Cycles of Bias: Soft Censorship in Libraries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/cais1917Keywords:
Censorship, Soft censorship, Implicit bias, Libraries, Information scienceAbstract
Library professionals, often without knowing, can indirectly reduce access to information, a phenomenon known as soft censorship. This research-in-progress conceptualizes key aspects of soft censorship and identifies conditions conducive to soft censorship in libraries. The individual and systematic biases that form the cycles that facilitate soft censorship become evident through this conceptualization, including content warnings, neutrality, subject headings, hiring, and publishing. In future work, we will analyze other areas where soft censorship has the potential to proliferate, including acquisitions, weeding, and reference, to obtain a fuller picture of soft censorship.
Les cycles du biais : la censure subtile dans les bibliothèques
Résumé
Les bibliothécaires, souvent sans le savoir, peuvent indirectement réduire l'accès à l'information, un phénomène connu sous le nom de censure subtile. Cette recherche en cours conceptualise les aspects clés de la censure subtile et identifie les conditions favorables à celle-ci dans les bibliothèques. Les biais individuels et systémiques qui forment les cycles facilitant la censure subtile deviennent évidents à travers la conceptualisation, en incluant les avertissements de contenu, la neutralité, les titres et sous-titres, l'embauche et la publication. Dans un projet de recherche futur, nous analyserons d'autres sphères où la censure subtile a le potentiel de proliférer, en incluant les acquisitions, la pré-sélection et la référence, afin d'obtenir une image plus complète de la censure subtile.
Mots-clés
Censure; Censure subtile; Biais implicite; Bibliothèques; Science de l'information
References
Al Ashry, M. (2023). Arab Authorities Use Digital Surveillance to Control Press Freedom: Journalists’ Perceptions. Digital Policy Regulation and Governance, 25(3), 250 266. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-05-2021-0071
Antelman, K. (2023). Content Warnings and Censorship. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 23(3), 461 484. Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA). https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2023.a901564
Barité, M. (2018). Literary Warrant. KO Knowledge Organization, 45(6), 517 536. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-6-517
Bullard, J., Watson, B., & Purdome, C. (2022). Misrepresentation in the Surrogate: Author Critiques of “Indians of North America” Subject Headings. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 60(6 7), 599 619. Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA). https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2022.2090039
Cooke, N. A., & Harris, C. N. (2023). The Softer Side of Censorship. Journal of Intellectual Freedom and Privacy, 8(1), 4 9. Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA).
Curry, A. (1997). The Limits of Tolerance: Censorship and Intellectual Freedom in Public Libraries. The Scarecrow Press; WorldCat.
Langan, K. A. (2021). The Library Language Game: Information Literacy through the Lens of Wittgenstein’s Language Games. Communications in Information Literacy, 15(1), 104-118,104A. Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA). https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.9
Leonard, E. (2019). Career Conversations: Disability and Hiring. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 58(4), 202 204. Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA). https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.58.4.7144">10.5860/rusq.58.4.7144
Macdonald, S., & Birdi, B. (2020). The Concept of Neutrality: A New Approach. Journal of Documentation, 76(1), 333 353. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2019-0102
Panievsky, A. (2021). Covering Populist Media Criticism: When Journalists’ Professional Norms Turn Against Them. International Journal of Communication, 15, 2136 2155.
Price, A. C. (2022). Barriers to an Inclusive Academic Library Collection. Collection and Curation, 41(3), 97 100. Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA). https://doi.org/10.1108/CC-05-2021-0018
Spyers-Duran, P., Deng, S., Dovydaitis, A., Piascik, J., & Shrauger, K. (2022). Juvenile Biography Collection: EDI Analysis and Enhancement. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 60(8), 836 857. Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA). https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2022.2134246
VandeBurgt, M. M., Rodgers, B. M., & Brown, K. (2021). Testimonies: The Rewards and Challenges of Letting Their Voices Be Heard. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 1. Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102420
Zhong, Z., Wang, T., & Huang, M. (2017). Does the Great Fire Wall Cause Self-Censorship? The Effects of Perceived Internet Regulation and the Justification of Regulation. Internet Research, 27(4), 974 990. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-07-2016-0204
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adelaide Tracey, Anton Boudreau Ninkov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


