Managing Research Data: Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Researcher Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1725Abstract
The authors conducted six focus group semi-structured interviews consisting of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers within the College of Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) in order to understand their roles within research groups and their ability to manage research data. More specifically, participants were asked how they manage, organize, and describe data, as well as the challenges they face in these activities. This study revealed graduate students primarily discuss managing research data in terms of the software they use and that their focus is task specific. Additionally, the language and concepts librarians use in conversations about data management creates a barrier to understanding for graduate students. This study confirms that there is a significant disconnect between the faculty members who design and direct research projects and the graduate students and postdoctoral researchers that do the front-line work. This study helped identify that more data management engagement, interaction, and instruction within research groups is needed. Acknowledging this will allow librarians to develop more meaningful data management instruction and enhance the research data support services provided to faculty.
Downloads
References
Adamick, J., Reznik-Zellen R.C. & Sheridan, M. 2013. Data management training for graduate students at a large research university. Journal of eScience Librarianship 1(3):e1022. doi: 10.7191/jeslib.2012.1022
Akers, K.G. & Doty, J. 2012. Differences among faculty ranks in views on research data management. IASSIST Quarterly 36(2):16-20. Available from: http://www.iassistdata.org/sites/default/files/iqvol36_2_doty.pdf
Akers, K.G. & Doty, J. 2013. Disciplinary differences in faculty research data management practices and perspectives. International Journal of Digital Curation 8(2):5-26. doi: 10.2218/ijdc.v8i2.263
Barbour, R.S. 2014. Analysing focus groups. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, 313-326. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2014. doi: 10.4135/9781446282243
Berg, B.L. & Lune, H. 2012. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Upper Saddle River, (NJ):Pearson Education, Inc . 8th edition.
Briney, K., Goben, A. & Zilinski, L. 2015. Do you have an institutional data policy? A review of the current landscape of library data services and institutional data policies. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication 3(2):1-25. doi: 10.7710/2162-3309.1232
Buys, C.M. & Shaw, P.L. 2015. Data management practices across an institution: Survey and report. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication 3(2):1-24. doi: 10.7710/2162-3309.1225
Carlson, J., Fosmire, M., Miller, C.C. & Nelson, M.S. 2011. Determining data information literacy needs: A study of students and research faculty. portal: Libraries and the Academy 11(2):629-657. doi: 10.1353/pla.2011.0022
Carlson, J. & Bracke, M.S. 2013. Data management and sharing from the perspective of graduate students: An examination of the culture and practice at the water quality field station. portal: Libraries & the Academy 13(4):343-361. doi: 10.1353/pla.2013.0034
Carlson, J., Johnston, L., Westra, B. & Nichols, M. 2013. Developing an approach for data management education: A report from the Data Information Literacy Project. The International Journal of Digital Curation 8(1):204-217. doi: 10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.254
Diekema, A.R., Wesolek, A. & Walters, C.D. 2014. The NSF/NIH effect: Surveying the effect of data management requirements on faculty, sponsored programs, and institutional repositories. Journal of Academic Librarianship 40(3-4):322-331. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.04.010
Frank, E.P. & Pharo, N. 2016. Academic librarians in data information literacy instruction: A case study in meteorology. College and Research Libraries 77(4). doi: 10.5860/crl.77.4.536
Future of Privacy Forum. 2017. Understanding corporate data sharing decisions: Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities for Sharing corporate data with researchers. [Internet] https://fpf.org/2017/11/14/understanding-corporate-data-sharing-decisions-practices-challenges-and-opportunities-for-sharing-corporate-data-with-researchers/
Jahnke, L., Asher, A. & Keralis, S.D.C. 2012. The Problem of Data. Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR) Report, pub. #154. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/fac_pubs/52/
Johnston, L. & Jeffryes, J. 2014. Data management skills needed by structural engineering students: Case study at the University of Minnesota. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 140(2). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000154
Marcus, C., Ball, S., Deserone, L., Hribar, A. & Loftus, W. 2007. Understanding research behaviors, information resources, and service needs of scientistis and graduate students: A study by the Univesity of Minnesota. [Internet] Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11299/5546
Mattern, E., Wei, J., Daquing, H., Lyon, L. & Brenner, A. 2015. Using Participatory Design and Visusal Narrative Inquiry to Investigate Researchers, Data Challenges and Recommendations for Library Research Data Services. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 49(4):408-423. doi: 10.1108/PROG-01-2015-0012
McLure, M., Level, A.V., Cranston, C.L., Oehlerts B. & Culbertson, M. 2014. Data curation: A study of researcher practices and needs. portal: Libraries & the Academy 14(2):139-164. doi: 10.1353/pla.2014.0009
Mohr, A.H., Bishoff, J., Bishoff ,C., Braun, S., Storino, C. & Johnston, L.R. 2015. When data is a dirty word: A survey to understand data management needs across diverse research disciplines. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology 42(1):51-53. doi: 10.1002/bul2.2015.1720420114
NASA. 2011. Data & Information Policy, NASA, Washington, DC. Available online at http://science.nasa.gov/earth-science/
Peters, C. & Dryden, A.R. 2011. Assessing the academic library's role in campus-wide research data management: A first step at the university of Houston. Science & Technology Libraries 30(4):387-403. doi: 10.1080/0194262X.2011.626340
Piwowar H.A. 2011. Who shares? Who doesn't? Factors associated with openly archiving raw research data. PLoS ONE 6(7):1-13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018657
Sharma, S. & Qin, J. 2014. Data management: Graduate student's awareness of practices and policies. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science & Technology 51(1):1-3. doi: 10.1002/meet.2014.14505101130
Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A.U., Wu, L., Read, E., Manoff, M. & Frame, M. 2011. Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. Plos One 6(6). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
Valentino, M & Boock, M. 2015. Data management services in academic libraries: A case study at Oregon State University. Practical Academic Librarianship: The International Journal of the SLA Academic Division 5(2). https://journals.tdl.org/pal/index.php/pal/article/view/7001/6098
Weller, T. & Monroe-Gulick, A. 2014. Understanding methodological and disciplinary differences in the data practices of academic researchers. Library Hi Tech 32(3):467-482. doi: 10.1108/LHT-02-2014-0021
Weller, T. & Monroe-Gulick, A. 2015. Differences in the data practices, challenges, and future needs of graduate students and faculty members. Journal of eScience Librarianship 4(1):e1070. doi: 10.7191/jeslib.2015.1070
Wiley, C.A. & Mischo, W.H. 2016. Data management practices and perspectives of atmospheric scientists and engineering faculty. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship 85. doi: 10.5062/F43X84NJ
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Christie Wiley, Erin E. Kerby

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
While ISTL has always been open access and authors have always retained the copyright of their papers without restrictions, articles in issues prior to no.75 were not licensed with Creative Commons licenses. Since issue no. 75 (Winter 2014), ISTL has licensed its work through Creative Commons licenses. Please refer to the Copyright and Licensing Information page for more information.


