Factors in Science Journal Cancellation Projects: The Roles of Faculty Consultations and Data.

Authors

  • Jeanine Williamson
  • Peter Fernandez
  • Lana Dixon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1618

Abstract

The economic downturn of 2007-08 forced many academic libraries in the United States to cancel journals. We surveyed life sciences librarians from ARL libraries to find out about their experiences with journal cancellations during 2008-12. Overall, we discovered that two factors were essential in decision-making: faculty consultations and data. While faculty consultations and data have always been influential in journal cancellations, our survey allowed us to explore what roles these two factors played in the recent period of necessary reductions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bosch, S. & Henderson, K. 2014. Steps down the evolutionary road: Periodicals price survey 2014. Library Journal 139(7):32-37.

Broude, J. 1978. Journal deselection in an academic environment: A comparison of faculty and librarian choices. The Serials Librarian 3(2):147-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v03n02_05

Bucknell, T. & Stanley, T. 2002. Design and implementation of a periodicals voting exercise at Leeds University Library. Serials 15(2):153-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/15153

Business Cycle Dating Committee. 2008. Determination of the December 2007 peak in economic activity [Internet]. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available from: http://www.nber.org/cycles/dec2008.html

Carey, R., Elfstrand, S. & Hijleh, R. 2005. An evidence-based approach for gaining faculty acceptance in a serials cancellation project. Collection Management 31(1/2):59-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J105v30n02_05

Clement, S., Gillespie, G., Tusa, S. & Blake, J. 2008. Collaboration and organization for successful serials cancellation. The Serials Librarian 54(3-4):229-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260801974172

Creaser, C. & White, S. 2008. Trends in journal prices: An analysis of selected journals, 2000-2006. Learned Publishing 21(3) 214-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1087/095315108X323866

Curran, R. 2008. U.S. entered a recession a year ago, NBER says. Wall Street Journal [Internet]. Available from: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB122815252673269395

Dess, H.M. 1998. Gauging faculty utilization of science journals. Science & Technology Libraries 16(3-4):171-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J122v16n03_11

Dewland, J. & Minihan, J. 2011. Collective serials analysis: The relevance of a journal in supporting teaching and research. Technical Services Quarterly 28(3):265-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2011.571588

Enssle, H.R. & Wilde, M.L. 2002. So you have to cancel journals? Statistics that help. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 26(3):259-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-9055(02)00254-3

Foudy, G. & McManus, A. 2005. Using a decision grid process to build consensus in electronic resources cancellation decisions. Journal of Academic Librarianship 31(6):533-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2005.08.005

Galbraith, B. 2002. Journal retention decisions incorporating use-statistics as a measure of value. Collection Management 27(1):79-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J105v27n01_06

Gallagher, J., Bauer, K. & Dollar, D.M. 2005. Evidence-based librarianship: Utilizing data from all available sources to make judicious print cancellation decisions. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services 29(2):169-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2005.04.004

Garczynski, J. 2011. Making the cut: Do faculty want to be involved in library database cancellations? Practical Academic Librarianship: The International Journal of the SLA Academic Division 1(1):16-27.

Kennedy, K., Cataldo, T.T., Davis, V., Gonzalez, S.R. & Newsom, C. 2008. Evaluating continuing resources: Perspectives and methods from science librarians. The Serials Librarian 55(3) 428-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260802059064

Laakso, M. & Bjork, B.C. 2012. Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine 10:9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-124

Li, X. & Kopper, C. 2005. Cancellation of print journals in the electronic era: A case study. Against the Grain 17(6):1-1, 18, 20, 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.4587

Nixon, J.M. 2010. A reprise, or round three: Using a database management program as a decision-support system for the cancellation of serials. The Serials Librarian 59(3-4):302-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03615261003619086

Pinfield, S., Salter, J., Bath, P.A., Hubbard, B., Millington, P., Anders, J.H.S. & Hussain, A. 2014. Open-access repositories worldwide, 2005-2012: Past growth, current characteristics, and future possibilities. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23131

Richards, D.T. & Prelec, A. 1993. Serials cancellation projects: Necessary evil or collection assessment opportunity? Journal of Library Administration 17(2):31-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J111v17n02_04

Rupp-Serrano, K., Robbins, S. & Cain, D. 2002. Canceling print serials in favor of electronic: criteria for decision making. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 26(4):369-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-9055(02)00274-9

Sinha, R., Tucker, C. & Scherlen, A. 2005. Finding the delicate balance: Serials assessment at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Serials Review 31(2):120-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2005.02.002

Spencer, J.S. & Millson-Martula, C. 2006. Serials cancellations in college and small university libraries the national scene. The Serials Librarian 49(4):135-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v49n04_10

Sprague, N. & Chambers, M.B. 2000. Full text databases and the journal cancellation process: A case study. Serials Review 26(3):19-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-7913(00)00074-5

Staggs-Neel, J. 2006. A serials cancellation project at the University of Kentucky. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information 7(2/3):57-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J108v07n02_05

Tucker, B.E. 1995. The journal deselection project: the LSUMC-S experience. Library Acquisitions: Practice and Theory 19(3):313-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-6408(95)00025-5

Walter, P.L. 1990. Doing the unthinkable: Cancelling journals at a research library. The Serials Librarian 18(1-2):141-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v18n01_11

Ward, R.K., Christensen, J.O. & Spackman, E. 2006. A systematic approach for evaluating and upgrading academic science journal collections. Serials Review 32(1):4-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2005.12.001

Ware, M. 2006. ALPSP Survey of Librarians on Factors in Journal Cancellation. Worthing, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-01

How to Cite

Williamson, J., Fernandez, P., & Dixon, L. (2014). Factors in Science Journal Cancellation Projects: The Roles of Faculty Consultations and Data. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (78). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1618

Issue

Section

Refereed Articles
Share |