Imagining a Fuller Potential for Plain Language Summaries: A Case study of Canadian Science Publishing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/cais1849Abstract
Researchers are increasingly encouraged to produce plain language summaries, but are they doing so, and do these summaries meet the expectations laid out in the guidelines for preparation? To learn more about the use of plain language summaries in scholarly communication in Canada, we conducted a case study of Canadian Science Publishing (CSP), which publishes 23 journals across a range of scientific domains. The case study reveals that while the number of authors who generate plain language summaries of their research has increased steadily since CSP introduced this option in 2016, the percentage is still relatively low. In addition, the plain language summaries that are produced show similar readability scores to the scientific abstracts. We conclude by offering a number of recommendations that CSP could implement to increase the adoption and improve the readability of plain language summaries.
References
Alderdice F., J. McNeill, T. Lasserson, F. Beller, M. Carroll, V. Hundley, J. Sunderland, D. Devane., J. Noyes, S. Key, S. Norris, J. Wyn-Davies, & M. Clarke. 2016. Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: The BRIEF randomised trial. Systematic Reviews, 5, 40 10.1186/s13643-016-0214-8 PMID:26932724
Bowker, L. 2023. De-Mystifying Translation. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003217718
Canadian Science Publishing (CSP). 2023a. “Empowered by Science: Canadian Science Publishing Strategic Plan 2018-2022,” http://blog.cdnsciencepub.com/strategic-plan/
Canadian Science Publishing (CSP). 2023b. “Author Guidelines,” Canadian Science Publishing website. https://cdnsciencepub.com/authors-and-reviewers/author-guidelines
Canadian Science Publishing (CSP). 2023c. “Writing a Plain Language Summary,” Canadian Science Publishing website. https://cdnsciencepub.com/authors-and-reviewers/writing-a-plain-language-summary
Canadian Science Publishing (CSP). 2023d. “Canadian Science Publishing,” Canadian Science Publishing Medium webpage. https://medium.com/@cdnsciencepub
Cutts, M. 2009. Oxford Guide to Plain English, 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
FitzGibbon, H., K. King, C. Piano, C. Wilk and M. Gaskarth. 2020. Where are biomedical research plain-language summaries? Health Science Reports 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.175
Maurer, M., J. E. Siegel, K. B. Firminger, J. Lowers, T. Dutta, and J. S. Chang. 2021. Lessons Learned from Developing Plain Language Summaries of Research Studies. Health Literacy Research and Practice 5(2): 155-161. https://journals.healio.com/doi/10.3928/24748307-20210524-01
Science Europe. 2022. Position statement: Science communication for greater research impact. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6645074
Stoll, M., M. Kerwer, K. Lieb, and A. Chasiotis. 2022. Plain language summaries: A systematic review of theory, guidelines and empirical research. PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268789 Stricker, J., A. Chasiotis, M. Kerwer and A. Günther. 2020. Scientific abstracts and plain language summaries in psychology: A comparison based on readability indices. PLoS ONE 15(4): e0231160. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231160
UNESCO. 2021. Recommendation on Open Science. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lynne Bowker
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.