Are parental leaves considered as work interruptions by survey respondents? A methodological note

Auteurs-es

  • Chaowen Chan McGill University
  • Dana Hamplová
  • Céline Le Bourdais McGill University

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.25336/P6V02H

Mots-clés :

Parental leave, work interruption, measurement, retrospective survey

Résumé

Parental leaves and family-related work interruptions are linked to a variety of issues, such as children’s well-being or women’s work trajectories. Yet, the measurement of periods of absence from the labour market might be imprecise, especially in retrospective surveys. To evaluate the quality of the collected information, we examine whether women who reported taking a parental leave longer than six months also mentioned a corresponding work interruption, using the 2008 Living in Canada Survey (LCS) – Pilot. Our analysis shows that nearly half of women failed to do so. We investigate the sources of the discrepancy and suggest possible avenues of change for future surveys.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Chaowen Chan, McGill University

Department of Sociology

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2012-07-05

Numéro

Vol. 39 No. 1-2 (2012): Spring/Summer

Rubrique

Articles

Licence

© Chaowen Chan, Dana Hamplová, Céline Le Bourdais 2019

Licence Creative Commons

Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

The following copyright statement applies to content published in Volumes 1 - 45 of Canadian Studies in Population.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.


Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).