A Framework for Evaluating Science and Technology Electronic Reference Books: A Comparison of Five Platforms in Chemistry.

Authors

  • Meghan Lafferty

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2500

Abstract

This article examines what is desirable in online reference books in science and technology and outlines a framework for evaluating their interfaces. The framework considers factors unique to these subject areas like chemical structures and numerical data. Criteria in three categories, navigability, searchability, and results, were applied to five key chemistry e-resources. Some e-book publishers are taking e-books farther and changing expectations for the rest. The framework offers a guide for holding publishers accountable for developing e-reference books that meet users' needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bates, M.J. 2007. What is browsing -- really? A model drawing from behavioural science research. Information Research 12(4):1-17.

Beall, J. 2007. The value of alphabetically-sorted browse displays in information discovery. Library Collections Acquisitions & Technical Services 31(3-4):184-194.

Blankenship, L. & Leffler, J. 2006. Where are the reference books? Colorado Libraries 32(2):10-13.

Bodoff, D. 2006. Relevance for browsing, relevance for searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 57(1):69-86.

Capobianco, A. & Carbonell, N. 2003. Online help for the general public: specific design issues and recommendations. Universal Access in the Information Society 2(3):265-279.

Coker, G. 2007. Usability in emerging e-content environments. Information Services & Use 27(4):179-184.

Cooke, H. & Ridley, D.D. 2004. The challenges with substance databases and structure search engines. Australian Journal of Chemistry 57(5):387-392.

CRC Press. 2009. CHEMLIBnetBASE: Chemistry References Online. [Online]. Available: http://chemlibnetbase.com/ [Accessed May 4, 2009].

Crestani, F., Landoni, M. & Melucci, M. 2006. Appearance and functionality of electronic books. International Journal on Digital Libraries 6:192-209.

Gunter, B. 2005. Electronic books: a survey of users in the UK. Aslib Proceedings 57(6):513-522.

Holmes, M. 2002. Web Usability and Navigation: A Beginner's Guide. Norwood Mass.: Books24x7. [Online]. Available: http://www.books24x7.com/marc.asp?isbn=0072192615 [Accessed May 4, 2009].

Horton, S. 2006. Access by Design: A Guide to Universal Usability for Web Designers. Berkeley, Calif.: New Riders.

John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2008. Wiley InterScience: Home. [Online]. Available: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/home [Accessed May 4, 2009].

Johnson, J. 2003. Web Bloopers: 60 Common Web Design Mistakes and How to Avoid Them. Norwood Mass.: Books24x7. [Online]. Available: http://www.books24x7.com/marc.asp?isbn=1558608400 [Accessed May 4, 2009].

Knovel - Company Overview. 2008. New York: Knovel Corporation. [Online]. Available: {http://why.knovel.com/company/about-knovel.html} [Accessed May 4, 2009].

Landoni, M., Wilson, R. & Gibb, F. 2000. From the Visual book to the WEB book: the importance of design. Electronic Library 18(6):407.

Lazar, J. 2006. Web Usability: A User-centered Design Approach. Boston: Pearson Addison Wesley.

Liu, Z. 2005. Reading behavior in the digital environment: changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation 61(6):700-712.

Maizell, R.E. 1998. How to Find Chemical Information. New York: Wiley. pp. 252-253.

Mander, R. & Smith, B. 2002. Web Usability for Dummies. Norwood Mass.: Books24x7. [Online]. Available: http://www.books24x7.com/marc.asp?bookid=13951 [Accessed May 4, 2009].

Menon, S. & Douma, M. 2008. Factors that improve online experiences. Journal of Interaction Recipes 3(1):3/13/09.

Miller, R. 2005. Ebooks worm their way into the reference market. EContent 28(7/8):30-34.

Nielsen, J. 2008. Top 10 Mistakes in Web Design. [Online]. Available: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9605.html [Accessed May 4, 2009].

Nielsen, J. 2006. F-Shaped Pattern for Reading Web Content. [Online]. Available: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html [Accessed May 4, 2009].

Nielsen, J. 2004. The Need for Web Design Standards. [Online]. Available: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040913.html [Accessed May 4, 2009].

Nielsen, J. 2003. Homepage Real Estate Allocation. [Online]. Available: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030210.html [Accessed May 4, 2009].

Nielsen, J. 2001. Search: Visible and Simple. [Online]. Available: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20010513.html [Accessed May 4, 2009].

Norman, D.A. 2002. The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

Robbins, S., McCain, C. & Scrivener, L. 2006. The changing format of reference collections: are research libraries favoring electronic access over print? Acquisitions Librarian 18(35):75-95.

Sabin-Kildiss, L., Cool, C. & Xie, H. 2001. Assessing the functionality of web-based versions of traditional search engines. Online (Weston, Conn.) 25(2):18-26.

Safley, E. 2006. Demand for e-books in an academic library. Journal of Library Administration 45(3):445-457.

Shiao-Feng Su. 2005. Desirable search features of web-based scholarly e-book systems. Electronic Library 23:64-71.

Spink, A. & Wolfram, D. 2001. Searching the web: the public and their queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 52(3):226.

Sun, Y., Harper, D.J. & Watt, S.N.K. 2004. Design of an E-Book User Interface and Visualizations to Support Reading for Comprehension. In Sanderson, M., Järvelin, K., Allan, J. and Bruza P., editors. Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval; Sheffield UK: ACM. p. 510-511.

Van Epps, A.S. 2005. The evolution of electronic reference sources. Library Hi Tech 23(2):287-298.

Vilar, P. & Žumer, M. 2005. Comparison and evaluation of the user interfaces of e-journals. Journal of Documentation 61(2):203-227.

Webster, P. 2003. Implications of expanded library electronic reference collections. Online (Weston, Conn.) 27(5):24-7, 29-30.

Williams, B. 2007. Evaluating engineering reference eBooks. Against the Grain 19(2):52-56.

Wilson, R., Landoni, M. & Gibb, F. 2002. A user-centred approach to e-book design. Electronic Library 20:322-330.

Downloads

Published

2009-12-01

How to Cite

Lafferty, M. (2009). A Framework for Evaluating Science and Technology Electronic Reference Books: A Comparison of Five Platforms in Chemistry. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (59). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2500

Issue

Section

Refereed Articles
Share |