Prior Art Research in the Capstone Design Experience: A Case Study of Redesigned Online and In-person Instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2598Abstract
Exploration of "prior art"—the state of a technology’s development, as manifested in literature, documentation, and artifacts—has many benefits for engineering students. It expands their understanding of the design problem, reveals a range of possible solutions, and develops research skills important to professional practice. While prior art often includes patents and research literature, it can include any type of publication or document. This paper presents an innovative approach to a prior art review assignment in the capstone course for mechanical, electrical, and biomedical engineering students at the University of Vermont (UVM). The assignment and accompanying instruction were redesigned in 2018–2019 to address several issues that limited students' ability to do the required work to a high standard. Foundational knowledge about key publication types and research skills was "flipped" into a set of online tutorials; the class session was converted from a lecture to an interactive workshop-style presentation; research consultations with an engineering librarian were tailored to team projects; and the assignment deliverables were redesigned to incorporate more reflection about the process of engaging with prior art. This multifaceted approach involves a substantial amount of preparation. However, assessment showed significant returns on the investment that includes improved knowledge of types of engineering publication, demonstrated use of advanced research practices, and insightful reflections on the role of prior art in design thinking.
Downloads
References
ABET. (2020). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/E001-21-22-EAC-criteria.pdf
ACRL Instruction Section. (2018, March). March 2018 site of the month. https://acrl.ala.org/IS/instruction-tools-resources-2/pedagogy/primo-peer-reviewed-instruction-materials-online/primo-site-of-the-month/march-2018-site-of-the-month/
Allard, S., Levine, K. J., & Tenopir, C. (2009). Design engineers and technical professionals at work: Observing information usage in the workplace. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21004
Bourbon, R. (2006, February 21). Standards as prior art at the European Patent Office. www.etsi.org/images/files/SOSInteroperability/SOSinteropIIIpresentation3-01.pdf
Brown, D. P. (2016, June 26-29). Teaching patents and design novelty to engineering students: A narrative case study based approach. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26041
Clarke, J. (2014). Draw on existing knowledge: Taking advantage of prior art. In M. Fosmire & D. Radcliffe (Eds.), Integrating information into the engineering design process (pp. 125–135). Purdue University Press. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/purduepress_ebooks/31
Denick, D., Bhatt, J., & Layton, B. (2010, June 20-23). Citation analysis of engineering design reports for information literacy assessment. 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--16508
Ekwaro-Osire, S., Afuh, I., & Orono, P. (2008, June 22-25). Information gathering activities in engineering design. 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--4242
European Patent Office. (n.d.-a). Prior art searching. https://www.epo.org/learning/materials/inventors-handbook/novelty/searching.html
European Patent Office. (n.d.-b). What is prior art? https://www.epo.org/learning/materials/inventors-handbook/novelty/prior-art.html
Jeffryes, J., & Lafferty, M. (2012). Gauging workplace readiness: Assessing the information needs of engineering co-op students. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 69. https://doi.org/10.5062/F4X34VDR
Lutz, B., & Paretti, M. C. (2017). Exploring student perceptions of capstone design outcomes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(5), 1521–1533. https://www.ijee.ie/contents/c330517.html
McAdams, J., & Glauberman, J. (2017, June 24-28). Information literacy portfolio for curriculum mapping. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28528
Mercer, K., Weaver, K. D., & Stables-Kennedy, A. J. (2019, June 15-19). Understanding undergraduate engineering student information access and needs: Results from a scoping review. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33485
Moody, N., Fouch, K., Kelley, T., Purzer, S., & Fosmire, M. (2012, March 17). Innovation differentiation: Examining the problem-solving approaches of engineering and technologist students. American Society for Engineering Education IL/IN Sectional Conference, Valparaiso, IN, United States. http://ilin.asee.org/Conference2012/Papers/Fosmire.pdf
Mosberg, S., Adams, R., Kim, R., Atman, C., Turns, J., & Cardella, M. (2005, June 12-15). Conceptions of the engineering design process: An expert study of advanced practicing professionals. 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--14999
Nazemetz, J., Rossler, P., High, M., & High, K. (2007, June 24-27 ). Why reinvent the wheel? The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as a design tool. 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--2284
Osif, B. (2014). Make it safe and legal: Meeting broader community expectations. In M. Fosmire & D. Radcliffe (Eds.), Integrating information into the engineering design process (pp. 115–124). Purdue University Press. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/purduepress_ebooks/31/
Phillips, M., Fosmire, M., & McPherson, P. B. (2018). Standards are everywhere: A freely available introductory online educational program on standardization for product development. Standards Engineering, 70(3), 1–6.
Phillips, M., Fosmire, M., Turner, L., Petersheim, K., & Lu, J. (2019). Comparing the information needs and experiences of undergraduate students and practicing engineers. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.12.004
Phillips, M., Van Epps, A., Johnson, N., & Zwicky, D. (2018). Effective engineering information literacy instruction: A systematic literature review. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(6), 705–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.10.006
Phillips, M., & Zwicky, D. (2017). Patent information use in engineering technology design: An analysis of student work. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 87. https://doi.org/10.5062/f4zs2tr8
Prabha, C., Silipigni Connaway, L., Olszewski, L., & Jenkins, L. R. (2007). What is enough? Satisficing information needs. Journal of Documentation, 63(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410710723894
Sult, L., Mery, Y., Blakiston, R., & Kline, E. (2013). A new approach to online database instruction: Developing the Guide on the Side. Reference Services Review, 41(1), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321311300947
Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2004). Communication patterns of engineers. John Wiley & Sons.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (n.d.). Patent searching and search resources: An introduction. https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Basics-of-Prior-Art-Searching.pdf
Wertz, R., Ross, M. C., Fosmire, M., Cardella, M. E., & Purzer, S. (2011, June 26-29). Do students gather information to inform design decisions? Assessment with an authentic design task in first-year engineering. 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada. https://doi/org/ 10.18260/1-2--17789
Zabihian, F., Strife, M. L., & Armour-Gemmen, M. G. (2015). Integration of information literacy skills to mechanical engineering capstone projects. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24335
Zhang, Q., & Kozak, K. A. (2017, June 24-28). Watch it or read it: Understanding undergraduate engineering students’ learning effectiveness and preference for video tutorials versus Guide-on-the-Side tutorials. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--29111.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Graham Sherriff, Dustin Rand
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
While ISTL has always been open access and authors have always retained the copyright of their papers without restrictions, articles in issues prior to no.75 were not licensed with Creative Commons licenses. Since issue no. 75 (Winter 2014), ISTL has licensed its work through Creative Commons licenses. Please refer to the Copyright and Licensing Information page for more information.
