Gender and Academic Promotion to Full Professor in Ontario
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs29365Keywords:
Sociology, Gender, Academic Promotion, SalaryAbstract
This is a study of 933 academic promotions from associate to full professor in Ontario, Canada for the period 2010-2014. Publicly available sources provided a bibliometric profile including gender, year of promotion, university, academic discipline, salary, type and number of publications and number of authors for each promotion to full professor. We found a large gender gap in academic promotions favouring men, which is explained mainly by a structural focus on male-dominated academic disciplines. We also found large differences in numbers of publications by academic discipline, which was substantially reduced after considering the number of authors per publication. Business professors were paid substantially more than other professors at the time of promotion. Our study focused on publications, and given this limitation the results should be taken in the context that there are multiple considerations for promotion. Publication quality and impact, grants and patents, were not adjusted for.
References
Barbezat, D. A., & Hughes, J. W. (2005). Salary structure effects and the gender pay gap in academia. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 621-640.
Barrios, M., Villarroya, A., & Borrego, Á. (2013). Scientific production in psychology: a gender analysis. Scientometrics, 95(1), 15-23.
Benjamin, E. (1999). Disparities in the salaries and appointments of academic women and men. Academe, 60-62.
Blackaby, D., Booth, A. L., & Frank, J. (2005). Outside Offers and the Gender Pay Gap: Empirical Evidence from the UK Academic Labour Market. The Economic Journal, 115(501), F81-F107.
Brown, L. K., Troutt, E., & Prentice, S. (2011). Ten Years After: Sex and Salaries at a Canadian University. Canadian Public Policy, 37(2), 239-255.
CAUT. (2011). Understanding male-female salary differentials amongst Canadian academic staff. CAUT Equity Review, 1(5), 1-8.
Hunter, L., & Leahey, E. (2010). Parenting and research productivity: New evidence and methods. Social Studies of Science.
Larivière, V., Vignola-Gagné, E., Villeneuve, C., Gélinas, P., & Gingras, Y. (2011). Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors. Scientometrics, 87(3), 483-498.
Long, J. S. (1992). Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71(1), 159-178.
McMaster University Office of Institutional Research and Analysis. (2014). Summary of an Analysis of Gender Pay Equity of Full-Time Faculty Members. Retrieved from http://www.mcmaster.ca/vpacademic/documents/Gender_Pay_Equity_Analysis_Final_Summary_Mar_31_2014.pdf
Nakhaie, M. R. (2002). Gender Differences in Publication among University Professors in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 39(2), 151-179.
Ornstein, M., & Stewart, P. (1996). Gender and faculty pay in Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 461-481.
Sen, A., Ariizumi, H., & Desousa, N. (2014). Evaluative the Relationship between Pay and Research Productivity: Panel Data Evidence from Ontario Universities. Canadian Public Policy, 40(1), 1-14.
Statistics Canada. (2009). Salaries and Salary Scales of Full-time Teaching Staff at Canadian Universities, 2008/2009: Preliminary Report. Retrieved from Ottawa:
Statistics Canada. (2012). Salaries and Salary Scales of Full-time Teaching Staff at Canadian Universities, 2010/2011: Final Report. Retrieved from Ottawa:
Statistics Canada. (2017). Table 477-0017 Number of full-time teaching staff at Canadian universities, by rank, sex, Canada and Provinces, *Archived*. Retrieved from http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&retrLang=eng&id=4770017&tabMode=dataTable&srchLan=-1&p1=-1&p2=9
Warman, C., Woolley, F., & Worswick, C. (2010). The evolution of male‐female earnings differentials in Canadian universities, 1970–2001. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 43(1), 347-372.
Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 847-870.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Canadian Journal of Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. The CJS will perform the usual functions of copy-editing on the article. The Author(s) will be given an opportunity to read and correct proofs, but if they fail to return them by the date set on the proofs, production and publication may proceed without the Author(s)'s approval of proofs.
2. The CJS will publish this article pursuant to this contract at its cost. CJS has the exclusive right to determine how the article will appear in the journal and elsewhere.
3. The Author(s) warrant that permission to publish the article has not been previously assigned elsewhere. The Author(s) further warrant that the contribution is original to them, except for any copyrighted material of others incorporated in it, and that the Author(s) will advise us of any material, either text or illustration, the rights for which are controlled by others. Where necessary, the Author(s) will obtain, before publication and at their expense, permission in writing from the owner of the copyright in that material for publication by us. Copies of any such permission must be submitted to CJS for our files.
4. The Author(s) further warrant that the article contains no defamatory or otherwise unlawful matter and that it makes no improper invasion of the privacy or personal rights of anyone. The Author(s) undertake that all statements in it purporting to be facts are true; and that they will advise us of any statements that might be construed as defamatory or otherwise unlawful. We may require substantive revision of the manuscript to avoid including material that may infringe rights or be defamatory or otherwise unlawful. 5. In the unlikely event of any claim, action, or proceeding based on an alleged violation of any of these warranties, we shall have the right to defend the same through counsel of our own choosing. The Author(s) agree to pay all resulting costs and damages, except that this indemnity shall not apply to any changes in the manuscript by us that were not approved by the Author(s) in advance of publication, or to any material that the Authors had warned us in advance of publication might be construed as defamatory or otherwise unlawful.
6. In order to protect both Author(s) and CJS from unauthorized use of the article, the Author(s) agree to refer to us any subsequent requests to publish it or a substantial portion thereof. If we choose to grant any such request, we will normally exact a standard fee for reprinting, the amount of this fee to be fixed by us from time to time; this fee will be divided equally with Author(s). We will accede to any request by the Author(s) to use part or all of their article in a article published under either Author(s)’s exclusive authorship or editorship, provided that acknowledgment of its first appearance is made in a manner approved by CJS, and in such cases no fee for reprinting shall be payable to us.
7. Subject to the above conditions, and in consideration of CJS undertaking to subsidize costs of publication of the article, the Author(s) assign to CJS the exclusive world rights to the article in its present, or substantially its present, form, and the parties hereto agree upon the foregoing terms for themselves and their respective executors, administrators, assigns, or successors. The Author(s) herby waive any claim for royalties and reprint fees arising from the use of their article. CJS hereby obtains the right to use the article in any future publication, including, but not limited to, publication in electronic media, issued under its auspices and to authorize others, including reproduction rights organizations such as CanCopy, to do the same.
Canadian Journal of Sociology | ISSN 1710-1123