The Implications of Legitimacy: Why Shia Muslims are Disproportionately Marginalized by the Islamic State

Authors

  • Mason Pich University of Alberta

Abstract

History has shown that Shia Muslims are enemies of the Islamic State [IS], despite IS claiming to represent all Muslims. This contradiction is investigated within this paper, critically analyzing how the notion of takfir has been used to legitimize the discrimination which disproportionately affects Shia Muslims. Using a historiographical method, this paper will demonstrate where the takfir of Shi’ites stems from, finding its roots in the de-Ba’athification policies of the United States of America, the disenfranchisement of Sunni Muslims in Iraq under the Coalitional Provisional Authority, and the poverty that swept through the Iraqi civilian population. These factors led to a vulnerable population who were able to be deceived by the genocidal ideas of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Abu Ali al-Anbari who promised a better future. This history, strewn from the early 2000s to the rise of the IS, paints a picture as to how Shias were made one of the primary enemies of the IS.

A projection of the world map in white on a purple background with the title "Political Science Undergraduate Review" above the North Pole. Underneath the southern hemisphere where the Antarctic would be, "Volume IX" is written and underneath reads "University of Alberta Department of Political Science".

Downloads

Published

2024-10-07

How to Cite

Pich, M. (2024). The Implications of Legitimacy: Why Shia Muslims are Disproportionately Marginalized by the Islamic State. Political Science Undergraduate Review, 9(1). Retrieved from https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/psur/index.php/psur/article/view/374