Exploring Empathy and the Right Hemisphere: From Neurological Foundations to Clinical Insights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/eureka28810Keywords:
Right Hemisphere, Neuropsychology, Empathic Functioning, Emotional ProcessingAbstract
Empathy, a multifaceted construct encompassing affective responsiveness, cognitive perspective-taking, and emotional regulation, is fundamental to human relationships and societal cohesion. This review examines the right hemisphere's role in mediating empathic processes, drawing upon evidence from neuroimaging, lesion studies, and investigations of gender differences. Findings demonstrate that the right hemisphere is critical for processing emotional cues, such as facial expressions and tone of voice, which are essential for recognizing and responding to others' emotions. Damage to this region significantly impairs emotional recognition and empathetic behaviour, with implications for interpersonal interactions and broader societal dynamics. Furthermore, empathy is not static but evolves throughout life, influenced by biological, cognitive, emotional, and environmental factors. By synthesizing current research, this review highlights the right hemisphere's pivotal role in the neural underpinnings of empathy, providing insights into its developmental trajectory and potential therapeutic targets for enhancing emotional and social functioning.
Downloads
References
Adolphs, R. (2002). Neural systems for recognizing emotion. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12(2), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(02)00301-X
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2000). The 'Reading the Mind in the Eyes' test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00715
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The Empathy Quotient: An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
Barton, J. J. S. (2008). Prosopagnosia and acquired disorders of face recognition. Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.004
Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel — now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2555
Davidson, R. J., & Irwin, W. (1999). The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(1), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01265-0
Davidson, R. J. (2004). What does the prefrontal cortex “do” in affect: Perspectives on frontal EEG asymmetry research. Biological Psychology, 67(1-2), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.008
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2006). A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(2), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00406.x
Gainotti, G. (2019). Emotional blunting and empathy disorders following right hemisphere lesions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00672
Gaspar, A., & Esteves, F. (2022). Empathy development from adolescence to adulthood and its consistency across targets. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936053
Goleman, D. (2006). Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships. Random House Publishing Group.
Keenan, J. P., Nelson, A., O'Connor, M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2001). Self-recognition and the right hemisphere. Nature, 409(6818), 305. https://doi.org/10.1038/35053167
Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. L. (2014). The case for mental imagery. Oxford University Press.
Lamm, C., Decety, J., & Singer, T. (2011). Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. NeuroImage, 54(3), 2492-2502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014
Lane, R. D., Kivley, L. S., Andrew Du Bois, M., Shamasundara, P., & Schwartz, G. E. (1995). Levels of emotional awareness and the degree of right hemispheric dominance in the perception of facial emotion. Neuropsychologia, 33(5), 525-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(94)00131-8
Lane, R. D., Reiman, E. M., Ahern, G. L., Schwartz, G. E., & Davidson, R. J. (1998). Neuroanatomical correlates of happiness, sadness, and disgust. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(7), 926-933. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.7.926
Lane, R. D., Reiman, E. M., Axelrod, B., Yun, L. S., Holmes, A., & Schwartz, G. (1998). Neural correlates of levels of emotional awareness: Evidence of an interaction between emotion and attention in the anterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(4), 525-535. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892998562924
Miller, B. L., Boeve, B. F., & Dickerson, B. C. (2016). The behavioral neurology of dementia. Cambridge University Press.
Mishkin, M., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1982). Contribution of striate inputs to the visuospatial functions of parieto-preoccipital cortex in monkeys. Behavioural Brain Research, 6(1), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(82)90081-X
Phan, K. L., Wager, T. D., Taylor, S. F., & Liberzon, I. (2002). Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: A meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. NeuroImage, 16(2), 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1087
Porges, S. W. (2001). The polyvagal theory: Phylogenetic substrates of a social nervous system. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 42(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(01)00162-3
Rankin, K. P., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Allison, S. C., Stanley, C. M., Glenn, S., & Weiner, M. W. (2006). Structural anatomy of empathy in neurodegenerative disease. Brain, 129(11), 2945-2956. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl254
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010). The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(4), 264-274. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2805
Rueckert, L., & Naybar, N. (2008). Gender differences in empathy: The role of the right hemisphere. Brain and Cognition, 67(2), 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.002
Saxe, R., & Wexler, A. (2005). Making sense of another mind: The role of the right temporo-parietal junction. Neuropsychologia, 43(10), 1391-1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.02.013
Schultz, R. T., Grelotti, D. J., Klin, A., Kleinman, J., Van der Gaag, C., Marois, R., & Skudlarski, P. (2003). The role of the fusiform face area in social cognition: Implications for the pathobiology of autism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 358(1430), 415-427. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1208
Schultz, W. (2016). Neuronal reward and decision signals: From theories to data. Physiological Reviews, 95(3), 853-951. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00023.2014
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Perry, D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132(3), 617-627. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn279
Shenton, M. E., Dickey, C. C., Frumin, M., & McCarley, R. W. (2001). A review of MRI findings in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 49(1-2), 1-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-9964(01)00163-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Eureka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By signing the Eureka publication agreement, authors agree to the following:
- The work has not been previously published in any format;
- Eureka is granted the royalty-free right to publish and disseminate the work in current and future formats;
- The work will be published in Eureka under a Creative Commons license. Eureka encourages authors to publish the work under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to distribute, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as they credit the Author(s) for the original creation.
Authors may however choose to have their work distributed under any of the Creative Commons licenses currently available by specifying their preferred license in the publication agreement. A description of the Creative Commons licenses is available here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/
- Authors retain their copyright, including the right to subsequently publish or disseminate their work elsewhere, provided that they make reasonable efforts to ensure that the publication in Eureka is acknowledged.
- Authors agree to determine, prior to publication, whether it is necessary to obtain permissions from any third party who hold rights with respect to any photographs, illustrations, drawings, text, or any other material (“third party work”) to be published in connection with your work. Copyright permission will not be necessary if the use is determined to be fair dealing, if the work is in the public domain, or if the rights-holder has granted a Creative Commons or similar license.
- All co-authors and investigators (e.g. faculty supervisors) with claims to the intellectual property have read and signed the agreement, thereby providing their consent for the submission to be published in Eureka.
Unless otherwise specified, authors guarantee that all parts of the submission are the author’s original work. Submissions containing evidence of plagiarism will not be eligible for publication.
