Acknowledging Librarians’ Contributions to Systematic Review Searching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5596/c16-014Keywords:
systematic reviews, health sciences librarianship, collaboration, authorship, acknowledgementAbstract
Abstract
Introduction
Academic health librarians are increasingly involved as members of research teams that conduct systematic reviews. Sometimes librarians are co-authors on the resulting publications, sometimes they are acknowledged, and sometimes they receive no recognition. This study was designed to query librarian supervisors’ understanding of the extent to which Canadian academic health librarians are involved in systematic reviews and the manner in which their work is recognized.
Methods
A survey asking 21 questions was sent to supervisors of librarians at all 17 academic health sciences libraries in Canada, querying the extent and nature of librarians’ involvement in systematic review research projects and the forms of acknowledgement that they receive.
Results
Fourteen responses to the survey were received. Results show strong expectations that librarians are involved, and will be involved, in systematic review research projects. Results related to the number of reviews undertaken, the amount of time required, the forms of acknowledgement received, and the professional value of systematic review searching varied greatly.
Discussion
The lack of consensus among academic health librarians’ supervisors regarding most aspects of librarians’ involvement in systematic review projects, and the ways in which this work is and should be acknowledged, points to the need for research on this subject.
References
1. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet].; 2015 [updated April 17, 2015; cited November 23, 2015]. Available from: http://community.cochrane.org/handbook.
2. Standards for systematic reviews. [Internet].: IOM (Institute of Medicine); 2015 [updated August 19, 2015; cited November 25, 2015]. Available from: https://iom.nationalacademies.org/Reports/2011/Finding-What-Works-in-Health-Care-Standards-for-Systematic-Reviews/Standards.aspx.
3. A Guide to Knowledge Synthesis [Internet].; 2010 [updated 2010-04-08; cited November 29, 2015]. Available from: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/41382.html.
4. McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Jan;93(1):74-80.
5. Crum JA, Cooper ID. Emerging roles for biomedical librarians: a survey of current practice, challenges, and changes. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Oct;101(4):278-86.
6. Dudden RF, Protzko SL. The systematic review team: contributions of the health sciences librarian. Med Ref Serv Q. 2011;30(3):301-15.
7. Murphy SA, Boden C. Benchmarking participation of Canadian university health sciences librarians in systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA. 2014 accepted;103(2):73-8.
8. Harris MR. The librarian's roles in the systematic review process: a case study. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Jan;93(1):81-7.
9. Gann L,B., Pratt G,F. Using library search service metrics to demonstrate library value and manage workload. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA [doi:10.3163/1536-5050.101.3.015.]. 2013;101(3):227-9.
10. Saleh AA, Ratajeski MA, Bertolet M. Grey literature searching for health sciences systematic reviews: A prospective study of time spent and resources utilized. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 2014;9(3):28-50.
11. Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 6;68(6):617-26.
12. Haines T, McKnight L, Duku E, Perry L, Thoma A. The role of systematic reviews in clinical research and practice. Clin Plast Surg. 2008 Apr;35(2):207-14.
13. Davies M, Gordon S, Hutchinson R. Systematic Reviews and the Evolving Role of Liasons. A Universe of Possibilities, 20th Annual Super Conference of the Ontario Library Association; ; Toronto, ON, Canada. 29 Jan–1 Feb 2014; Presented at.; http://dysartjones.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/ID-75-Systematic-Reviews-and-Librarians.jpg. ; 2014.
14. Gore GC, Jones J. Systematic Reviews and LIbrarians: A Primer for Managers. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research. 2015;10(1):1.
15. Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors [Internet].: ICJME (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors); 2015 [cited November 23, 2015]. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html#two.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
