Faculty of 1000 and VIVO: Invisible Colleges and Team Science.

Authors

  • John Carey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1513

Abstract

Within the traditional model of scholarly communications, “invisible colleges” facilitate a process of social diffusion that fuels the growth of scientific specialties. This diffusion of ideas operates not through published journal articles but rather through informal communications between researchers. In recent years, researchers have availed themselves of collaborative Web 2.0 forums such as blogs, wikis, and social networking sites to meet their need for increasingly sophisticated vehicles of informal communication. Examinations of the database Faculty of 1000 and the semantic web application VIVO help to illustrate how invisible colleges have migrated to a networked environment where they can play an even stronger role within scholarly communications. This paper will argue that the enhanced social diffusion enabled by such collaborative online venues offers an opportunity for researchers globally to accelerate the pace of innovation in an increasingly open era of team science. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brooks, E., Case, C., Corson-Rikert, J., et al. 2010. National VIVO network: Implementation plan. [Internet]. [Cited 2011 Mar 11]. Available from {http://www.vivoweb.org/files/ImplementationPlan_8_6.pdf}

Crane, D. 1972. Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Falk-Krzesinski, H.J., Börner, K., Contractor, N., et al. 2010. Advancing the science of team science. Clinical and Translational Science 3: 263-266. [Internet]. [Cited 2011 Mar 11]. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00223.x/abstract

Gewin, V. 2010. Collaboration: Social networking seeks critical mass. Nature 468: 993-994.

Hagstrom, W.O. 1973. Book review: Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Contemporary Sociology 2(4): 382-383.

Holmes, K. 2010. VIVO: Enabling national networking of scientists. Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences News 3(3): 1-2.

London Royal Society. 2004. The Royal Society. [Internet]. [Cited 11 Mar 2011]. Available from: http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Societies/RS.html

Luce, R. & Di Giacomo, M. 2003. Personalized and collaborative digital library capabilities: Responding to the changing nature of scientific research. Science & Technology Libraries 24(1/2): 135-152.

Poynder, R. 2010. The impact of open notebook science: Interview with Jean-Claude Bradley. Information Today, 27(8): 1, 50-51.

Schaffner, A.C. 1994. The future of scientific journals: Lessons from the past. Information Technology and Libraries, 13(4): 239-248.

Suber, P. 2007. Trends favoring open access. CT Watch Quarterly, 3(3): 67-74.

Wagner, C. 2008. The new invisible college: Science for development. Washington, D.C.: Brooking Institution.

Wuchty, S., Jones, B.F., & Uzzi, B. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(18 May): 1036-1039.

Downloads

Published

2011-06-01

How to Cite

Carey, J. (2011). Faculty of 1000 and VIVO: Invisible Colleges and Team Science. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (65). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1513

Issue

Section

Board Accepted Articles
Share |