Woven Narratives: A Craft Encounter with Tapestry Weaving in a Residential Aged Care Facility
Keywords:tapestry weaving, studio craft, participatory art, creativity, residential aged care facility
For six months, a tapestry artist/researcher moved her studio into an aged care home to conduct a participatory art project. Drawing on ethnographic-based qualitative approaches, narrative inquiry and researcher-generated photographs, this arts-based research textually and visually documents the impact of introducing the studio-based craft activity of participatory tapestry weaving into an aged care environment. As well as highlighting the joy of creative collaboration and of learning a new skill, this project explores how tapestry weaving facilitated the understanding of the participants’ worlds through stories and reminiscence. This paper also disseminates that craft, as a practice and method, connects materials, ideas and people through engagement, and facilitates wellbeing. Given rapid population ageing, and the fear and stigma surrounding aged care homes, this paper argues that craft practice might help demystify and connect aged care with the broader community, as well as enhancing residents’ quality of life.
Adeniji-Neil, D., Concannon-Gibney, T., & Weida, C. (2014). Craft objects and storytelling. In L. Weida (Ed.), Crafting creativity & creating craft (pp. 19-27). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publisher.
Belford, P. (2013). Catalytic clothing and tactility factory: Crafted collaborative connections. In A. Ravetz, A. Kettle & H. Felcey (Eds.), Collaboration through craft (pp. 129-143). London, UK: Bloomsbury.
Benjamin, W., & Arendt, H. (1987). Illuminations. New York: Schocken Books.
Bishop, C. (2004). Antagonism and relational aesthetics. October Magazine 110, Fall, 51-79. Retrieved from: http://www.teamgal.com/production/1701/SS04October.pdf
Black, S. (2017) Knit + resist: Placing the Pussyhat Project in the context of craft activism. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(5), 697-710.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carter, P. (2004). Material thinking: The theory and practice of creative research. Carlton, AU: Melbourne University Publishing.
Charmaz, K. (2004). Premises, principles, and practices in qualitative research: Revisiting the foundations. Qualitative Health Research, 14(7), 976-993. doi:10.1177/1049732304266795
Choi, N. G., Ransom, S., & Wyllie, R. J. (2008). Depression in older nursing home residents: The influence of nursing home environmental stressors, coping, and acceptance of group and individual therapy. Aging & Mental Health, 12(5), 536-547. doi:10.1080/13607860802343001
Clandinin, D. J., & Huber, J. (2010). Narrative inquiry. In P. Peterson, E. Baker & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp.436-441). New York: Elsevier.
Cohen, G. D. (2009). New theories and research findings on the positive influence of music and art on health with ageing. Arts & Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, 1(1), 48-62. doi:10.1080/17533010802528033
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper.
Darlaston, K. (2013). The generative loom: Tapestry in the community. Craft+Design Enquire, 4, 35-48.
Deacon, D. A., & Calvin, P. E. (2014). War imagery in women's textiles: An international study of weaving, knitting, sewing, quilting, rug making and other fabric arts. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc.
Demecs, I. P., & Miller, E. (2018, Sept. 12). Participatory art in residential aged care: A visual and interpretative phenomenological analysis of older residents’ engagement with tapestry weaving. Journal of Occupational Science. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1080/14427591.2018.1515649
Desmarais, S. (2016). Affective materials: A processual, relational, and material ethnography of creative making in community and primary care groups (Doctoral dissertation). Falmouth University, UK. Retrieved from: http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/12308/1/Desmarais%202016THESIS%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf
Dinkelmann, C. Y. (2011). Stories of belonging-A tapestry of stories. Using narrative enquiry and visual art to investigate individual and collective identity with in a residential aged care facility. In B. J. Worsfold (Ed.), Acculturating age: Approaches to cultural gerontology (pp. 117-132). Catalunya, ES: University Lleida.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Ewens, T. (2009). Notes from Moon Rain Centre by Thoma Ewens. fibreQuarterly Canada, 5(3/Fall). Retrieved from: http://www.velvethighway.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=149
Gauntlett, D. (2011). Making is connecting. The social meaning of creativity from DIY and knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Hogan, S. (2015). Mothers make art: Using participatory art to explore the transition to motherhood. Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 6(1), 23-32, doi: 10.1386/jaah.6.1.23_1
Higgs, P., & Gilleard, C. (2014). Frailty, abjection and the “othering” of the fourth age. Health Sociology Review, 23(1), 10-19.
Kant, I. (1928). The critique of judgment. (J. C. Meredith, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kenning, G. (2015). “Fiddling with threads”: Craft-based textile activities and positive well-being. Textile, 13(1), 50-65.
Kim, K. H. (2016). The creativity challenge: How we can recapture American innovation. New York: Prometheus Books.
Kim, N. (2014). Conceptual, biological and historical analyses of craft. In L. Weida (Ed.), Crafting creativity & creating craft (pp. 61-76). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publisher.
Leslie, E. (1998). Walter Benjamin: Traces of craft. Journal of Design History, 11(1), 5-13.
Lindsay, S. (n.d.). Down south: Tapestry in Australia. Retrieved from: http://americantapestryalliance.org/exhibitions/tex_ata/down-south-tapestry-in-australia/
Loi, D., & Dillon, P. (2006). Adaptive educational environments as creative spaces. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 363-381.
Frankl, V. E. (1992). Man’s search for meaning (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Fraser, A., Bungay, H., & Munn-Giddings, C. (2014). The value of the use of participatory arts activities in residential care settings to enhance the well-being and quality of life of older people: A rapid review of the literature. Arts & Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, 6(3), 266-278. doi:10.1080/17533015.2014.923008
Maidment, J., & Macfarlane, S. (2011). Older women and craft: Extending educational horizons in considering wellbeing. Social Work Education, 30(6), 700-711.
McCloskey, M. A. (1987). The first moment — Disinterested pleasure. In M. A. McCloskey, Kant’s aesthetic (pp. 29-39). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
McHugh, M. C. (2016). Experiencing flow: Creativity and meaningful task engagement for senior women. Women &Therapy, 39(3-4), 280-295.
Miller, E. (2016). Beyond Bingo? A phenomenographic exploration of leisure in aged care. Journal of Leisure Research, 48(1), 35-49.
Miller, E. & Buys, L. (2007). Predicting older Australians leisure-time physical activity: Impact of residence, retirement village vs. community, on walking, swimming, dancing and lawn bowls. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 31(3), 13-30.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (2013). Mental wellbeing of older people in care homes. Retrieved from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs50
Nolan, M. R. (1996). Developing a knowledge base in gerontological nursing: A critical appraisal. In L. Wade & K. Waters (Eds.), A textbook of gerontological nursing (pp. 210-237). London, UK: Baillière Tindall.
O’Neill, M. (2008). Transnational refugees: The transformative role of art? Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2), Art 59. Retrieved from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/403/873
Penney, C. (Ed.). (2011). Tapestry a woven narrative. London, UK: Black Dog Publishing.
Pöllӓnen, S. (2015). Elements of crafts that enhance well-being: Textile craft makers' descriptions of their leisure activity. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(1), 58-78.
Prince, D., & Butler, D. (2007). Clarity final report: Aging in place in America. Nashville, TN: Prince Market Research.
Productivity Commission. (2011). Caring for older Australians. Canberra, AU: Inquiry Report Australian Government. Retrieved from: http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/aged-care/report
Reynolds, F., & Prior, S. (2006). The role of art-making in identity maintenance: Case studies of people living with cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care, 15(4), 333-341. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00663.x
Reynolds, F. (1999). Cognitive behavioural counselling of unresolved grief through therapeutic adjustment of tapestry-making. The Arts of Psychotherapy, 26(3), 165-171.
Reynolds, F. (2000) Managing depression through needlecraft creative activities: A qualitative study. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 27(2), 107-114.
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. London, UK: Sage.
Riley, J., Corkhill, B., & Morris C. (2013). The benefits of knitting for personal and social wellbeing in adulthood: Findings from an international survey. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(2), 50-57.
Riley, J. (2008). Weaving an enhanced sense of self and a collective sense of self through creative textile‐making. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(2), 63-73. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686611
Sjoholm, J. (2018). Making bodies, making space and making memory in artistic practice. In L. Price & H. Hawkins (Eds.), Geographies of making craft and creativity (pp. 47-59). New York: Routledge.
Timonen, V., & O’Dwyer, C. (2009). Living in institutional care: Residents' experiences and coping strategies. Social Work in Health Care, 48, 597-613. doi:10.1080/00981380902791267
Tornstam, L. (1997). Gerotranscendence: The contemplative dimension of aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 11(2), 143-154.
Turney, J. (2009). The culture of knitting. Oxford, UK: Berg.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2019 Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Art/Research International agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication and the right to sublicense the Contribution, in the form in which it is published by the journal, to others under the terms and conditions of the of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) that allows others to download the work and share the work with others with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, but they cannot change the work in any way or use any part of the work commercially.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive public distribution and display of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
d. Authors wishing to include items (such as images or other media, or any creative works of others whether previously published or not) must contact the original copyright holder to obtain explicit permission to publish these items in Art/Research International. Writing permission should include: the title(s) of any copyrighted work, original place of publication if applicable, and an acknowledgement of having read Art/Research International's copyright notice. Authors are responsible for obtaining this permission and keeping it in their own records for later verification.