Information Literacy in the Lab: Graduate Teaching Experiences in First-Year Biology.

Authors

  • Catherine Lantz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1689

Abstract

The author interviewed 10 graduate teaching assistants leading lab sessions for first-year biology about how they introduce students to scientific literature. Qualitative data analysis of the interview transcripts revealed that both first-year students and graduate teaching assistants (many of whom are first-year teachers) struggle with information literacy concepts involved in searching for and evaluating scientific literature. I discuss possible ways that librarians can help. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Doody, O. & Noonan, M. 2013. Preparing and conducting interviews to collect data. Nurse Researcher 20(5), 28-32. doi:10.7748/nr2013.05.20.5.28.e327

French, D. & Russell, C. 2002. Do graduate teaching assistants benefit from teaching inquiry-based laboratories? Bioscience 52(11), 1036-41. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[1036:DGTABF]2.0.CO;2

Fuselier, L. & Nelson, B. 2011. A test of the efficacy of an information literacy lesson in an introductory biology laboratory course with a strong science-writing component. Science & Technology Libraries 30(1), 58-75. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2011.547101

Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine. P. 35-43.

Gregory, K. 2013. Laboratory logistics: Strategies for integrating information literacy instruction into science laboratory classes. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship (74). doi:10.5062/F49G5JSJ

Hartman, P., Newhouse, R. & Perry, V. 2014. Building a sustainable life science information literacy program using the train-the-trainer model. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship (77). doi:10.5062/F4G15XTM

Jacklin, M. L. & Robinson, K. 2013. Evolution of various library instruction strategies: Using student feedback to create and enhance online active learning assignments. Partnership 8(1), 1-21. doi:10.21083/partnership.v8i1.2499

Kuruppu, P.U. & Gruber, A.M. 2006. Understanding the information needs of academic scholars in agricultural and biological sciences. Journal of Academic Librarianship 32(6), 609-623. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2006.08.001

Luft, J.A., Kurdziel, J.P., Roehrig, G.H. & Turner, J. 2004. Growing a garden without water: Graduate teaching assistants in introductory science laboratories at a doctoral/research university. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41(3), 211-233. doi:10.1002/tea.20004

Miller, L.N. 2011. University biology patrons in the library literature 2000-2010: A content analysis & literature review. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library & Information Practice & Research 6(1), 1-20. doi:10.21083/partnership.v6i1.1400

Spackman, E. 2007. Utilizing focus groups to evaluate an information literacy program in a general biology course. Science & Technology Libraries 27(3), 3-28. doi:10.1300/J122v27n03_02

Sundberg, M.D., Armstrong, J.E. & Wischusen, E.W. 2005. A reappraisal of the status of introductory biology laboratory education in U.S. colleges & universities. American Biology Teacher 67(9), 525-529. doi:10.2307/4451904

Downloads

Published

2016-12-01

How to Cite

Lantz, C. (2016). Information Literacy in the Lab: Graduate Teaching Experiences in First-Year Biology. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (85). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1689

Issue

Section

Refereed Articles
Share |