Rigor, Transparency, Evidence, and Representation in Discourse Analysis: Challenges and Recommendations

Authors

  • Thomas Greckhamer Louisiana State University
  • Sebnem Cilesiz University of Louisiana at Lafayette

Abstract

Discourse analysis is a promising qualitative research approach across social science disciplines for analyzing the construction of reality in a variety of organizational and institutional arenas. However, conducting empirical discourse analyses remains challenging. In this paper we identify four key challenges involved in doing discourse analysis and then recommend several “tools” derived from empirical practice to address these challenges. We demonstrate these recommendations by drawing on examples from a discourse analysis study we conducted, of strategic management discourse in public education. Our tools and recommendations aim to facilitate conducting and writing up discourse analyses and may also contribute to addressing the identified challenges in other qualitative methodologies.

Author Biographies

Thomas Greckhamer, Louisiana State University

Thomas Greckhamer is the William and Catherine Rucks Associate Professor of Management at Louisiana State University. His current research focuses on the role of discourse in strategy and organizations and on qualitative and configurational approaches to strategy and organizational studies. He holds a Ph.D. in management from the University of Florida.

Sebnem Cilesiz, University of Louisiana at Lafayette

Sebnem Cilesiz is Assistant Professor of Qualitative Research and Curriculum Theory at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. Her research focuses on social and cultural contexts of technology use, qualitative research methodology, and urban education. She holds a Ph.D. in education from the University of Florida.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-17

Issue

Section

Articles