Mind the Gap: Understanding Coverage Breaks of Newly Launched Engineering and Computer Science Journals in Core Databases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2764Keywords:
IEEE, ACM, Scopus, Google Scholar, Coverage, engineering, computer science, Web of Science, indexingAbstract
Journal coverage is an important factor to consider when evaluating a database. In this study, we counted the number of articles (including early access articles) in newly-launched journals (2018-2022) from two major association publishers in engineering and computer science: the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). We then compared these numbers with the number of articles from these journals in Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection, Scopus, and Google Scholar (GS). Results indicated that GS had higher percentages for coverage for all the journals that were assessed and outperformed WOS and Scopus in terms of how fast newly-launched journals were indexed. Findings from this study will help librarians evaluate each database in reference, instruction, and collection development.
Downloads
References
Alotaibi, F., & Johnson, F. (2020). Why we like Google Scholar: Postgraduate students' perceptions of factors influencing their intention to use. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(4), 587-603. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-10-2019-0304
Bosman, J., van Mourik, I., Rasch, M., Sieverts, E., & Verhoeff, H. (2006). Scopus reviewed and compared: The coverage and functionality of the citation database Scopus, including comparisons with Web of Science and Google Scholar. https://www.ltu.se/cms_fs/1.25811!/scopus_reviewed.pdf
Brown, C. C. (2017). Harnessing the Power of Google: What Every Researcher Should Know. Libraries Unlimited.
Brown, C. C. (2021). Librarian’s Guide to Online Searching: Cultivating Database Instruction (6th edition). Libraries Unlimited
Clarivate Analytics. (2023a, April 14). Resources for librarians: Web of science coverage details.
https://clarivate.libguides.com/librarianresources/coverage
Clarivate Analytics. (2023b, June 1). Web of Science Journal Evaluation Process and Selection Criteria.
Cole, C., Davis, A. R., Eyer, V., & Meier, J. J. (2018). Google Scholar's coverage of the engineering literature 10 years later. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(3), 419-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.02.013
Elsevier. (2023a, April 14). Scopus LibGuide: Content. https://elsevier.libguides.com/Scopus/content
Elsevier. (2023b, June 1). Content Policy and Selection.
https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/how-scopus-works/content/content-policy-and-selection
Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google Scholar to overshadow them all?: Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118(1), 177-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5
Halevi, G., Moed, H., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2017). Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation - Review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 823-834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.06.005
Harzing, A. W. (2013). A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: A longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1057-1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0777-7
Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106, 787-804.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
Klassen, T. W. (2020). Science A&I database holdings at ARL and Oberlin Group libraries, 2011-2016: A longitudinal study. College & Research Libraries, 81(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.2.215
Luftig, D., & Plungis, J. (2020). OhioLINK librarians and Google Scholar over time: A longitudinal analysis of attitudes and uses. Reference Services Review, 48(4), 683-698. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-04-2020-0031
Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2021). Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: A multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126(1), 871-906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
Oh, K. E., & Colón-Aguirre, M. (2019). A comparative study of perceptions and use of Google Scholar and academic library discovery systems. College & Research Libraries, 80(6), 876-891. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.6.876
Orduna-Malea, E., Ayllón, J., Martín-Martín, A., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2015). Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 104(3), 931-949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1614-6
Thompson, L. (2020, July 30). Indexing of recently started journals [Online forum post]. http://mailman12.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/ELDnet-l
Vinyard, M. W., & Colvin, J. B. (2022). Demystifying Scholarly Metrics: A Practical Guide. Libraries Unlimited.
Zhang, L. (2015). Use of library services by engineering faculty at Mississippi State University, a large Land Grant institution. Science & Technology Libraries, 34(3), 272-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2015.1090941
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yuening Zhang, Dylan Yu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
