Epistemic Injustice In Library Work: A Case Study Of Patron-perpetrated Sexual Harassment

Authors

  • Tami Oliphant University of Alberta
  • Danielle Allard University of Alberta
  • Angela Lieu University of Alberta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/cais1875

Abstract

We draw on the concept of epistemic injustice to understand (1) how library workers are harmed in their capacity as knowers when their experiences of patron-perpetrated sexual harassment (PPSH) are not believed; and (2) how a lack of hermeneutical resources—the conceptual knowledge to name and identify PPSH as gender-based violence—makes it difficult for them to make sense of their experiences. Library workers are subject to epistemic injustice when their knowledge/truth claims about PPSH are dismissed, diminished, disbelieved or otherwise discounted by patrons and people in the library organization, often in favour of the perpetrator’s account. Recognizing epistemic injustice within the context of PPSH can help the library workplace move towards justice.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-14

How to Cite

Oliphant, T., Allard, D., & Lieu, A. (2024). Epistemic Injustice In Library Work: A Case Study Of Patron-perpetrated Sexual Harassment. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS Actes Du congrès Annuel De l’ACSI. https://doi.org/10.29173/cais1875

Issue

Section

Articles