A Path-Dependent Approach to Communal Transformation
Reconciling Cognitive and Structural Views of Collective Community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs29704Keywords:
Ethnicity, Ethnic Transformation, Path Dependencey, raceAbstract
Cognitive views claim that ethnic, national, and racial communities are malleable and constantly transforming, while more structural accounts consider these collective communities highly static. This article considers communal transformations at the population level, combines aspects of cognitive and structural perspectives, and uses path dependence to explain why collective communities are transformative in some instances but much more rigid in others. It claims that communal boundaries are usually relatively static because communal structures reinforce them through three main mechanism of reproduction, all of which can reproduce communal frameworks through inclusion and exclusion: cost, power, and socialization. In turn, the article describes how two types of critical juncture create openings for more punctuated and extensive communal transformations. Constructive critical junctures occur prior to the existence of powerful mechanisms of communal reproduction and make possible the construction of new communal frameworks. Alternatively, transformative critical junctures are openings for change that result from the weakening or breakdown of extant mechanisms of reproduction and generally promote transformations in preexisting communal frameworks. To clarify and support the argument, the article provides a variety of examples and an analysis of transformations in the Quebecois collective community.
References
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Banton, Michael. 1997. Ethnic and Racial Consciousness. New York: Longman Publishers.
Barth, Fredrik. 1969. “Introduction.” In Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference, edited by Fredrik Barth, 9-38. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Behiels, Michael. 1985. Prelude to Quebec’s Quiet Revolution: Liberalism versus Neo-Nationalism, 1945-1960. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Billig, Michael. 1995. Banal Nationalism. London: Sage Publications.
Brass, Paul. 1997. Theft of an Idol. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Brewer, Marilyne. 1999. “The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love or Outgroup Hate?” Journal of Social Issues 55: 429-444.
Brown, Donald. 1991. Human Universals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Brubaker, Rogers. 2004. Ethnicity Without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chandra, Kanchan ed. 2012. Constructivist Theories of Ethnic Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, Steven and Arnold Eisen. 2000. The Jew Within: Self, Family, and Community in America. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.
Coleman, William. 1984. The Independence Movement in Quebec, 1945-1980. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
Collier, Ruth Berins and David Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cook, Ramsay. 1967. “French Canadian Interpretations of Canadian History.” Journal of Canadian Studies, 2: 3-17.
Cornell, Stephen and Douglas Hartman. 1998. Ethnicity and Race: Making Identities in a Changing World. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75: 332-337.
Darden, Keith. Forthcoming. Resisting Occupation in Eurasia: Mass Schooling and the Creation of Durable National Loyalties. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Douglass, Frederick. 1881. “The Color Line.” North American Review 132: 567-577.
Fearon, James D. and David D. Laitin. 2000. “Violence and the Social Construction of Ethnic Identity.” International Organization, 54 (4): 845–877.
Gagnon, V.P. 2004. The Myth of Ethnic War: Serbia and Croatia in the 1990s. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Galaty, John. 1982. “Being ‘Maasai’; Being ‘People of Cattle’: Ethnic Shifters in East Africa.” American Ethnologist 9: 1–20.
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gilley, Bruce. 2004. “Against the Concept of Ethnic Conflict.” Third World Quarterly 25: 1155-1166.
Goldsheider, Calvin. 1986. Jewish Continuity and Change: Emerging Patterns in America. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Greene, Joshua. 2013. Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them. New York: Penguin Books.
Greenfeld, Liah. 1992. Nationalism: Five Roads to Modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hale, Henry. 2004. “Explaining Ethnicity.” Comparative Political Studies 37: 458-485.
Himmelfarb, Harold. 1980. “The Study of American Jewish Identification: How It Is Defined, Measured, Obtained, Sustained and Lost.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 19 (1): 48-60.
Hodgetts, A.B. 1968. What Culture, What Heritage? A Study of Civic Education in Canada. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Jenkins, Richard. 2008. Rethinking Ethnicity: Arguments and Explorations. London: Sage Publications.
Kalmijn, Matthijs, Aart C. Liefbroer, Frans van Poppel, and Hanna van Solinge. 2006. “The Family Factor in Jewish-Gentile Intermarriage: A Sibling Analysis of the Netherlands.” Social Forces, 84 (3): 1347-1358.
Lamont, Michèle and Virág Molnár. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 167-195.
Lange, Matthew. 2017. Killing Others: A Natural History of Ethnic Violence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Lebrun, Johanne, Yves Lenoir, Mario Laforest, Francois Larose, Gerard-Raymond Roy, Carlo Spallanzani, and Mary Pearson. 2002. “Past and Current Trends in the Analysis of Textbooks in a Quebec Context.” Curriculum Inquiry, 32 (1): 51-83.
Loveman, Mara. 1999. “Is ‘Race’ Essential?” American Sociological Review, 64 (6): 891-898.
Mahoney, James. 2000. “Path Dependence and Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29: 507-548.
Mahoney, James. 2001. The Legacies of Liberalism: Path Dependence and Political Regimes in Central America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mahoney, James, and Kathleen Thelen eds. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Malešević, Siniša. 2013. Nation-States and Nationalism. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Maryanki, Alexandra, and Jonathan Turner. 1992. The Social Cage: Human Nature and the Evolution of Society. Stanford: Sanford University Press.
Moerman, Michael. 1965. “Ethnic Identification in a Complex Civilization: Who are the Lue?” American Anthropologist 67: 1215-1230.
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review, 94 (2): 251-267.
Posner, Daniel. 2005. Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. 2005. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ruane, Joseph and Jennifer Todd. 2004. “The Roots of Intense Ethnic Conflict May Not in Fact be Ethnic: Categories, Communities and Path Dependence.” European Journal of Sociology, 45 (2): 209-232.
Sklare, Marshall and Joseph Greenblum. 1967. Jewish Identity on the Suburban Frontier: A Study of Survival on the Open Frontier. New York: Basic Books.
Slater, Dan and Erica Simmons. 2010. “Informative Regress: Critical Antecedents in Comparative Politics.” Comparative Political Studies, 43 (7): 886-917.
Tajfel, Henri. 1970. “Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination.” Scientific American 223: 96-102.
Tajfel, Henri. 1974. “Social Identity and Intergroup Behavior.” Social Science Information 13: 65-93.
Tajfel, Henri ed. 1978. Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.
Trudel, Marcel and Genevieve Jain. 1970. Canadian History Textbooks: A Comparative Study. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer.
Turner, John C., Penelope J. Oakes, S. Alexander Haslam, and Craig McGarty. 1994. “Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20: 454-463.
Verdery, Katherine. 1994. “Ethnicity, Nationalism, and State-Making: Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: Past and Present.” In The Anthropology of Ethnicity: Beyond ‘Ethnic Groups and Boundaries.’ Eds. Hans Vermeulen and Cora Govers. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis, 33-58
Waite, Linda and Judith Steps Friedman. 1997. “The Impact of Religious Upbringing and Marriage Markets on Jewish Intermarriage.” Contemporary Jewry, 18:1-23.
Waters, Mary. 1990. Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Weber, Eugen. 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870-1914. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Weinfeld, Morton. 2001. Like Everyone Else, But Different: The Paradoxical Success of Canadian Jews. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
Wimmer, Andreas. 2002. Nationalist Exclusion and Ethnic Conflict: Shadows of Modernity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wimmer, Andreas. 2008. “The Making and Unmaking of Ethnic Boundaries: A Multilevel Process Theory.” American Journal of Sociology, 113 (4): 970-1022.
Wimmer, Andreas. 2013. Ethnic Boundary Making: Institutions, Power, Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
Woodward, Susan. 1995. Balkan Tragedy: Chaos and Dissolution after the Cold War. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Zubrzycki, Genevieve. 2016. Beheading the Saint: Nationalism, Religion, and Secularism in Quebec. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Matthew Lange
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. The CJS will perform the usual functions of copy-editing on the article. The Author(s) will be given an opportunity to read and correct proofs, but if they fail to return them by the date set on the proofs, production and publication may proceed without the Author(s)'s approval of proofs.
2. The CJS will publish this article pursuant to this contract at its cost. CJS has the exclusive right to determine how the article will appear in the journal and elsewhere.
3. The Author(s) warrant that permission to publish the article has not been previously assigned elsewhere. The Author(s) further warrant that the contribution is original to them, except for any copyrighted material of others incorporated in it, and that the Author(s) will advise us of any material, either text or illustration, the rights for which are controlled by others. Where necessary, the Author(s) will obtain, before publication and at their expense, permission in writing from the owner of the copyright in that material for publication by us. Copies of any such permission must be submitted to CJS for our files.
4. The Author(s) further warrant that the article contains no defamatory or otherwise unlawful matter and that it makes no improper invasion of the privacy or personal rights of anyone. The Author(s) undertake that all statements in it purporting to be facts are true; and that they will advise us of any statements that might be construed as defamatory or otherwise unlawful. We may require substantive revision of the manuscript to avoid including material that may infringe rights or be defamatory or otherwise unlawful. 5. In the unlikely event of any claim, action, or proceeding based on an alleged violation of any of these warranties, we shall have the right to defend the same through counsel of our own choosing. The Author(s) agree to pay all resulting costs and damages, except that this indemnity shall not apply to any changes in the manuscript by us that were not approved by the Author(s) in advance of publication, or to any material that the Authors had warned us in advance of publication might be construed as defamatory or otherwise unlawful.
6. In order to protect both Author(s) and CJS from unauthorized use of the article, the Author(s) agree to refer to us any subsequent requests to publish it or a substantial portion thereof. If we choose to grant any such request, we will normally exact a standard fee for reprinting, the amount of this fee to be fixed by us from time to time; this fee will be divided equally with Author(s). We will accede to any request by the Author(s) to use part or all of their article in a article published under either Author(s)’s exclusive authorship or editorship, provided that acknowledgment of its first appearance is made in a manner approved by CJS, and in such cases no fee for reprinting shall be payable to us.
7. Subject to the above conditions, and in consideration of CJS undertaking to subsidize costs of publication of the article, the Author(s) assign to CJS the exclusive world rights to the article in its present, or substantially its present, form, and the parties hereto agree upon the foregoing terms for themselves and their respective executors, administrators, assigns, or successors. The Author(s) herby waive any claim for royalties and reprint fees arising from the use of their article. CJS hereby obtains the right to use the article in any future publication, including, but not limited to, publication in electronic media, issued under its auspices and to authorize others, including reproduction rights organizations such as CanCopy, to do the same.
Canadian Journal of Sociology | ISSN 1710-1123