Laboratory Logistics: Strategies for Integrating Information Literacy Instruction into Science Laboratory Classes.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1587Abstract
Active learning is a hallmark of the traditional science laboratory class, making it a natural place for librarians to integrate active information literacy instruction. The course structure of science lab classes, particularly large entry-level undergraduate classes, can make the logistics of such integration a challenge. This paper presents two case studies, each highlighting a different method of providing information literacy instruction to large undergraduate science classes for non-majors. In the first, teaching assistants helped to provide instruction within scheduled lab periods; in the second, a set number of workshops occurred outside of the regular meeting times of the lab classes. To measure the success of these strategies, instructors, teaching assistants, and students provided formal and informal feedback. Evaluation of these results points to a third possible strategy for integrating library instruction into science lab classes. Moving librarian-led instruction online and reserving class time for activities mediated by teaching assistants may solve many of the logistical challenges to teaching information literacy in science labs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Downloads
References
American Library Association (ALA)/Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL)/Science and Technology Section (STS) Task Force on Information Literacy for Science and Technology.n.d. Information Literacy Standards for Science and Engineering/Technology. [Internet]. [Cited 2013 October 25]. Available from: {http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency}
Association of College and Research Libraries. 2000. Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. [Internet]. [Cited 2013 October 25] Available from: http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/standards.pdf
Bishop, J.L. 2013. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. 120th Annual ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; American Society for Engineering Education. [Internet]. [Cited 2013 August 7] Available from: http://www.asee.org/file_server/papers/attachment/file/0003/3259/6219.pdf
Bonwell, C.C. and Eisen, J.A. 1991. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.
Bowden, T.S. and DiBenedetto, A. 2001. Information literacy in a biology laboratory session: An example of librarian-faculty collaboration. Research Strategies 18(2): 143-149.
Carnduff, J. and Reid, N. 2003. Enhancing undergraduate chemistry laboratories: Pre-laboratory and post-laboratory exercises. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Common Curriculum Matrix. [Updated 2010 January]. Denver (CO): University of Denver. Available from: {file:///C:/Users/duda/Downloads/Common%20Curriculum%20Matrix.pdf}
Ferrer-Vincent, I. and Carello, C.A. 2008. Embedded library instruction in a first-year biology laboratory course. Science & Technology Libraries 28(4): 325-351.
Flint, L. 2013. 'Letting them loose!' A different approach to a biochemistry post-exam training session. Health Information and Libraries Journal 30(1): 83-87.
Fosmire, M. 2012. Information literacy and engineering design: Developing an integrated conceptual model. IFLA Journal 38(1): 47-52.
Fuselier, L. and Nelson, B. 2011. A test of the efficacy of an information literacy lesson in an introductory biology laboratory course with a strong science-writing component. Science & Technology Libraries 30(1): 58-75.
Hofstein, A. and Lunetta, V.N. 2004. The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education 88(1): 28-54.
Hsieh, C. and Knight, L. 2008. Problem-based learning for engineering students: An evidence-based comparative study. Journal of Academic Librarianship 34(1): 25-30.
Kearns, K. and Hybl, T.T. 2005. A collaboration between faculty and librarians to develop and assess a science literacy laboratory module. Science & Technology Libraries 25(4): 39-56.
MacMillan, D. 2010. Sequencing genetics information: Integrating data into information literacy for undergraduate biology students. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship [Internet]. [Cited 2013 August 7];61. Available from: http://www.istl.org/10-spring/refereed3.html
Martin, R.R. 1986. Library instruction and the scientific method: A role for librarians in an introductory biology course. Research Strategies 4(3): 108-15.
Peters, M.C. 2011. Beyond Google: Integrating chemical information into the undergraduate chemistry and biochemistry curriculum. Science & Technology Libraries 30(1): 80-88.
Petzold, J., Winterman, B., and Montooth, K. 2010. Science seeker: A new model for teaching information literacy to entry-level biology undergraduates. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship [Internet]. [Cited 2013 August 7];63. Available from: http://www.istl.org/10-fall/refereed2.html
Prince, M. 2004. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education 93(3): 223-231.
Quick Facts. [Updated 2012]. Denver (CO): University of Denver. [Internet]. Available from: {http://www.du.edu/apply/admission/quickfacts.html}
Quigley, B.D. and McKenzie, J. 2003. Connecting engineering students with the library: A case study in active learning. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship [Internet]. [Cited 2013 August 7];37. Available from: http://www.istl.org/03-spring/article2.html
Reid, N. and Shah, I. 2007. The role of laboratory work in university chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 8(2): 172-185.
Samson, S. and Millet, M.S. 2003. The learning environment: First-year students, teaching assistants, and information literacy. Research Strategies 19(2): 84-98.
Schuetz, C. 2009. Not your parents' chemistry class: Integrating library skills into the organic chemistry lab. College & Research Libraries News 70(9): 522-525.
Shannon, S. and Winterman, B. 2012. Student comprehension of primary literature is aided by companion assignments emphasizing pattern recognition and information literacy. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship [Internet]. [Cited 2013 August 7]; 68. Available from: http://www.istl.org/12-winter/refereed3.html
Sult, L. and Mills, V. 2006. A blended method for integrating information literacy instruction into English composition classes. Reference Services Review 34(3): 368-388.
Valenza, J. 2012. The flipping librarian. Teacher Librarian 40(2): 22-25.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Kathleen Gregory
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
