Assessing Information-Seeking Behavior of Computer Science and Engineering Faculty.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1501Abstract
This study, the first phase of a multi-phase effort, was undertaken to assess and provide for the information needs of the Faculty of the Schools of Science and Engineering at The College of New Jersey (TCNJ) in the digital age. The objectives of this phase were to: 1) gain an in-depth understanding of how computer science and engineering faculty members currently obtain information and thus influence students, 2) determine changes needed in the collection/services of the library to facilitate this information flow and implement desired change and 3) share this experience so other librarians may question whether their faculty members also feel misunderstood and 4) initiate a dialogue with faculty members to obtain their perspective and insight. Focus Group standardized protocol with a trained facilitator and recorder was employed to gather qualitative data from 47% of the computer science and engineering faculty. The facilitator employed a pre-designed guide to elicit responses about current and desired library collections and services. Nine major information behaviors or issues were identified as needing to be addressed. From this feedback, collection/services changes were implemented to support the positive information behaviors and to overcome barriers to enhancing students' information literacy and life-long learning skills while assuring faculty members that their needs were heard and understood. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Downloads
References
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). 2003. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs (Effective for Evaluation during the 2003-2004 Accreditation Cycle). Baltimore, MD: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Allen, T.J. 1977. Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Association of College and Research Libraries. 2000. Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education.Chicago: ACRL, ALA.
Association of College and Research Libraries/STS Task Force on Information Literacy for Science and Technology, American Library Association. 2006. Information Literacy Standards for Science and Engineering/Technology. Chicago: ACRL, ALA.
Baer, W. and Li, L. 2009. AC 2009-387: Library and Information Use Patterns by Engineering Faculty and Students. American Society for Engineering Education Conference Proceedings.
Christensen, Clayton, M. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
DeRosa, C. 2005. Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources: Report to the OCLC Membership. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center.
Ercegovac, Z. 2009. What Engineering Sophomores Know and would like to Know about Engineering Information Sources and Access. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. [Internet]. [Cited February 7, 2009]. Available from http://www.istl.org/09-spring/refereed3.html
Finn, B. and Johnston, P. 2004. Index Use by Engineering Faculty and Students. Georgia Library Quarterly 41(3): 5-15.
Garoufallou, E., Balatsoukas, P., Siatri, R., Zafeiriou, G., Asderi, S. and Ekizoglou, P. 2008. Greek Academic Librarians' Perceptions of the Impact of Google on their Role as Information Providers. Education for Information 26:133-145.
Greenbaum, T.L. 1988. The Practical Handbook and Guide to Focus Group Research. Lexington, MA: C.C. Heath.
Greenbaum, T.L. 1993. The Handbook of Focus Group Research. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
Haglund, L. and Olsson, P. 2008. The Impact on University Libraries of Changes in Information Behavior among Academic Researchers: A Multiple Case Study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 34(1): 52-29.
Hemminger, B.M., Lu, D., Vaughan, K.T., and Adams, S.J. 2007. Information Seeking Behavior of Academic Scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(14):2205-2225.
Housewright, R. and Schonfeld, R. 2008. Ithaka's 2006 Studies of Key Stakeholders in the Digital Transformation in Higher Education. New York, NY: Ithaka. [Internet]. [Cited September 2009]. Available from {http://www.ithaka.org/publications/facultyandlibrariansurveys}
Krueger, Richard A. and Casey, Mary Anne. 2000 Focus Groups -- 3rd. ed. A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Massie, R.J. 2008. Miles Conrad Lecture 2008, February 25, 2008. Philadelphia, Pa. NFAIS. [Internet]. [Cited February 2010]. Available from: {https://nfais.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/MilesConradLectures/mc_lecture_2008.pdf}.
Napp, J.B. 2004. Survey of Library Services at Engineering News Record's Top 500 Design Firms: Implications for Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education 93(3):247-252.
Oxnam, M. 2003. The Informed Engineer: 33rd. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference FIE 5-8. Boulder, CO.
Tenopir, C. and King, D.W. 2003. Communication Patterns of Engineers. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
Tucci, V.K. 2009. Fee-based Abstracting and Indexing Services versus Free Federated Searching. Presented at the Fall 2009 American Chemical Society Meeting, Division of Chemical Information (CHMINF). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society August 17, 2009.
Tucci, V.K. 2010. Are A & I Services in a Death Spiral? Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. [Internet]. [Retrieved July 4, 2010]. Available from: http://www.istl.org/10-spring/viewpoint.html
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Valerie K. Tucci
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
