La comparaison des systèmes de classification des disciplines
Approches et considérations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/cais1990Abstract
Dans la perspective de bâtir ultérieurement un outil permettant une visualisation de différents systèmes de classification des disciplines, cette étude présente une perspective globale de la recherche portant sur ces systèmes ainsi que différentes approches méthodologiques utilisées pour comprendre les connexions et identifier le potentiel d’interopérabilité entre les systèmes de classifications.
References
Aboelela, S., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S., Haas, J. et Gebbie, K. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42(1), 329-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475- 6773.2006.00621.x
Bowker, G. C. et Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001
Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475
Grant, M. J. et Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91‑108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Hruschka, D. J., Schwartz, D., St.John, D. C., Picone-Decaro, E., Jenkins, R. A. et Carey, J. W. (2004). Reliability in coding open-ended data: Lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods, 16(3), 307-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X04266540
Ninkov, A. B., Gregory, K., Jambor, M., Garza, K., Strecker, D., Schabinger, R., Peters. I. et Haustein, S. (2022). Mapping metadata: Improving dataset discipline classification. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6948238
Rao, S. X., Egger, P. H. et Zhang, C. (2023). Hierarchical classification of research fields in the « Web of Science » using deep learning. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00390
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.
Sile, L., Guns, R., Vandermoere, F., Sivertsen, G. et Engels, T. (2021). Tracing the context in disciplinary classifications: A bibliometric pairwise comparison of five classifications of journals in the social sciences and humanities. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 65‑88. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00110
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Constance Poitras, Anton Boudreau Ninkov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
