Local Citation Analysis of Graduate Biology Theses: Collection Development Implications.

Authors

  • Laura Newton Miller

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1498

Abstract

This paper will focus on the citation analysis of graduate masters theses from Carleton University's Biology Department with implications for library collection management decisions. Twenty-five masters theses were studied to determine citation types and percentages, ranking of journals by frequency of citation and by number of authors citing, and by age range of journal citations. The researcher examined what percentages of journals were accessible through the local catalogue and conducted further analysis of specifics regarding unavailability. Journals were also ranked by subject specialty. Results indicate that although the library has many of the journal articles cited, knowing why a citation was unavailable is useful for establishing future purchasing needs. Although journal rankings are traditionally performed using total number of citations, the ranking by number of authors citing a source can make a difference when compiling core journal lists. The researcher concludes by discussing implications for collection development in times of fiscal constraint. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beck, S.P. 2008. Practical Research Methods for Librarians and Information Professionals. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.

Black, S. 2001. Using citation analysis to pursue a core collection of journals for communication disorders. Library Resources & Technical Services 45(1): 3-9.

Bradford, S.C. 1953. Documentation (2nd ed.). London: C. Lockwood.

Brazzeal, B. & Fowler, R. 2005. Patterns of information use in graduate research in forestry. Science & Technology Libraries 26(2): 91-106.

Brown, C. 2005. Where do molecular biology graduate students find information? Science & Technology Libraries 25(3): 89-104.

Budd, J. 1988. A bibliometric analysis of higher education literature. Research in Higher Education 28(2): 180-190.

Carleton Biology Department. Research areas. [Internet]. [Retrieved 2010 Jul 6]. Available from: http://www2.carleton.ca/biology/research/research-areas/

Carleton University Library. [Internet]. [Updated 2008 March]. Carleton University library and archives strategic plan 2008-2010. Available from: http://www.library.carleton.ca.proxy.library.carleton.ca/about/StratPlanLongFINALFeb2808.pdf

Crotteau, M. 1997. Support for biological research by an academic library: A journal citation study. Science & Technology Libraries 17(1): 67-86.

Delendick, T.J. 1990. Citation analysis of the literature of systematic botany: A preliminary survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41(7): 535-543.

deVries, S., Kelly, R. & Storm, P. M. Accepted 2009 Oct 23. Moving beyond citation analysis: How surveys and interviews enhance, enrich, and expand your research findings. College & Research Libraries Preprint [Internet]. [Cited 2010 Jul 10]; 1-15. Available from http://crl.acrl.org/content/early/2010/04/29/crl-45r1.full.pdf+html

Feyereisen, P. & Spoiden, A. 2009. Can local citation analysis of master's and doctoral theses help decision-making about the management of the collection of periodicals? A case study in psychology and education sciences. Journal of Academic Librarianship 35(6): 514-522.

Gross, P.L.K. & Gross, E.M. 1927. College libraries and chemical education. Science 66(1713): 385-389.

Haglund, L. & Olsson, P. 2008. The impact on university libraries of changes in information behavior among academic researchers: A multiple case study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 34(1): 52-59.

Joswick, K. & Stierman, J. 1997. The core list mirage: A comparison of the journals frequently consulted by faculty and students. College & Research Libraries 58(1): 48-55.

Kraus, J.R. 2004. Citation patterns of advanced undergraduate students in biology, 2000-2002. Science & Technology Libraries 22(3/4):161-179.

Kraus, J.R. 2005. Comparing journal use between biology faculty and undergraduate students. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship [Internet]. [Cited 2010 Jul 10]; 43 Summer 2005. Available from: http://www.istl.org/05-summer/article2.html

Kuruppu, P.U. & Moore, D.C. 2008. Information use by PhD students in agriculture and biology: A dissertation citation analysis. portal 8(4): 387-405.

LaBonte, K.B. 2005. Citation analysis: A method for collection development for a rapidly developing field. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship [Internet]. [Cited 2010 Jul 10]; 43 Summer 2005. Available from: http://www.istl.org/05-summer/refereed.html

Lascar, C. & Mendelsohn, L.D. 2001. An analysis of journal use by structural biologists with applications for journal collection development decisions. College & Research Libraries 62(5): 422-433.

Leiding, R. 2005. Using citation checking of undergraduate honors thesis bibliographies to evaluate library collections. College & Research Libraries 66(5): 417-429.

McCain, K.W. & Bobick, J.E. 1981. Patterns of journal use in a departmental library: A citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 32(4): 257-267.

Microsoft Corporation. 2003. Microsoft Excel. Mississauga: Microsoft Corporation.

Nabe, J. & Imre, A. 2008. Dissertation citations in organismal biology at Southern Illinois University at Carbondale: Implications for collection development. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship [Internet]. [Cited 2010 Jul 10]. 55 Fall 2008. Available from: http://www.istl.org/08-fall/refereed.html

Newton Miller, L. 2009. Information literacy assessment of biology graduate students. Unpublished manuscript.

OCLC Online Computer Library Center. 2010. WorldCat. Ohio: OCLC.

Office of Institutional Research and Planning, Carleton University. Carleton university data cubes. [Internet]. [Cited 2010 Jul 8]. Available from: {http://oirp.carleton.ca/main/datacubes/}

Osareh, F. 1996. Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: A review of literature. Libri 46(4): 217-225.

Pancheshnikov, Y. 2007. A comparison of literature citations in faculty publications and student theses as indicators of collection use and a background for collection management at a university library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 33(6): 674-683.

Prabha, C. 1996. Characteristics of publications sought through OCLC PRISM interlibrary loan. Annual Review of OCLC Research. [Internet]. Available from {http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/1990-1999.htm}

Proquest Serials Editorial Department. 2009. Ulrich's Periodical Directory 2009 (47th ed.). New Jersey: Proquest.

Proquest UMI Dissertation Publishing. 2010. Dissertations and theses @ Carleton. Michigan: Proquest UMI Dissertation Publishing.

Rolinson, J., Al-Shanbari, H., & Meadows, A.J. 1996. Information usage by biological researchers. Journal of Information Science 22(1): 47-53.

SPSS Inc. 2009. IBM SPSS statistics 18. Chicago: SPSS.

Stankus, T. 2010. Scientists who work with insects: How do arts and sciences and agriculture school faculty differ in where they publish? Science & Technology Libraries 29(1/2): 16-33.

Swanepoel, A. 2008. Using citation analysis to determine the use of information sources in the humanities by postgraduate students in the health and biomedical sciences: A case study. IFLA Conference Proceedings. [Internet]. [Cited December 17, 2010]. Available from: http://archive.ifla.org/IV/ifla74/papers/124-Swanepoel-en.pdf

Sylvia, M.J. 1998. Citation analysis as an unobtrusive method for journal collection evaluation using psychology student research bibliographies. Collection Building 17(1): 20-28.

Thomson Reuters. 2010a. Journal citation reports. New York: Thomson Reuters.

Thomson Reuters. 2010b. Web of science. New York: Thomson Reuters.

Walcott, R. 1994. Local citation studies - a shortcut to local knowledge. Science & Technology Libraries 14(3): 1-14.

Williams, V.K. & Fletcher, C.L. 2006. Materials used by master's students in engineering and implications for collection development: A citation analysis. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship [Internet]. [Cited 2010 Jul 10]. 45 Winter 2006. Available from: http://www.istl.org/06-winter/refereed1.html

Downloads

Published

2011-03-01

How to Cite

Miller, L. N. (2011). Local Citation Analysis of Graduate Biology Theses: Collection Development Implications. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (64). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1498

Issue

Section

Refereed Articles
Share |