The Argumentative Quality of the Qualitative Research Report

Authors

  • Adri Smaling

Abstract

The author argues that, to be convincing, the claims of a qualitative research report must be logically and clearly supported. Eight rules for good argumentative dialogue are presented. The author then presents the process of analogical reasoning to support cross-case generalization.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2008-12-19

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2002)

Section

Articles

License

The Creative Commons‐Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License 4.0 International applies to all works published by the International Journal of Qualitative Methods. Copyright for articles published in the International Journal of Qualitative Methods remains with the first author. Creative Commons License
It is the responsibility of the author, not the IJQM, to obtain permission to use any previously published and/or copyrighted material.