Construction and Contextualization of Authority in STEM Fields: An Exploratory Paper.


  • Rebecca Kuglitsch
  • Julia R. Bordeaux



In this paper, we explore how librarians can teach students to deconstruct the concept of authority using questions and considering contextual needs in STEM fields. We argue that examining the complexities of common signifiers of authority, such as peer review, citation rates, and types of sources, as well as exploring contextual factors such as authority in academic and professional settings, are key to developing an understanding of the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy Frame "Authority is constructed and contextual" in the sciences. For each signifier of authority, we present ways to approach and discuss the question in the classroom. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]


Download data is not yet available.


ACRL. 2015. Framework for information literacy for higher education | Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL). [accessed 2015 Sep 21].

Brown, C. & Krumholz, L.R. 2002. Integrating information literacy into the science curriculum. College & Research Libraries 63:111-123. DOI: 10.5860/crl.63.2.111

Campbell, H. 2014 Jul 13. The corruption of peer review is harming scientific credibility. Wall Street Journal. [accessed 2016 Nov 3].

Carncross, M. 2015. Redeveloping a course with the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education: From skills to process. College & Research Libraries News 76:248-273. DOI: 10.5860/crln.76.5.9309

Clairoux, N., Desbiens, S., Clar, M., Dupont, P. & St-Jean, M. 2013. Integrating information literacy in health sciences curricula: a case study from Québec. Health Information & Libraries Journal 30:201-211. DOI: 10.1111/hir.12025

Douglas, K.A., Epps, A.S.V., Mihalec-Adkins, B., Fosmire, M. & Purzer, S. 2015. A comparison of beginning and advanced engineering students' description of information skills. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 10:127-143. DOI: 10.18438/B8TK5Z

Elmborg, J. 2006. Critical information literacy: Implications for instructional practice. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 32:192-199. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2005.12.004

Fosmire, M. 2012. Information literacy and engineering design: Developing an integrated conceptual model. IFLA Journal 38:47-52. DOI: 10.1177/0340035211435071

Fosmire, M. & Radcliffe, D. 2012. Knowledge-enabled engineering design: Toward an integrated model. Proceedings of the ASEE National Conference.

Gøtzsche, P.C., Hróbjartsson, A., Johansen, H.K., Haahr, M.T., Altman, D.G. & Chan, A-W. 2007. Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials. PLOS Medicine 4:e19. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040019

Grafstein, A. 2002. A discipline-based approach to information literacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship 28:197. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-1333(02)00283-5

Head, A. 2012. Learning curve: How college graduates solve information problems once they join the workplace. Project Information Literacy. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2165031

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [ICMJE]. Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. [accessed 2016 Dec 29].

Ioannidis, J.P.A. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine 2:e124. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Jabbehdari, S. & Walsh, J.P. 2017 Mar 20. Authorship norms and project structures in science. Science, Technology, & Human Values :0162243917697192. DOI: 10.1177/0162243917697192

Kaplan, S. 2015 Aug 18. Major publisher retracts 64 scientific papers in fake peer review outbreak. Washington Post. [accessed 2016 Nov 3].

Kuglitsch, R.Z. 2015. Teaching for transfer: Reconciling the Framework with disciplinary information literacy. portal: Libraries and the Academy 15:457-470. DOI: 10.1353/pla.2015.0040

Longino, H. 2015. The social dimensions of scientific knowledge. In: Zalta, E.N., editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2015. [accessed 2015 Jul 2].

Manuel, K. 2004. Generic and discipline-specific information literacy competencies. Science & Technology Libraries 24:279-308. DOI: 10.1300/J122v24n03_05

Scaramozzino, J.M. 2010. Integrating STEM information competencies into an undergraduate curriculum. Journal of Library Administration 50:315-333. DOI: 10.1080/01930821003666981

Science Careers Forum - Biotech, Pharmaceutical, Faculty, Postdoc jobs on Science Careers. [accessed 2017 Jul 7].

Souchek, R. & Meier, M. 1997. Teaching information literacy and scientific process skills: An integrated approach. College Teaching 45:128-131. DOI: 10.1080/87567559709596213

Van Noorden, R. 2011. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions. Nature 478:26-28. DOI: 10.1038/478026a

Venkatraman, V. 2010. Conventions of scientific a uthorship. Science Careers. [accessed 2017 Jul 7].

Wilkinson, L. 2014. The problem with threshold concepts. Sense & Reference. [accessed 2015 May 15].

Yatcilla, J.K. & Fosmire, M. 2014. Research in the sciences. In: Keeran, P. & Levine-Clark, M., editors. Research within the Disciplines: Foundations for Reference and Library Instruction. 2 edition. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.




How to Cite

Kuglitsch, R., & Bordeaux, J. R. (2017). Construction and Contextualization of Authority in STEM Fields: An Exploratory Paper. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (87).



Refereed Articles