Glory Days: Managing Scientific Journals in a Liberal Arts College.

Authors

  • Julie Miran
  • Norm Medeiros

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1856

Abstract

Proliferation of online access to primary literature has provided great opportunities for science libraries. Merging these resources with previously held formats, and negotiating with vendors for this access, remains a challenge at many institutions, regardless of size. This article highlights Haverford College's attempts to integrate these resources in an effort to enhance accessibility and to reduce costs inherent in this duplication of formats. Areas addressed include material formats, faculty and department cultures, consortial arrangements, users' habits, implications for the online catalog, financial imperatives and communication patterns between our main and branch libraries. Initiatives currently underway are highlighted, as well as indications of how they will shape our future behaviors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bazillion, R. 2001. Academic libraries in the digital revolution. Educause Quarterly 24(1):51-55.

Christie, A. and Kristick, L. 2001. Developing an online science journal collection: a quick tool for assigning priorities. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 30 [Online]. Available: http://www.istl.org/01-spring/article2.html [August 13, 2001].

Frazier, K. 2001. The librarians' dilemma: contemplating the "big deal." D-Lib Magazine 7(3) [Online]. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march01/frazier/03frazier.html [August 13, 2001].

Goodman, D. 2000. Should scientific journals be printed? A personal view. Online Information Review 24(5):357-363.

Hurd, J.M. 2000. Serials management: adrift in a sea of change? Journal of Library Administration 28(2):77-89.

Lougee, W.P. 2000. Scholarly journals in the late 20th century. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services. 24:239-250.

Montgomery, C.H. 2000. Measuring the impact of an electronic journal collection on library costs: a framework and preliminary observations. D-Lib Magazine. 6(10) [Online]. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october00/montgomery/10montgomery.html [May 7, 2001].

Okerson, A. 1991. The electronic journal: what, whence, and when? Public-Access Computer Systems Review. 2(1) [Online] Available: {http://epress.lib.uh.edu/pr/v2/n1/okerson.2n1} [May 15, 2001].

Searing, S.E. and Estabrook, L.S. 2000. The future of scientific publishing on the web: insights from focus groups of chemists. Portal: Libraries and the Academy. 1(1):77-96.

Sprague, N. and Chambers, M.B. 2000. Full-text databases and the journal cancellation process: a case study. Serials Review. 26(3):19-31.

Stevens, R.E. 1971. The microform revolution. Library Resources & Technical Services. 19(3):379-395.

Tenopir, C. and King, D.W. 2000. Towards electronic journals: realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers. Washington, DC: Special Libraries Association.

Wood, P.A. and Walther, J.H. 2000. The future of academic libraries: changing formats and changing delivery. The bottom line: managing library finances. 13(4):173-181.

Downloads

Published

2001-09-13

How to Cite

Miran, J., & Medeiros, N. (2001). Glory Days: Managing Scientific Journals in a Liberal Arts College. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (31). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1856

Issue

Section

Board Accepted Articles
Share |