Research Productivity and Its Relationship to Library Collections

Authors

  • Sandra L. De Groote University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1862-188X
  • Beyza Aksu Dunya University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America; Bartin University, Turkey
  • Jung Mi Scoulas University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
  • Mary M. Case University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29736

Abstract

Objective – The purpose of this study was to explore in the current academic library environment, the relationship between library collections data (collections’ size, expenditures, and usage) and faculty productivity (scholarly output). The researchers also examined the degree to which new and existing library metrics predict faculty productivity.

Methods – Demographic data (e.g., faculty size, student size, research and development expenditures), library budget data (e.g., collection expenditures), collection use data (e.g., full-text article requests and database searches), and publication output for 81 doctoral granting universities in the United States were collected to explore potential relationships between research productivity, collection use, library budgets, collection size, and research expenditures using partial correlations. A hierarchical multiple regression was also used to ascertain the significance of certain predictors of research productivity (publications).

Results – A correlation existed between the number of publications (research productivity) and library expenditures (total library expenditures, total library material expenditures, and ongoing library resource expenditures), collection size (volumes, titles, and ebooks), use of collection (full-text article requests and total number of references in the articles), and research and development expenditures. Another key finding from the hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed that full-text article requests were the best predictor of research productivity, which uniquely explained 10.2% of the variation in publication.

Conclusion – The primary findings were that full-text article requests, followed by library material expenditures and research expenditures, were found to be the best predictor of research productivity as measured by articles published.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sandra L. De Groote, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America

Professor and Head of Assessment and Scholarly Communications

Beyza Aksu Dunya, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America; Bartin University, Turkey

Clinical Assistant Professor

Jung Mi Scoulas, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America

Clinical Assistant Professor and Assessment Coordinator

Mary M. Case, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America

University Librarian and Dean of Libraries

Downloads

Published

2020-12-15 — Updated on 2020-12-16

Versions

How to Cite

De Groote, S. L., Aksu Dunya, B., Scoulas, J. M., & Case, M. M. (2020). Research Productivity and Its Relationship to Library Collections. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 15(4), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29736 (Original work published December 15, 2020)

Issue

Section

Research Articles