Book Publication as Pedagogy: Taking Learning Deep and Wide
Keywords:Self-authorship, authentic learning, transdisciplinary, critical thinking
AbstractFor students, the practice of writing, illustrating, and publishing facilitates deep learning experiences, both within and beyond the discipline for which the writing is targeted. In this case study, students created books under the umbrella of a large, transdisciplinary research project: a science-based, illustrated activity book, a children’s fiction chapter book with illustrations, an adolescent novel, and two illustrated social studies activity books. Students completed the self-directed research, wrote the narratives, created the artwork, sought the advice of outside scholars and artists, and revised with discipline-specific mentors. Data include the books, mentor notes, and student-reported learning outcomes. Data reveal broad content and pedagogical skill knowledge acquisition, knowledge synthesis, and a deep level of self-authorship.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. Washington, DC: Author.
Bean, J. (2011). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom (2nd ed.) San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Beers, K. (2000). The power of publication. Voices from the Middle, 8(1), 4-7.
Brenson, S. & Carter, G. S. (1995). Changing assessment practices in science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 182-186.
Calkins, L. M. (1991). Living between the lines. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Calkins, L. M. (1994). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Conter, R., Lumpkin, T., Poli, DB. & Stoneman, L. (2017). The dragon’s guide to plant evolution. Martinsville, VA: Virginia Museum of Natural History. Print.
Courlander, H. (1996). A treasury of African folklore: The oral literature, traditions, myths, legends, epics, tales, recollections, wisdom, sayings and humor of Africa. New York: Marlowe & Co.
Dartmouth College. (2016). Collaborative learning/learning with peers. Institute for Writing and Rhetoric. Retrieved from https://writing-speech.dartmouth.edu/teaching/first-year-writing-pedagogies-methods-design/collaborative-learninglearning-peers
Emig, J. (1988). Writing as a mode of learning. In G. Tate & E. P. J. Corbett (Eds.), The writing teacher's sourcebook (2nd ed.) (pp. 85-93.). New York: Oxford U. P.
Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(2), 122-128.
Ensio, T. C. & Boxeth, K. R. (2000). The effects of publishing on student attitude toward writing. ERIC Research Report. [ED 448 471]. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.
Feldman, A. (2015). STEAM rising: Why we need to put the arts into STEM education. Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2015/06/steam_vs_stem_why_we_need_to_put_the_arts_into_stem_education.html
Fernhaber, S. A., Albert, E. & Lupton, A. (2015). Publishing children’s books with interdisciplinary teams: Reflecting on student innovation through the lens of Tony Wagner. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 18(2), 59-72.
Finnegan, R. (2007). The oral and beyond: doing things with words in Africa. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Graham, G. (1995). Learning from art. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 35(1), 26.
Graves, D. (1984). A researcher learns to write. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Hamilton, D. (1980). Interdisciplinary writing. College English, 41(7), 780-796.
Klein, J. (2010). Creating interdisciplinary cultures: A model for strength and sustainability. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
Lawrence, D. P. (1999). The community as text: Using the community for collaborative internet research. English Journal, 89(1): 56-62.
Ljung, E., Szedeli, B., Guth, S., & Nelms, B. (1993). Publishing student writing. English Journal, 82(2), 1993, 47.
Lucey, T. A., & Laney, J. D. (2017). False echoes of the past: Using visual art to teach critical thinking about history. A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues, and Ideas, 90(1), 1-7.
McGregor, S. L. T. & Volckmann, R. (2011). Transversity. Tuscon, AZ: Integral Publishers.
McGregor, S. L. T. (2015). The Nicolescuian and Zurich approaches to transdisciplinarity. Integral Leadership Review, (April-June), 6-16.
McLeod, S. H. (1988). Strengthening programs for writing across the curriculum. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Michigan State University. (2016). Student-authored book helps professors be better teachers. Michigan State Today. Retrieved from https://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2016/student-authored-book-helps-professors-be-better-teachers/
Moore, R. (1993). Does writing about science improve learning about science? Journal of College Science Teaching, 12(4), 212-217.
Myers, M. Langheim, E., Stoneman, L. & Poli, DB. (2019, in prep).
National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13362.
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2008). Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within. Retrieved from http://nsse.iub.edu/NSSE_2008_Results/docs/withhold/NSSE2008_Results_revised_11-14-2008.pdf
Odell, L. (1980). The process of writing and the process of learning. College Composition and Communication, 31(1), 42-50.
Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2016). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.P21.org.
Poli, DB. & Stoneman, L. (2017). Drawing new boundaries: Finding the origins of dragons in Carboniferous plant fossils. Leonardo. doi: 10.1162/LEON_a_01576.
Poli, DB. & Stoneman, L. (2018). Capturing the transdisciplinary dragon: Creating a crossover natural history-art exhibit. The Atlas, 9, 44-56. doi: 10.22545/2018/00101
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Report to the President. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf
Pyle, C. M. (2000). Art as science: Scientific illustration, 1490–1670 in drawing, woodcut and copper plate. Endeavour, 24(2), 69-75.
Reynolds, J. A., Thaiss, C., Katkin, W., & Thompson, R. J. (2012). Writing-to-learn in undergraduate science education: A community-based, conceptually driven approach. CBE Life Science Educator, 11(1), 17–25. doi:10.1187/cbe.11-08-0064
Rivard, L. P. (1994). A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 969-983.
Sousanis, N. (2015). Unflattening. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stoneman, L., Poli, DB. & Dooley, A. (2015). Hunting dragons: An organic, multidisciplinary pedagogy. In B. Cozza & P. Blessinger (Eds.), University partnerships for community and school system development (pp. 259-280). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing. doi: 10.1108/S2055-364120150000005014.
Wess, R. C. (1980). Publishing student writing: An in-class model. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Washington, D.C. [Eric Reproduction Services Number ED 185 564].
Winrich, R. A. (1991). Using art to teach science. Cleveland, OH: NASA Lewis Research Center.
Yenca, K. (2014). Book creator student math authors: Take 2. MathyKathy. Retrieved from http://www.mathycathy.com/blog/author/catherine-yenca/
Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (1998). Best practices: New standards for teaching and learning in America's schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Zinsser, W. (1988). Writing to learn. New York: Harper and Row.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2019 Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Art/Research International agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication and the right to sublicense the Contribution, in the form in which it is published by the journal, to others under the terms and conditions of the of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) that allows others to download the work and share the work with others with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, but they cannot change the work in any way or use any part of the work commercially.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive public distribution and display of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
d. Authors wishing to include items (such as images or other media, or any creative works of others whether previously published or not) must contact the original copyright holder to obtain explicit permission to publish these items in Art/Research International. Writing permission should include: the title(s) of any copyrighted work, original place of publication if applicable, and an acknowledgement of having read Art/Research International's copyright notice. Authors are responsible for obtaining this permission and keeping it in their own records for later verification.