Prior Art Research in the Capstone Design Experience: A Case Study of Redesigned Online and In-person Instruction


  • Graham Sherriff University of Vermont
  • Dustin Rand University of Vermont



Exploration of "prior art"—the state of a technology’s development, as manifested in literature, documentation, and artifacts—has many benefits for engineering students. It expands their understanding of the design problem, reveals a range of possible solutions, and develops research skills important to professional practice. While prior art often includes patents and research literature, it can include any type of publication or document. This paper presents an innovative approach to a prior art review assignment in the capstone course for mechanical, electrical, and biomedical engineering students at the University of Vermont (UVM). The assignment and accompanying instruction were redesigned in 2018–2019 to address several issues that limited students' ability to do the required work to a high standard. Foundational knowledge about key publication types and research skills was "flipped" into a set of online tutorials; the class session was converted from a lecture to an interactive workshop-style presentation; research consultations with an engineering librarian were tailored to team projects; and the assignment deliverables were redesigned to incorporate more reflection about the process of engaging with prior art. This multifaceted approach involves a substantial amount of preparation. However, assessment showed significant returns on the investment that includes improved knowledge of types of engineering publication, demonstrated use of advanced research practices, and insightful reflections on the role of prior art in design thinking.


Download data is not yet available.


ABET. (2020). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs.

ACRL Instruction Section. (2018, March). March 2018 site of the month.

Allard, S., Levine, K. J., & Tenopir, C. (2009). Design engineers and technical professionals at work: Observing information usage in the workplace. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 443–454.

Bourbon, R. (2006, February 21). Standards as prior art at the European Patent Office.

Brown, D. P. (2016, June 26-29). Teaching patents and design novelty to engineering students: A narrative case study based approach. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, United States.

Clarke, J. (2014). Draw on existing knowledge: Taking advantage of prior art. In M. Fosmire & D. Radcliffe (Eds.), Integrating information into the engineering design process (pp. 125–135). Purdue University Press.

Denick, D., Bhatt, J., & Layton, B. (2010, June 20-23). Citation analysis of engineering design reports for information literacy assessment. 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, United States.

Ekwaro-Osire, S., Afuh, I., & Orono, P. (2008, June 22-25). Information gathering activities in engineering design. 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

European Patent Office. (n.d.-a). Prior art searching.

European Patent Office. (n.d.-b). What is prior art?

Jeffryes, J., & Lafferty, M. (2012). Gauging workplace readiness: Assessing the information needs of engineering co-op students. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 69.

Lutz, B., & Paretti, M. C. (2017). Exploring student perceptions of capstone design outcomes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(5), 1521–1533.

McAdams, J., & Glauberman, J. (2017, June 24-28). Information literacy portfolio for curriculum mapping. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, United States.

Mercer, K., Weaver, K. D., & Stables-Kennedy, A. J. (2019, June 15-19). Understanding undergraduate engineering student information access and needs: Results from a scoping review. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, United States.

Moody, N., Fouch, K., Kelley, T., Purzer, S., & Fosmire, M. (2012, March 17). Innovation differentiation: Examining the problem-solving approaches of engineering and technologist students. American Society for Engineering Education IL/IN Sectional Conference, Valparaiso, IN, United States.

Mosberg, S., Adams, R., Kim, R., Atman, C., Turns, J., & Cardella, M. (2005, June 12-15). Conceptions of the engineering design process: An expert study of advanced practicing professionals. 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, United States.

Nazemetz, J., Rossler, P., High, M., & High, K. (2007, June 24-27 ). Why reinvent the wheel? The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as a design tool. 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, United States.

Osif, B. (2014). Make it safe and legal: Meeting broader community expectations. In M. Fosmire & D. Radcliffe (Eds.), Integrating information into the engineering design process (pp. 115–124). Purdue University Press.

Phillips, M., Fosmire, M., & McPherson, P. B. (2018). Standards are everywhere: A freely available introductory online educational program on standardization for product development. Standards Engineering, 70(3), 1–6.

Phillips, M., Fosmire, M., Turner, L., Petersheim, K., & Lu, J. (2019). Comparing the information needs and experiences of undergraduate students and practicing engineers. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(1), 39–49.

Phillips, M., Van Epps, A., Johnson, N., & Zwicky, D. (2018). Effective engineering information literacy instruction: A systematic literature review. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(6), 705–711.

Phillips, M., & Zwicky, D. (2017). Patent information use in engineering technology design: An analysis of student work. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 87.

Prabha, C., Silipigni Connaway, L., Olszewski, L., & Jenkins, L. R. (2007). What is enough? Satisficing information needs. Journal of Documentation, 63(1), 74–89.

Sult, L., Mery, Y., Blakiston, R., & Kline, E. (2013). A new approach to online database instruction: Developing the Guide on the Side. Reference Services Review, 41(1), 125–133.

Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2004). Communication patterns of engineers. John Wiley & Sons.

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (n.d.). Patent searching and search resources: An introduction.

Wertz, R., Ross, M. C., Fosmire, M., Cardella, M. E., & Purzer, S. (2011, June 26-29). Do students gather information to inform design decisions? Assessment with an authentic design task in first-year engineering. 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada. https://doi/org/ 10.18260/1-2--17789

Zabihian, F., Strife, M. L., & Armour-Gemmen, M. G. (2015). Integration of information literacy skills to mechanical engineering capstone projects. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, United States.

Zhang, Q., & Kozak, K. A. (2017, June 24-28). Watch it or read it: Understanding undergraduate engineering students’ learning effectiveness and preference for video tutorials versus Guide-on-the-Side tutorials. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, United States.




How to Cite

Sherriff, G., & Rand, D. (2022). Prior Art Research in the Capstone Design Experience: A Case Study of Redesigned Online and In-person Instruction. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (100).



Refereed Articles
Share |