To What Extent is a Return to a Gold Standard a Desirable and Feasible Option for the United States of America?

Authors

  • Nicholas Asquin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/psur36

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to evaluate both the feasibility and desirability for the United States to return to a form of gold-backed currency, such as a gold standard. It was first necessary to provide a definition of a gold standard, as well as explain how one functions, before exploring some of the contemporary arguments as to why a return to a system such as this would be a good policy decision. The typical benefits that proponents of a gold standard cite are increased price stability, decreased inflation, and a decrease in the federal deficit through reduced spending. This investigation yielded the findings that not only do these benefits typically fail to materialize under a gold standard, but such a system can actually be detrimental to price stability in the consumer price index. Among other reasons explored that calls a gold standard’s feasibility into question, the consensus of eminent economists and journalists points to a political climate inhospitable to a return to a gold-backed currency. It is for these reasons that I conclude a return to a form of gold standard to be neither desirable nor feasible for the United States.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-15

How to Cite

Asquin, N. (2017). To What Extent is a Return to a Gold Standard a Desirable and Feasible Option for the United States of America?. Political Science Undergraduate Review, 2(2), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.29173/psur36