Making Choices: Factors in the Selection of Information Resources Among Science Faculty at the University of Michigan Results of a Survey Conducted July-September, 2000.

Authors

  • Jane Quigley
  • David R. Peck
  • Sara Rutter
  • Elizabeth McKee Williams

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1887

Abstract

We carried out a survey of 230 science faculty and researchers at the University of Michigan in the departments of astronomy, biology, chemistry, geology, mathematics, natural resources, physics, and statistics, seeking to learn about their information resource use and preferences in diverse research contexts (e.g., current awareness, routine day-to-day information needs). The response rate was 46.5%. Results indicate that researchers rely largely on the same information-seeking tools in different research contexts. We also asked about the importance of six factors -- speed, convenience, familiarity, currency, authoritativeness, reliable availability -- on their information resource preferences; convenience and time were most frequently cited. Finally, open-ended questions invited respondents to comment on barriers and frustrations they encountered in information-seeking; themes of availability and access to needed material were mentioned, in addition to a wide variety of information retrieval difficulties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, C. M. 1999. Information Seeking Behavior of Scientists in the Electronic Information Age: Astronomers, Chemists, Mathematicians, and Physicists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50(10): 929-43.

Crawford, S. Y., Hurd, J. M., & Weller, A. C. 1996. From Print to Electronic: The Transformation of Scientific Communication. Medford, NJ: American Society for Information Science.

Martyn, J. 1987. Literature Searching Habits and Attitudes of Research Scientists. British Library Research Paper no. 14. London: British Library Research and Development Department.

Maughan, P. D. 1999. Library Resources and Services: A Cross-Disciplinary Survey of Faculty and Graduate Student Use and Satisfaction. Journal of Academic Librarianship 25(5): 354-366.

Orr, R. H. 1970. The Scientist as an Information Processor: A Conceptual Model Illustrated with Data on Variables Related to Library Utilization. In C. E. Nelson & D. K. Pollock (Eds.), Communication Among Scientists and Engineers. Lexington, Mass.: Heath Lexington.

Preprint Policy. 2001. Chemical & Engineering News 79(3).

Smith, E. 1990. The Librarian, the Scholar, and the Future of the Research Library. New York, NY: Greenwood.

Soper, M. E. 1976. Characteristics and Use of Personal Collections. Library Quarterly 46(4): 397-415.

Von Seggern, M. 1995. Scientists, Information Seeking, and Reference Services. The Reference Librarian. 49-50:95-104.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2002-05-20

How to Cite

Quigley, J., Peck, D. R., Rutter, S., & Williams, E. M. (2002). Making Choices: Factors in the Selection of Information Resources Among Science Faculty at the University of Michigan Results of a Survey Conducted July-September, 2000. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (34). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1887
Share |