The Third Mind Classification System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/cais1964Abstract
Is it possible to remove the inherent bias of the Library of Congress Classification System? The organisation structures that dictate how knowledge is presented in the library carry a degree of power in how library patrons perceive knowledge about themselves and one another, but these systems carry inherent biases which can cause harm to patrons. Through a synthesis of the reparative goals of Critical classification and traditions of experimental Avant grade literature this experimental classification schema attempts to challenge the biases of conscious input from cataloguing by creating a Cut-Up method classification system governed by the principle of chance.
References
Adler, M. (2020), “Afterward: The Strangeness of Subject Cataloguing”, Library Trends, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 549-556. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2020.0005
Adler, M. & Tennis, J. (2013), “Toward a Taxonomy of Harm in Knowledge Organization Systems”, Knowledge Organization, Vol 40, No. 4.
https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2013-4-266
Burroughs, W. and Gysin, B. (1978), The Third Mind, New York, Viking Press.
Deng, S. & Davidian, C. (2021), “Embracing Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) in Library Cataloguing”, Technical Services Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 315-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2021.1934315
Ford, S. (1999), Wreckers of Civilisation: The Story of COUM Transmissions and Throbbing Gristle, London, Black Dog Publications.
Martin, J. (2021), “Records, Responsibility, and Power: An Overview of Cataloguing Ethics.” Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, Vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 281-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1871458
Robinson, E. (2011), Shift Linguals: Cut-up Narratives from William S. Burroughs to the Present, New York, Rodopi.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alec Mullender

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.