Scholarly Communication: The Use and Non-Use of E-Print Archives for the Dissemination of Scientific Information
Theme: Digital Archiving
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1918Abstract
This study surveyed a randomly chosen sample from a population of 240,000 scholars in nine scientific disciplines from private and public colleges and universities across the United States and Canada. The disciplines included physics/astronomy, chemistry, mathematics/computer science, engineering, cognitive science/psychology, and biological sciences. The survey sought to determine use and non-use of e-print archives in the different disciplines. Results show that 18 percent of the researchers use at least one archive while 82 percent do not use any. Scholars in physics use e-print archives the most and chemistry the least. ArXiv receives the most use and authors' web sites the least use. Reasons for use include dissemination of research results, visibility, and exposure of authors. Reasons for non-use include publishers' policies and technology constraints.
Downloads
References
Association of Research Libraries (ARL). 2000. Principles for emerging systems of scholarly publishing. ARL Newsletter. [Online]. Available: {http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/tempe/index.shtml} [November 8, 2002].
Bellis, Mary. 2002. Fax, fax machine and facsimile invention. [Online]. Available: http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/blfax.htm [November 8, 2002.]
Brown, Cecelia. 2001. The coming of age of e-prints in the literature of physics. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 31. [Online]. Available: http://www.istl.org/01-summer/refereed.html [November 8, 2002].
Buckholtz, Alison. 2001. Returning scientific publishing to scientists. Journal of Electronic Publishing 7(1). [Online]. Available: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/07-01/buckholtz.html [November 8, 2002].
Case, Mary M. 2001. The impact of serial costs on library collections. ARL Newsletter (218):9. [Online]. Available: {http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/costimpact.pdf} [November 8, 2002].
Eisen, Michael and Pat Brown. 2001. Should scientific literature be privately owned and controlled? Nature webdebates. [Online]. Available: http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/Eisen.htm [November 8, 2002].
Folster, Mary B. 1995. Information seeking patterns: social sciences. Reference Librarian 49/50:83-93.
Gould, Constance C. and Pearce, Karla. 1991. Information Needs in the Sciences: an Assessment. Mountain View, California: Research Library Group.
Harnad, S. 2000. Ingelfinger over-ruled: The role of the web in the future of refereed medical journal publishing. Lancet Perspectives 256 (December supplement: s16). [Online]. Available: { http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad00.lancet.htm} [November 8, 2002].
________. 2001. The Self archiving initiative. Nature webdebates. [Online]. Available: http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/harnad.html [November 8, 2002].
Karow, Julia. 2001. Publish free or perish. Scientific American April 23. [Online]. Available: {http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=publish-free-or-perish&catID=4&pageNumber=1} [November 8, 2002].
Marshall, Eliot. 1998. Good, bad, or necessary evil? Science 282 (5390): 860-867.
________. 1999. Varmus defends E-biomed proposal, prepares to push ahead. Science 284 (5423): 2062-2063.
Mellman, Ira. 2001. Setting logical priorities. Nature webdebates. [Online]. Available: { http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/mellman.html} [November 8, 2002].
National Science Board. 2002. Doctoral scientists and engineers in academia. In Science and Engineering Indicators. Washington D.C.: National Science Board. [Online]. Available: {https://wayback.archive-it.org/5902/20150818085944/http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind02/c5/c5s2.htm} [November 8, 2002].
Primack, Alice Lefler. 1992. Journal literature of the Physical Sciences: A Manual. Metuchen, N. J.: Scarecrow Press.
Warnick, Walter. 2001 Tailoring access to the source: preprints, grey literature and journal articles. Nature webdebates. [Online]. Available: http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/warnick.html [November 8, 2002].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
While ISTL has always been open access and authors have always retained the copyright of their papers without restrictions, articles in issues prior to no.75 were not licensed with Creative Commons licenses. Since issue no. 75 (Winter 2014), ISTL has licensed its work through Creative Commons licenses. Please refer to the Copyright and Licensing Information page for more information.
