Inclusion of Librarians and Information Professionals in Canadian Knowledge Synthesis Grant Funding
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.29173/jchla29701Résumé
Introduction: Librarians are continually advocating for the expertise they can bring to knowledge synthesis research projects. Professional associations like the Canadian Health Libraries Association (CHLA) aim to promote librarians and information professionals as partners in health research. This push for representation must happen at a policy level in order to enact change. To that purpose, we explored the degree to which the inclusion of librarians and information professionals is represented at the funding level by healthcare research organizations in Canada.
Methods: We used a list of health research funding agencies generated from Scopus searches and an independent search of Canadian health research institutions, governmental health authorities, professional associations, and research-oriented universities to identify research grants designed for knowledge synthesis research. We examined these grants to determine whether they include librarians or information professionals in their eligibility criteria.
Results: Of the 14 knowledge synthesis grants we identified, only one required a medical librarian as a member of the research team in the grant eligibility criteria.
Discussion: Most knowledge synthesis grants in Canada do not require, recommend, or mention librarians or information professionals as a member of the research or authorship team. Despite evidence that librarians provide vital expertise on searching and are proven to substantially improve the quality of knowledge synthesis research projects, Canadian health research organizations do not acknowledge the skills that librarians and information professionals can bring to research projects at the funding level.
Références
Catillon M. Medical knowledge synthesis: a brief overview. [Internet] [place unknown] Harvard Business School; 2017 Nov 8 [cited 2022 Dec 5]. Available from: https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/WhitePaper-Catillon10.2017_40a6683d-411b-4621-a121-8f5e93b13605.pdf.
Uttley L, Quintana DS., Montgomery P, Carroll C, Page M J, Falzon L, Sutton A, Moher D. The problems with systematic reviews: A living systematic review. J Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2023 Feb 14 [cited 2023 Apr 10];156:30-41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.01.011.
Fire M, Guestrin C. Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart’s Law in action. Gigascience [Internet]. 2019 Jun 1 [cited 2022 Dec 5];8(6). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz053.
Kolaski K, Logan RL, Goss KD, Butler C. Quality appraisal of systematic reviews of interventions for children with cerebral palsy reveals critically low confidence. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology [Internet]. 2021 Jun 6 [cited 2023 Apr 10];63:1316-26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14949.
Ioannidis JPA. The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Milbank Q [Internet]. 2016 Sep 13 [cited 2023 Apr 10];94(3):485-514. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12210.
Salvador-Oliván JA, Marco-Cuenca G, Arquero-Avilés R. Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval. J Med Libr Assoc [Internet]. 2019 Apr 15 [cited 2023 Apr 10];107(2): 210–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.567.
Koffel JB. Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors. PLoS One [Internet]. 2015 May 4 [cited 2023 Apr 10];10(5):e0125931. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125931.
Meert D, Torabi N, Costella J. Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews. J Med Libr Assoc [Internet]. 2016 Oct [cited 2023 Apr 10];104(4):267–77. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2016.139.
Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. (2015). Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. J Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2015 Feb 5 [cited 2023 Apr 10];68(6): 617-26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025.
Schellinger J, Sewell K, Bloss JE, Ebron T, Forbes C. (2021) The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2021 Sep 1 [cited 2023 Apr 10];16(9): e0256833. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256833.
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet].Version 6.3; Online version. Chichester (UK): Cochrane; 2022 Feb [cited 2023 Apr 10]. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Tacconelli E. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Lancet Infectious Diseases [Internet]. 2010 Apr [cited 2023 Apr 10];10(4):226. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70065-7.
Aromataris E, Munn Z (editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Apr 10]. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global, https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01.
Canadian Institute of Health Research [Internet]. [place unknown]: Government of Canada; [modified 2022 Nov 28]. Knowledge synthesis - tips for success; [modified 2013 Jun 7; cited 2022 Dec 5]. Available from: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/46891.html.
Harris, MR. The librarian’s role in the systematic review process: a case study. J Med Libr Assoc [Internet]. 2005 Jan [cited 2022 Dec 5];93(1):1536-5050. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC545126/.
Monroe-Hulick A, O’Brien MS, White GW. Librarians as partners: moving from research supporters to research partners. In ACRL 2013 Proceedings [Internet]; 2013 Apr 10-13; Indianapolis, IN (USA): ACRL, 2013 Apr 13 [cited 2022 Dec 5]. P. 382-387. Available from: https://alair.ala.org/handle/11213/18112.
Desmeules R, Campbell S, Dorgan M. Acknowledging librarians’ contributions to systematic review searching. J Can Health Libr Assoc [Internet]. 2016 Aug 7 [cited 2022 Dec 5];47(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.5596/c16-014.
Canadian Health Libraries Association/Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada [Internet]. Canada Health Libraries Association; c2022. CHLA/ABSC Strategic Plan, 2018-2021; 2018 [cited 2022 Dec 2]. Available from: https://www.chla-absc.ca/strategic_plan-new.php.
Nosek B. Strategy for culture change [Internet]. [place unknown]: Center for Open Science; 2019 Jun 11 [cited 2022 Dec 5]. Available from: https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change.
Most frequent grant funding opportunities (federal and international) [Internet]. [place unknown]: Nova Scotia Health Authority; [cited 2022 Dec 2]. Available from: https://www.cdha.nshealth.ca/system/files/sites/391/documents/national-international-opportunities.pdf.
Scientific Office, Emergency Strategic Clinical Network. 2022 Systematic and scoping review grant competition: call for proposals [Internet]. Alberta Health Services; 2021 Oct 4 [cited 2022 Dec 2]. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20211007020043/https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/about/scn/ahs-scn-ems-escn-scoping-and-systematic-review-funding-call-2022.pdf.
Canadian Institute of Health Research [Internet]. [place unknown]: Government of Canada; [modified 2022 Nov 28]. Section 1: application administration; [modified 2019 Jan 7; cited 2022 Dec 6]. Available from: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/22630.html#1-D1.
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council [Internet]. [place unknown]: Government of Canada; [modified 2021 Dec 23]. Definition of terms; [modified 2021 May 4; cited 2022 Dec 6]. Available from: https://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/programs-programmes/definitions-eng.aspx.
Canadian Cancer Society [Internet]. [place unknown]: Canadian Cancer Society; 2022. Eligibility and requirements; 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 6]. Available from: https://cancer.ca/en/research/for-researchers/managing-your-grant/eligibility-and-requirements.
Public Health Agency of Canada [Internet]. [place unknown]: Government of Canada; [modified 2022 Nov 4]. Call for letter of intent: public health measures for COVID-19 response research funding opportunity; [modified 2022 Sep 26; cited 2022 Dec 6]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/funding-opportunities/grant-contribution-funding-opportunities/public-health-measures-covid-19-response-research-funding-opportunity.html#a4.
Public Health Agency of Canada [Internet]. [place unknown]: Government of Canada; 2022 [modified 2022 Nov 4]. Promoting health equity: mental health of Black Canadians initiative – knowledge mobilization network; [modified 2022 Nov 16; cited 2022 Dec 6]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/funding-opportunities/grant-contribution-funding-opportunities/promoting-health-equity-mental-health-black-canadians-fund-knowledge-mobilization-network.html#a5.
WSIB Ontario [Internet]. [place unknown]: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board; c2022. Occupational asbestos exposure and development of gastro-intestinal cancers: request for applications; 2021 Apr 19 [cited 2022 Dec 6]. Available from: https://www.wsib.ca/en/occupational-asbestos-exposure-and-development-gastro-intestinal-cancers-request-applications.
WSIB Ontario [Internet]. [place unknown]: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board; c2022. Research and grants program: proposal instructions; c2022 [cited 2022 Dec 6]. Available from: https://www.wsib.ca/en/research-and-grants-program-proposal-instructions.
WSIB Ontario [Internet]. [place unknown]: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board; c2022. Occupational exposure to allergens and irritants and the development of occupational asthma: proposal instructions; c2022 [cited 2022 Dec 6]. Available from: https://www.wsib.ca/en/occupational-exposure-allergens-and-irritants-and-development-occupational-asthma-proposal.
WorkSafe BC [Internet]. [place unknown]: WorkSafe BC; 2022. Specific priorities/systematic reviews; c2022 [cited 2022 Dec 6]. Available from: https://www.worksafebc.com/en/about-us/research-services/funding-streams/specific-priorities-research-grants.
Brander G, Pawliuk C. Research-embedded health librarians as facilitators of a multidisciplinary scoping review. J Can Health Libr Assoc [Internet]. 2017 Aug 1 [cited 2022 Dec 2];38(2):38-43. Available from: https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/jchla/index.php/jchla/article/view/29197.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Brianna Henshaw, Rachael Bradshaw, Aubrey C. Geyer 2024
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
