Understanding Research Data Practices of Civil and Environmental Engineering Graduate Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2678Abstract
Research data management is essential for high-quality reproducible research, yet relatively little is known about how research data management is practiced by graduate students in Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE). Prior research suggests that faculty in CEE delegate research data management to graduate students, prompting this investigation into how graduate students practice data management. This study uses semi-structured interviews and qualitative content analysis to explore how CEE graduate students work with data and practice data management in their research, as well as what resources and support would meet their needs. Many respondents touched on data collection, data management, disseminating research outputs, and collaboration and learning in their interviews. Several themes emerged from the interviews: data quality as a concern, as many CEE graduate students rely on secondary data for research; a gap between values and enacted practices; a connection between disseminating data and reproducibility; and a reliance on peer and self-directed learning for data management education. Based on these themes, the study recommends strategies for librarians and others on campus to better support CEE graduate student research data practices.
Downloads
References
Antell, K., Foote, J. B., Turner, J., & Shults, B. (2014). Dealing with data: Science librarians’ participation in data management at Association of Research Libraries institutions. College & Research Libraries, 75(4), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.75.4.557
Beaver, D. Deb. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014254214337
Cai, L., & Zhu, Y. (2015). The challenges of data quality and data quality assessment in the big data era. Data Science Journal, 14, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2015-002
Carlson, J., Fosmire, M., Miller, C. C., & Nelson, M. S. (2011). Determining data information literacy needs: A study of students and research faculty. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(2), 629–657. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0022
Carlson, J., & Stowell-Bracke, M. (2013). Data management and sharing from the perspective of graduate students: An examination of the culture and practice at the water quality field station. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(4), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2013.0034
Carnegie Mellon University. (2020). Enrollment Fall 2021. Institutional Research and Analysis. http://www.cmu.edu/ira/Enrollment/index.html
Chen, X., Benner, J., Young, S., & Marsteller, M. R. (2019, June 15-19). Understanding the research practices and service needs of civil and environmental engineering researchers – A grounded theory approach [Paper presentation]. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33483
Cho, J. Y., & Lee, E.-H. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report, 19(32), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1028
Choudhury, S. (2008). Case study in data curation at Johns Hopkins University. Library Trends, 57(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.0.0028
Cooper, D., Springer, R., Benner, J., Bloom, D., Carrillo, E., Carroll, A., Chang, B., Chen, X., Daix, E., Dommermuth, E., Figueriredo, R., Haas, J., Hafner, C., Henshilwood, A., Krogman, A., Kuglitsch, R., Lanteri, S., Lewis, A., Li, L., ... Yu, S. H. (2019). Supporting the changing research practices of civil and environmental engineering scholars. Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.310885
Cox, A. M., Kennan, M. A., Lyon, L., & Pinfield, S. (2017). Developments in research data management in academic libraries: Towards an understanding of research data service maturity. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2182–2200. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23781
Cox, A. M., & Pinfield, S. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(4), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000613492542
FORCE11. (2014). The FAIR data principles. FORCE11: The Future of Research Communications and e-Scholarship. https://force11.org/info/the-fair-data-principles/
Gardner, S. K. (2007). “I heard it through the grapevine”: Doctoral student socialization in chemistry and history. Higher Education, 54(5), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9020-x
Ivey, S. S., Best, R. M., Camp, C. V., & Palazolo, P. J. (2012, June 10-13). Transforming a civil engineering curriculum through GIS integration [Paper presentation]. 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX. United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22130
Jahnke, L., Asher, A. D., Keralis, S. D. C., & Henry, C. (2012). The problem of data. Council on Library and Information Resources and Digital Library Federation. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub154
Johnston, L., & Jeffryes, J. (2014). Data management skills needed by structural engineering students: Case study at the University of Minnesota. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 140(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000154
Kim, J. (2013). Data sharing and its implications for academic libraries. New Library World, 114(11/12), 494–506. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-06-2013-0051
Kuglitsch, R., Dommermuth, E., & Lewis, A. (2018). Research practices of civil and environmental engineering scholars. University Libraries University of Colorado Boulder. https://scholar.colorado.edu/libr_facpapers/132
Lage, K., Losoff, B., & Maness, J. (2011). Receptivity to library involvement in scientific data curation: A case study at the University of Colorado Boulder. portal: Libraries and the Academy 11(4), 915-937. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0049
Latham, B. (2017). Research data management: Defining roles, prioritizing services, and enumerating challenges. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(3), 263–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.04.004
Montgomery, J. L., Harmon, T., Kaiser, W., Sanderson, A., Hass, C. N., Hooper, R., Minsker, B., Schnoor, J., Clesceri, N., Graham, W., & Brezonik, P. (2007). The WATERS Network: An integrated environmental observatory network for water research. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(19), 6642–6647. https://doi.org/10.1021/es072618f
Newton, M. P., Miller, C. C., & Bracke, M. S. (2010). Librarian roles in institutional repository data set collecting: Outcomes of a research library task force. Collection Management, 36(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10/d65c3b
Pasek, J. E., & Mayer, J. (2019). Education needs in research data management for science-based disciplines: Self-assessment surveys of graduate students and faculty at two public universities. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 92. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl12
Pejşa, S., & Song, C. (2013, July 22-26). Publishing earthquake engineering research data [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Indianapolis, IN, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/2467696.2467758
Petters, J. L., Brooks, G. C., Smith, J. A., & Haas, C. A. (2019). The Impact of targeted data management training for field research projects – A case study. Data Science Journal, 18(43), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-043
Pinfield, S., Cox, A. M., & Smith, J. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Relationships, activities, drivers and influences. PLoS One, 9(12), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114734
Radecki, J., & Springer, R. (2020). Research data services in US higher education: A web-based inventory. Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.314397
Rolando, L., Carlson, J., Hswe, P., Parham, S. W., Westra, B., & Whitmire, A. L. (2015). Data management plans as a research tool. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 41(5), 43–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2015.1720410510
Sadiq, S., & Indulska, M. (2017). Open data: Quality over quantity. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.003
Sapp Nelson, M. (2015). Data strategies: The research says. Purdue University. https://10.5703/1288284315525
Satheesan, S. P., Alameda, J., Bradley, S., Dietze, M., Galewsky, B., Jansen, G., Kooper, R., Kumar, P., Lee, J., Marciano, R., Marini, L., Minsker, B. S., Navarro, C. M., Schmidt, A., Slavenas, M., Sullivan, W. C., Zhang, B., Zhao, Y., Zharnitsky, I., & McHenry, K. (2018, July 22-26). Brown Dog: Making the digital world a better place, a few files at a time [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Practice and Experience on Advanced Research Computing, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/3219104.3219132
Schröder, W., & Nickel, S. (2020). Research data management as an integral part of the research process of empirical disciplines using landscape ecology as an example. Data Science Journal, 19(26), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-026
Shahi, A., Haas, C. T., West, J. S., & Akinci, B. (2014). Workflow-based construction research data management and dissemination. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 28(2), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000251
Sharma, S., & Qin, J. (2014). Data management: Graduate student’s awareness of practices and policies. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2014.14505101130
Tang, R., & Hu, Z. (2019). Providing research data management (RDM) services in libraries: Preparedness, roles, challenges, and training for RDM practice. Data and Information Management, 3(2), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2019-0009
Trisovic, A., Mika, K., Boyd, C., Feger, S., & Crosas, M. (2021). Repository approaches to improving the quality of shared data and code. Data, 6(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/data6020015
UNESCO. (2020). Open science: Making science more accessible, inclusive and equitable for the benefit of all. https://en.unesco.org/science-sustainable-future/open-science
University of Colorado Boulder. (2020). University of Colorado Boulder IR. Tableau Public. https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/university.of.colorado.boulder.ir
U.S. News & World Report. (2021). Best engineering schools ranked in 2021. https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-engineering-schools/eng-rankings
Valentino, M., & Boock, M. (2015). Data management for graduate students: A case study at Oregon State University. Practical Academic Librarianship, 5(2), 77–91.
Wiley, C. A., & Kerby, E. E. (2018). Managing research data: Graduate student and postdoctoral researcher perspectives. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 89. https://doi.org/10.5062/F4FN14FJ
Witt, M. (2012). Co-designing, co-developing, and co-implementing an institutional data repository service. Journal of Library Administration, 52(2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2012.655607
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Xiaoju Chen, Emily Dommermuth, Jessica G. Benner, Rebecca Kuglitsch, Abbey B. Lewis, Matthew R. Marsteller, Katherine Mika, Sarah Young
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
