Shifting Sands: Science Researchers on Google Scholar, Web of Science, and PubMed, with Implications for Library Collections Budgets.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2545Abstract
Science researchers at the University of California Santa Cruz were surveyed about their article database use and preferences in order to inform collection budget choices. Web of Science was the single most used database, selected by 41.6%. Statistically there was no difference between PubMed (21.5%) and Google Scholar (18.7%) as the second most popular database. 83% of those surveyed had used Google Scholar and an additional 13% had not used it but would like to try it. Very few databases account for the most use, and subject-specific databases are used less than big multidisciplinary databases (PubMed is the exception). While Google Scholar is favored for its ease of use and speed, those who prefer Web of Science feel more confident about the quality of their results than do those who prefer Google Scholar. When asked to choose between paying for article database access or paying for journal subscriptions, 66% of researchers chose to keep journal subscriptions, while 34% chose to keep article databases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Downloads
References
CIBER Research Group. 2009. The Economic Downturn and Libraries: Survey Findings. [Internet]. [Cited June 1, 2010]; Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/librarycenter/docDetail.action?docID=80000784
Jascó, P. 2009. Google Scholar's ghost authors. Library Journal 134(18):26-27.
Jascó, P. 2010. Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar. Online Information Review 34(1):175-191.
Schonfeld, R.C., Housewright R. 2010. Faculty Survey 2009: Key Strategic Insights for Libraries, Publishers, and Societies [Internet]. [Cited June 1, 2010]; Ithaka S+R. Available from: {https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/communia2010/sites/communia2010/images/Faculty_Study_2009.pdf}
Tucci V. 2010. Are A&I services in a death spiral? Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship [Internet]. [Cited June 1, 2010]; 61. Available from: http://www.istl.org/10-spring/viewpoint.html
Wagner, A.B. 2009. A&I, full text, and open access: prophecy from the trenches. Learned Publishing 22(1):73-74.
Wagner, A.B. 2010. April 19, 1:45 pm. Voluntary support for arXiv. In: PAMNET [discussion list on the Internet]. [Alexandria (VA): Special Libraries Association, Physics Astronomy and Mathematics Division]; [Cited June 1, 2010]. [about 1p.]. Available from: PAMNET@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Archives available from: http://listserv.nd.edu/archives/pamnet.html
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Christy Hightower, Christy Caldwell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
