Developing an Information Skills Curriculum for the Sciences
Theme: Information Literacy for Science & Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1936Abstract
Information literacy, an important conceptual framework for library instruction, needs to be embedded within a disciplinary context. Discipline-specific literacy in the sciences is valuable because it establishes meaning and context for learners, is based on the structure of knowledge and information-seeking practices within the sciences, and takes into account subject-specific tools, resources, and methods of searching. Curriculum-integrated instruction provides an optimal approach, in both planning and implementation, to helping science students develop general and discipline-specific information skills. This paper describes a curriculum-based approach for the strategic planning of information skills instruction in the sciences. This approach incorporates an understanding of the information skills needed at various points during the scientific education process; awareness of public and professional policies, standards, and recommendations for science education; and an awareness of trends and methods in science education. Relevant resources for planning are presented. A description of the scientific education process provides a framework for a generalized information skills curriculum in the sciences. The curriculum is presented as an aid to planning and as a stimulus to further dialogue and standards development in the area of information literacy in the sciences.
Downloads
References
ACRL: Association of College and Research Libraries. 2002. Information literacy competency standards for higher education. [Online]. Available: http://www.ala.org/acrl/ilintro.html [March 27, 2003].
ACRL: Association of College and Research Libraries. 2000. Information literacy competency standards for higher education: standards, performance indicators, and outcomes. [Online]. Available: {http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.cfm} [May 22, 2003].
Arp, L. & Woodard, B.S. 2002. Recent trends in information literacy and instruction. Reference & User Services Quarterly 42(2):124-132.
Barry, C.A. 1997. Information skills for an electronic world: training doctoral research students. Journal of Information Science 23(3):225-238.
Belefant-Miller, H. & King, D.W. 2001. How, what and why science faculty read. Science & Technology Libraries 19(2):91-112.
Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. 1998. Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities. [Online]. Available: {http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED424840.pdf} [March 31, 2003].
Bowden, T.S. & DiBenedetto, A. 2002. Information literacy in a biology laboratory session. An example of librarian-faculty collaboration. Research Strategies 18:143-149.
Bracke, M.S. & Critz, L.J. 2001. Re-envisioning instruction for the electronic environment of a 21st century science-engineering library. Science & Technology Libraries 21(2/3):97-106.
Bracken Health Sciences Library. 1999. The evolution of curriculum integrated information literacy in the health sciences at Queen's University. [Online]. Available: {http://library.queensu.ca/webmed/evolution.html} [April 2, 2003].
Breivik, P.S. 1998. Student Learning in the Information Age. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education/Oryx Press.
Brown, C. & Krumholz, L.R. 2002. Integrating information literacy into the science curriculum. College & Research Libraries 62(2):111-123.
Bruce, C. 1997. The Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Adelaide: Auslib Press.
Carder, L., Willingham, P. & Bibb, D. 2001. Case-based, problem-based learning. Information literacy for the real world. Research Strategies 18(3):181-190.
Carr, C. & Somerville, A. 1994. The 'Ideal Chemical Information Curriculum.' [Online]. Available: {https://web.archive.org/web/20160405002658/http://www.indiana.edu/~cheminfo/40-02.html} [Oct. 13, 2000].
Courtois, M.P. & Handel, M.A. 1998. A collaborative approach to teaching genetics information sources. Research Strategies 16(3):211-220.
Dorner, J.L., Taylor, S.E. & Hodson-Carlton, K. 2001. Faculty-librarian collaboration for nursing information literacy: a tiered approach. Reference Services Review 29(2):132-140.
Feder, T. 2000. Study calls for better conditions for postdocs. Physics Today 53(11):46-47.
Fjallbrant, J. & Levy, P. 1999. Information literacy courses in engineering and science-the design and implementation of the DEDICATE courses. IATUL Proceedings. [Online]. Available: {http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED433822.pdf} [April 24, 2003].
Gonzalez, C. 2001. Undergraduate research, graduate mentoring, and the university's mission. Science 293(August 31):1624-1626.
Grafstein, A. 2002. A discipline-based approach to information literacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 28(4):197-204.
Harrill, R.W. 2000. Evolving curricula in the new century: putting universities back in touch -- a prototype program that links the community and the institution. Journal of College Science Teaching 29(6):401-407.
Haynes, E.B. 1996. Librarian-faculty partnerships in instruction. Advances in Librarianship 20:191-222.
Henderson, L. & Buising, C. 2000. A peer-reviewed assignment for large classes: honing students' writing skills in a collaborative endeavor. Journal of College Science Teaching 30(2):109-113.
Herro, S.J. 2000. Bibliographic instruction and critical thinking. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 43(6):554-558.
Houde, A. 2000. Student symposia on primary research articles: a window into the world of scientific research. Journal of College Science Teaching 30(3):184-187.
Huerta, D. & McMillan, V.E. 2000. Collaborative instruction by writing and library faculty: A two-tiered approach to the teaching of scientific writing. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship Fall 2000. [Online]. Available: http://www.istl.org/00-fall/article1.html [December 4, 2000].
Isaak, D.J. & Hubert, W.A. 1999. Catalyzing the transition from student to scientist -- a model for graduate research training. Bioscience 49(4):321-326.
Kohl, D.K. 1995. As time goes by: revisiting fundamentals. Library Trends 44(2):423-29.
Kotter, W.R. 1999. Bridging the great divide: improving relations between librarians and classroom faculty. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 25(4):294-303.
Laherty, J. 2000. Promoting information literacy programs for science education programs: correlating the National Science Education Content Standards with the Association of College and Research Libraries Information Competency Standards for Higher Education. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship Fall 2000. [Online]. Available: http://www.istl.org/00-fall/article3.html [March 8, 2003].
Lawal, I.O. 2001. Integrating chemical information into the undergraduate curriculum: information literacy and a change in pedagogy. Science and Technology Libraries 20(1):43-57.
Leckie, G.J. & Fullerton, A. 1999. Information literacy in science and engineering undergraduate education: faculty attitudes and pedagogical practices. College & Research Libraries 60(1):9-29.
Lee, W.M. & Wiggins, G. 1997. Alternative methods for teaching chemical information to undergraduates. Science & Technology Libraries 16(3/4):31-43.
Lin, P. 1999. Core information competencies defined: a study of the information education of engineers. [Online]. Available: {http://web.archive.org/web/20051221080639/http://www.arl.org/diversity/leading/issue11/popinglin.html} [March 31, 2003].
MacDonald, M.C., Rathemacher, A.J. & Burkhardt, J.M. 2000. Challenges in building an incremental, multi-year information literacy plan. Reference Services Review 28(3):240-247.
Mangurian, L., Feldman, S., Clements, J. & Boucher, L. 2001. Analyzing and communicating scientific information: a Towson Transition Course to hone students' scientific skills. Journal of College Science Teaching 30(7):440-445.
Manning, R.E. 1998. Integration in natural resources education: designing a core curriculum. Society & Natural Resources 22(2):179-190.
Mathis, P.M., Hankins, J.N., Clark, D.C. & Clark, J.D. 1999. Launching a campus-based electronic periodical -- Scientia: The Journal of Student Research. Journal of College Science Teaching 28(6):391-396.
McNeal, A.P. & Murrain, M. 1994. Drugs in the nervous system: a course in learning to learn science. College Teaching 42(2):47-50.
Moore, J.W. 1997. Revitalizing science education. World & I 12(1):214-220.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. 1995. Reshaping the Graduate Education of Scientists and Engineers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. 2000. Enhancing the Postdoctoral Experience for Scientists and Engineers: A Guide for Postdoctoral Scholars, Advisers, Institutions, Funding Organizations, and Disciplinary Societies. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council, Committee on Undergraduate Biology Education to Prepare Research Scientists for the 21st Century. 2003. BIO 2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nerz, H.F. & Weiner, S.T. 2001. Information competencies: a strategic approach. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Annual Conference & Exposition. [Online]. Available: {https://peer.asee.org/information-competencies-a-strategic-approach.pdf} [March 2, 2003].
Orians, C. & Sabol, L. 1999. Using the web to teach library research skills in introductory biology: a collaboration between faculty and librarians. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship Summer 1999. [Online]. Available: http://www.istl.org/99-summer/article2.html [November 5, 2000].
Orr, D., Appleton, M. & Wallin, M. 2001. Information literacy and flexible delivery: creating a conceptual framework and model. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 27(6):457-463.
Plum, S. 1984. Library use and the development of critical thought. In: Increasing the Teaching Role of Academic Libraries (ed., Kirk, T.G.). New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 18. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Pp. 25-33.
Rankin, J.A., ed. 1999. Handbook on problem-based learning. New York: Forbes Custom Pub. (for the Medical Library Association).
Raquepau, C.A. & Richards, L.M. 2002. Investigating the environment: teaching and learning with undergraduates in the sciences. Reference Services Review 30(4):319-323.
Russell, J.M. 2001. Scientific communication at the beginning of the twenty-first century. International Social Science Journal 53(2):271-282.
Schloman, B.F. & Feldmann, R.M. 1993. Developing information gathering skills in geology students through faculty-librarian collaboration. Science & Technology Libraries 14(2):35-47.
Schmidt, D. 1993. 'The Electronic Library': A bibliographic instruction course for graduate students in the life sciences. Science & Technology Libraries 14(2):49-60.
Sheridan, J., ed. 1995. Writing-Across-the-Curriculum and the Academic Library: A Guide for Librarians, Instructors, and Writing Program Directors. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Sinn, R.N. 1998. Library instruction for biology courses: A literature review and survey. Research Strategies 16(2):103-115.
Smith, C.N. 2002. Using the cell signaling literature to teach molecular biology to undergraduates. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 30(6):380-383.
Souchek, R. & Meier, M. 1997. Teaching information literacy and scientific process skills. College Teaching 45(4):128-131.
Stein, L.L. & Lamb, J.M. 1998. Not just another BI: faculty-librarian collaboration to guide students through the research process. Research Strategies 16(1):29-39.
Stokstad, E. 2001. Reintroducing the intro course. Science 293(August 31):1608-1610.
Tennant, M.R. & Miyamoto, M.M. 2002. The role of medical libraries in undergraduate education: a case study in genetics. Journal of the Medical Library Association 90(2):181-193.
Thompson G.B. 2002. Information literacy accreditation mandates: what they mean for faculty and librarians. Library Trends 51(2):218-241.
Von Seggern, M. 1995. Scientists, information seeking, and reference services. The Reference Librarian 49/50:95-105.
Wyckoff, S. 2001. Changing the culture of undergraduate science teaching: shifting from lecture to interactive engagement and scientific reasoning. Journal of College Science Teaching 30(5):306-312.
White, H.B. III. 2002. Classic articles as problem-based learning problems. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 30(5):313-314.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
While ISTL has always been open access and authors have always retained the copyright of their papers without restrictions, articles in issues prior to no.75 were not licensed with Creative Commons licenses. Since issue no. 75 (Winter 2014), ISTL has licensed its work through Creative Commons licenses. Please refer to the Copyright and Licensing Information page for more information.
