Nozick, Entitlement Theory and the Justification for Maximizing Individual Freedoms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/psur4Abstract
The purpose of this paper was, in explaining Robert Nozick’s ‘Entitlement theory’, to argue whether his ideas of ‘just acquisition’ and ‘self-ownership’ provided sufficient justification for maximizing individual freedom. In this paper I examined the key principles of Entitlement theory Nozick uses, in conjuncture to his concepts of ‘self-ownership and ‘just acquisition’, to justify his conception of freedom. I performed this by exploring the implications of these principles and the extent to which they are logically coherent with the rest of his theory after first laying out the definitions of the terms Nozick uses as a foundation. Although I found that Nozick provides a couple of compelling cases that support his theory, Entitlement theory in general falls short of complete justification for maximized personal freedoms due to unaddressed problems with his concepts of ‘self-ownership’ and ‘just acquisition’. Namely, that the extent which to these concepts apply eventually create situations in which the natural execution of Nozick’s acquisition and transfer rights can impede on the rights of others, undermining his theory.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication to this journal.