'Is that what I said?' Interview Transcript Approval by Participants: An Aspect of Ethics in Qualitative Research

  • Irit Mero-Jaffe Beit Berl Academic College


This article deals with insights gained from data analysis of feedback comments on transcripts sent to interviewees. It contributes to understanding of research studies that include transcripts, specifically on the contribution of participants’ review of transcripts on the quality of those transcripts, and thus on the quality of research. The transfer of the transcripts to the interviewees was intended to validate the transcripts, to preserve research ethics, and to empower the interviewees by allowing them control of what was written. Interviewee responses related to the ratification of content, the authenticity of that which was said during the interview, corrections of language, additional clarifications, power interactions and changes in the balance of power between the interviewer and interviewees, feelings of embarrassment and threat, research ethics, and reflective responses. The experience of sending the transcripts to the interviewees raised research and ethical issues that require added caution and consideration when sending transcripts to interviewees.

Author Biography

Irit Mero-Jaffe, Beit Berl Academic College
Irit Mero-Jaffe is a lecturer in Research Methods, Evaluation and Assessment. She has extensive experience in qualitative research and project evaluation.