Imagining a Fuller Potential for Plain Language Summaries: A Case study of Canadian Science Publishing

Authors

  • Lynne Bowker University of Ottawa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/cais1849

Abstract

Researchers are increasingly encouraged to produce plain language summaries, but are they doing so, and do these summaries meet the expectations laid out in the guidelines for preparation? To learn more about the use of plain language summaries in scholarly communication in Canada, we conducted a case study of Canadian Science Publishing (CSP), which publishes 23 journals across a range of scientific domains. The case study reveals that while the number of authors who generate plain language summaries of their research has increased steadily since CSP introduced this option in 2016, the percentage is still relatively low. In addition, the plain language summaries that are produced show similar readability scores to the scientific abstracts. We  conclude by offering a number of recommendations that CSP could implement to increase the adoption and improve the readability of plain language summaries.

References

Alderdice F., J. McNeill, T. Lasserson, F. Beller, M. Carroll, V. Hundley, J. Sunderland, D. Devane., J. Noyes, S. Key, S. Norris, J. Wyn-Davies, & M. Clarke. 2016. Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: The BRIEF randomised trial. Systematic Reviews, 5, 40 10.1186/s13643-016-0214-8 PMID:26932724

Bowker, L. 2023. De-Mystifying Translation. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003217718

Canadian Science Publishing (CSP). 2023a. “Empowered by Science: Canadian Science Publishing Strategic Plan 2018-2022,” http://blog.cdnsciencepub.com/strategic-plan/

Canadian Science Publishing (CSP). 2023b. “Author Guidelines,” Canadian Science Publishing website. https://cdnsciencepub.com/authors-and-reviewers/author-guidelines

Canadian Science Publishing (CSP). 2023c. “Writing a Plain Language Summary,” Canadian Science Publishing website. https://cdnsciencepub.com/authors-and-reviewers/writing-a-plain-language-summary

Canadian Science Publishing (CSP). 2023d. “Canadian Science Publishing,” Canadian Science Publishing Medium webpage. https://medium.com/@cdnsciencepub

Cutts, M. 2009. Oxford Guide to Plain English, 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

FitzGibbon, H., K. King, C. Piano, C. Wilk and M. Gaskarth. 2020. Where are biomedical research plain-language summaries? Health Science Reports 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.175

Maurer, M., J. E. Siegel, K. B. Firminger, J. Lowers, T. Dutta, and J. S. Chang. 2021. Lessons Learned from Developing Plain Language Summaries of Research Studies. Health Literacy Research and Practice 5(2): 155-161. https://journals.healio.com/doi/10.3928/24748307-20210524-01

Science Europe. 2022. Position statement: Science communication for greater research impact. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6645074

Stoll, M., M. Kerwer, K. Lieb, and A. Chasiotis. 2022. Plain language summaries: A systematic review of theory, guidelines and empirical research. PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268789 Stricker, J., A. Chasiotis, M. Kerwer and A. Günther. 2020. Scientific abstracts and plain language summaries in psychology: A comparison based on readability indices. PLoS ONE 15(4): e0231160. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231160

UNESCO. 2021. Recommendation on Open Science. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en

Downloads

Published

2024-09-10

How to Cite

Bowker, L. (2024). Imagining a Fuller Potential for Plain Language Summaries: A Case study of Canadian Science Publishing. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS Actes Du congrès Annuel De l’ACSI. https://doi.org/10.29173/cais1849

Issue

Section

Articles