate resources effectively,
and design relevant services. Predictive and prescriptive analytics, derived
from usage patterns and user feedback, support demand forecasting,
priority-setting, and policy formulation. Bryant (2024) emphasized the
significant role of data in guiding planning, evaluation and service
enhancement. Data-informed strategies enable libraries to respond more
effectively to current demands while also preparing to meet future challenges
(Okonoko et al., 2018; Pierce, 2021; Press Reader Team, 2023).
Understanding
how users interact with resources enables libraries to tailor services to
specific needs. Tracking borrowing patterns, digital access, and visit
frequencies enables libraries to identify user needs and tailor services
accordingly. This ensures a balanced and responsive collection aligned with
current demand (Mannion, 2019; Vaughan, 2020).
Libraries
often operate under financial and staffing constraints. Given such constraints,
data help libraries allocate budgets, space, and staffing where they are most
effective. Metrics on users’ demands and collections usage guide acquisitions
and technology investments, thereby maximizing limited resources (Gupta, 2025;
Shuaib et al., 2023).
By
identifying high-use materials and underutilized resources, libraries can build
collections that reflect actual needs. Data support informed de-selection and
identify collection gaps, aligning collections with user needs. This balance
between users’ demands and resource provision enhances user confidence and
satisfaction (Bamigbola, 2023).
With
growing competition for institutional funding, data are essential for
showcasing the library’s impact. Usage reports, impact evaluations, and
satisfaction metrics demonstrate library relevance. These
help justify funding, validate contributions to institutional goals, and
communicate value to stakeholders (Frederick et al., 2020; LibLime, 2023).
Libraries
committed to continuous improvement depend on data to evaluate performance and
implement necessary changes. Continuous evaluation using benchmarks and
performance indicators allows libraries to refine services. Data-informed
improvement processes ensure services remain relevant and of high quality (Sani
& Oseji, 2022).
User
expectations are rapidly evolving. Data on preferences and service use patterns
help libraries remain agile, adapting to new trends and information behaviours
(Agbonifoh & Osifo, 2017; Boiser, 2024). Services aligned with user needs
are more likely to succeed.
Monitoring
how users engage with digital tools informs decisions on which platforms to
adopt or improve. This ensures investments are aligned with user needs and
yield positive returns in terms of access and satisfaction.
In
academic libraries, data facilitate the evaluation of research services,
teaching support, and scholarly communications. Libraries contribute to
institutional performance by leveraging data to enhance academic outputs and
collaboration.
Despite the
transformative potential of data, many libraries face certain challenges in
leveraging it effectively for service development and planning. Such challenges
include the following.
Many
professionals in the field still lack the necessary competencies to analyze and
apply data in practical contexts. This limits the adoption of evidence based practices and reduces the effectiveness
of data collected for decision-making within the library.
Collecting
user data for service enhancement must be carefully balanced with maintaining
confidentiality and protecting user rights. Meanwhile, with the absence of
robust data governance frameworks, ethical ambiguities may discourage
meaningful data use.
Effective
data utilization relies on reliable systems and platforms, yet many libraries,
especially in low-resource settings, lack access to modern technologies, stable
internet connectivity, or the funding required for upgrades (Rawayau, 2023).
Shifting
to data-driven approaches can cause resistance from staff accustomed to
traditional methods. Fear of redundancy, low confidence with technology, as
well as institutional apathy may all contribute to slow adoption.
Without
well-defined institutional policies covering data ownership, access, privacy, and
retention, libraries may be uncertain about legal responsibilities, user
rights, or ethical boundaries, thereby operating in legal and procedural grey
areas, which can further limit data-driven initiatives within such libraries.
Rather
than simply calling for more resources, libraries can adopt realistic,
context-sensitive strategies to gradually strengthen their data capabilities.
The following implications focus on actions that can be pursued even amid
systemic constraints.
While
formal training such as integrating data literacy into the core curriculum of
library and information science is important, libraries can encourage peer
mentoring whereby employees can share knowledge relating to data management.
Internal expertise, even if limited, can be strategically leveraged to support
incremental improvements.
Instead
of waiting for major infrastructure investments, libraries can adopt open
source or low-cost data tools, such as Google Forms for surveys, Excel for
basic analytics, or KOHA for integrated library systems. These enable libraries
to begin using data meaningfully without large upfront costs.
Even
in the absence of formal national regulations, libraries can develop simple
internal protocols for data handling, such as anonymizing user data, obtaining
informed consent, as well as setting clear data access levels. Such guidelines
support ethical practices without requiring complex infrastructure.
Embedding
data into library work does not require all staff to become analysts. Rather,
library managers can model curiosity and evidence based
questioning in everyday operations, e.g., “What do the data
suggest
about how users interact with this service?” This will enable them to shift
culture gradually.
Rather
than overhauling entire services, libraries can initiate small, data-informed
changes, such as adjusting opening hours based on usage data, or creating
targeted guides for frequently searched topics, and assess their effectiveness
before scaling up.
Libraries
can collaborate with university information and communication technology units,
data science departments, or external data experts to support data-related
projects. For example, final-year information technology students may assist
the library with data visualization tools as part of their project works.
Instead
of just reporting numbers, libraries can combine data with stories of impacts
to strengthen advocacy. For instance, showing how increased database usage
supported postgraduate research completion can be more persuasive to funders
than raw statistics alone.
Libraries
can begin integrating basic data points, such as most-requested resources or
attendance at training sessions, into monthly reports or annual reviews. This
fosters familiarity with data use and supports more strategic decision-making
over time.
To
demonstrate the transformative potential of data in library development, it is
useful to examine specific examples where libraries have applied data
strategically. These cases illustrate a range of data methods, like
descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, and prescriptive analytics, and equally
show how data use can directly inform service improvements, planning, and
advocacy.
The
Library Impact Data Project at Huddersfield used descriptive and diagnostic
analytics to examine activity data such as book loans, e-resource usage, and
gate entries across over 33,000 students in eight UK universities (Stone &
Ramsden, 2013). By correlating these indicators with academic performance, the
researchers uncovered a statistically significant relationship between high
library usage and better degree outcomes. These findings were not only
published but actively used to strengthen funding applications and inform
library outreach strategies. This case demonstrates the advocacy power of data
when tied to academic success.
At
North Carolina State, a combination of Internet of Things occupancy sensors and
the open-source Suma toolkit provided real-time, location-based usage data of
library spaces. These descriptive and prescriptive data allowed staff to
optimize space use, redesign study areas based on crowding patterns, as well as
introducing “How busy is the library?” dashboards to help students avoid
congestion (Casden et al., 2020). The initiative resulted in better user
experience and more efficient space allocation. This indicates how real-time
data can drive responsive service delivery.
Using
descriptive analytics of library usage data from 2018–2020, the Nyong Essien
Library identified poor engagement with both print and electronic resources
(Aloysius et al., 2022). This analysis served as a baseline for evaluating
service relevance and pinpointing areas requiring outreach and promotional
interventions. Although the findings highlighted challenges, they provided
actionable insights that could inform redesign of user education or access
strategies.
Across
several academic libraries, predictive analytics have been used to refine
demand-driven acquisition models (Jiang et al., 2019). Libraries employed
survival and time-to-trigger models to predict which e-books were likely to be
accessed and when, allowing them to prioritize purchases. The model indicates a
shift from reactive to proactive resource acquisition, where data anticipate
rather than merely record need.
The
role of data in modern library development can no longer be regarded as
supplementary. It is now foundational to effective service delivery, strategic
planning, decision-making, and institutional relevance. As this paper has
shown, data have become indispensable to the development of libraries, enabling
them to make informed decisions, understand user needs, allocate resources
efficiently, and demonstrate value to stakeholders. These functions are
particularly critical in resource-constrained environments, where libraries
must continually justify their contributions and compete for limited funding.
However,
the effective utilization of data is not without its challenges. Issues such as
inadequate data literacy among staff, infrastructural and technological
limitations, inconsistent institutional support, and ethical concerns must be
addressed for data-driven practices to thrive. Strengthening staff capacity
through ongoing training, integrating data literacy into library and
information science curricula, and fostering a supportive institutional culture
are critical steps. The integration of data-driven practices is not merely a
technical upgrade; it signals a cultural shift towards accountability,
responsiveness, evidence informed planning, and continuous improvement in
library service delivery. Libraries that adopt and sustain this approach will
be better positioned to remain relevant, resilient, and impactful in a rapidly
evolving information environment.
Blessing
Babawale Amusan: Conceptualization, Writing - original
draft, review & editing Adeyinka
Tella: Writing - review & editing
Adeyemi, I. O., Muhammed-Jamiu,
R., Muhammed, I. O., Mustapha, R. T., Mustapha, M.
O., Musa, Z., & Salman, A. (2025). Big data applications and
management for digital library services in selected academic libraries in Kwara
state, Nigeria. Digital Library
Perspectives,
41(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-06-2024-0090
Agbonifoh, C.,
& Osifo, S. J. (2017). Factors responsible for poor service delivery in
Nigerian public organizations. Nigeria
Journal of Business Administration, 15(1), 7–21.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350102617_FACTORS_RESPONSIBLE_FOR_POOR_SERVICE_DELIVERY_IN_NIGERIAN_PUBLIC_ORGANIZATIONS
Aloysius, D. A., Eyene, E. T., &
Williams, C. A. (2022). Library usage statistics (2018–2020): A prerequisite for evaluating information service
delivery in Nyong Essien Library, University of Uyo, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, 7258. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/7258
Bamigbola, A. A.
(2023). “Big data” revitalizing librarianship: Impact on librarians. Library Philosophy and Practice, 7988. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/7988
Bryant, R.
(2024, February 21). Libraries support data-driven decision making. Hanging
Together. https://hangingtogether.org/libraries-support-data-driven-decision-making/
Frederick, J.,
Schonfeld, R. C., & Wolff-Eisenberg, C. (2020, December 9). The impacts of
COVID-19 on academic library budgets: Fall 2020. The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/12/09/academic-library-budgets-fall-2020/
Gupta, O. (2025,
July 7). What is resource allocation? A guide to project success. Saviom.
https://www.saviom.com/blog/what-is-resource-allocation-and-why-is-it-important/
Kamupunga, W.,
& Chunting, Y. (2019). Application of big data in libraries. International Journal of Computer
Applications, 178(16), 34–38. https://www.ijcaonline.org/archives/volume178/number16/kamupunga-2019-ijca-918955.pdf
LibLime. (2023,
December 11). The impact of library budgets on access to information in the
digital era. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/impact-library-budgets-access-information-digital-era-liblime-y6wtc
Mannion, C. M. (2019). Data speaks volumes:
Evidence-based delivery of library services in a user-centred library. Journal of the Australian Library and
Information Association, 68(2), 180–193.https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2019.1610141
Moses, T.
K., Dauda, J., & Blamah, N.
V. (2023). Smart e-library management system based on user behaviour in
Ibrahim Babangida Library, Modibbo Adama University Yola, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, 7628. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/7628
Pierce, D.
(2021, June 21). 21st century libraries: Changing from the ground up. Library
Journal. https://www.libraryjournal.com/story/2-st-century-lbraries-changing-from-the-ground-up-lj210616
Press Reader Team. (2023, September 5).
Faced with budget cuts, academic libraries must get creative with resources. Pressreader.
https://blog.pressreader.com/libraries-institutions/faced-with-budget-cuts-academic-libraries-must-get-creative-with-resources
Sani, J. O., & Oseji, N. A. (2022). Utilizing the
potentials of big data in library environments in Nigerian for recommender
services. Library Philosophy and Practice, 7467. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/7467
Scarnò, M.
(2010). User’s behaviour inside a digital library. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST),
2(2), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdsst.2010040106
Shuaib, A. O.,
Ajani, Y. A., & Kosoko-Oyedeko, G. A. (2023, September 25–28). Relevance
of big data and the management of libraries in the era of the fourth industrial
revolution (4IR) [Paper presentation]. Library and Information Science
Conference, Ibadan, Nigeria.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379054109_RELEVANCE_OF_BIG_DATA_AND_THE_MANAGEMENT_OF_LIBRARIES_IN_THE_ERA_OF_THE_FOURTH_INDUSTRIAL_REVOLUTION_4IR
Thorpe, C. (2018). Evidence-based
practice: Evaluating our collections and services. The ANZTLA eJournal,21(1), 87–96.
https://doi.org/10.31046/anztla.v0i21.953
Vaughan, J.
(2020). Why data is collected and how it is used. Library Technology Reports, 56(6), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.5860/ltr.56n6