Re-Purposing the Physical Space of an Academic Library in the Digital Era: A Case Study of Jawaharlal Nehru University and Delhi University, New Delhi (India)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29976Abstract
Objectives – The issue/return of books and other reading materials available on shelves in academic libraries has declined. Round-the-clock availability of information resources, high-speed internet, cheaper cost of data download, laptops, and smartphones are some of the reasons behind decreased usage of print reading materials. Users are spending more time studying, accessing e-resources, socializing with friends, and discussing with peer groups in the library building. Libraries in developed countries have already recognized the need of the hour and redesigned their spaces to create a variety of reading spaces, creative spaces, quiet spaces, and so forth in the existing building. But the libraries of the higher education institutions in India have not considered the users' needs concerning the library space. No such study has been conducted at large universities in India. This study was conducted with library users of the central library of two large universities located in New Delhi to find users' opinions and views to re-purpose the library space to meet users' needs.
Methods – The survey method has been used to understand the use of the existing format of knowledge resources and the need of library users. The central point of the research questionnaire is to optimize the library space of the central libraries of the universities under study. Printed questionnaires were distributed to the users present in the reading halls of the libraries at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi, and Delhi University (DU), New Delhi, and online questionnaires were distributed to faculty members. The collected data were analyzed with Microsoft Excel, and various hypotheses were tested using non-parametric tests such as the sign test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis test.
Results – Students and research scholars visit daily and spend more than four hours in the library building. They use their time in study, accessing e-resources in the reading halls of the library more than any other place. The users opined the reading halls should have wi-fi facilities, a power source to charge laptops and mobile phones, washrooms near every reading hall, a quiet reading space, and a clean ambient environment for long hours of study in the library building.
Conclusion – Library users in the 21st century want more physical space to study, concentrate, socialize, and learn in the informal learning environment. They need library space with the latest infrastructure to connect to the digital world to retrieve study materials and print copies of study materials. Educational institutions should create more varied reading spaces for serious reading, pleasure reading, in-depth reading, and interactive learning spaces in new library buildings.
Downloads
References
Andrews, C., Downs, A., Morris-Knower, J., Pacion, K., & Wright, S. E. (2016). From "library as place” to “library as platform”: Redesigning the 21st century academic library. 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0732-067120160000036006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0732-067120160000036006
Applegate, R. (2009). The library is for studying: Student preferences for study space. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(4), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2009.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2009.04.004
Chaddha, K & Kanjilal, U. (2022). Transforming academic libraries into information commons: A proposed model. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 17(1), 6-33. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30004
Choy, F. C., & Goh, S. N. (2016). A framework for planning academic library spaces. Library Management, 37(1/2), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-01-2016-0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-01-2016-0001
Freeman, G. T. (2017, January 4). The library as place: Changes in learning patterns, collections, technology, and use. CLIR. Retrieved September 5, 2022, from https://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub129/freeman/
Gayton, J. T. (2008). Academic libraries: “Social” or “communal?” The nature and future of academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.11.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.11.011
Gibson, A. N., & Kaplan, S. (2017). Place, community and information behavior: Spatially oriented information seeking zones and information source preferences. Library & Information Science Research, 39(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.03.001
Hall, K., & Kapa, D. (2015). Silent and independent: Student use of academic library study space. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v10i1.3338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v10i1.3338
Hegde, A., Boucher, P., & Lavelle, A. (2018). How do you work? Understanding user needs for responsive study space design. College & Research Libraries, 79(7), 895–915. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.7.895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.7.895
Webb, K.M., Schaller, M.A., & Hunley, S.A. (2008). Measuring library space use and preferences: Charting a path toward increased engagement. portal: Libraries and the Academy 8(4), 407-422. http://doi.org/10.1353/pla.0.0014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.0.0014
Li, L. H., Wu, F., & Su, B. (2018). Impacts of library space on learning satisfaction – An empirical study of University Library Design in Guangzhou, China. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(6), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.10.003
Musoke, M. G. N. (2008). Strategies for addressing the university library users’ changing needs and practices in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(6), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.10.002
Norton, H. F., Butson, L. C., Tennant, M. R., & Botero, C. E. (2013). Space planning: A renovation saga involving library users. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 32(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2013.776879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2013.776879
Ozburn, L., Kirk, J., & Eastman, T. (2020). Creating collaborative library spaces through partnerships with campus organizations. Journal of Library Administration, 60(6), 600–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1748432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1748432
Ranganathan, S. R. (1931). The Five Laws of Library Science. Madras Library Association (Madras, India) and Edward Goldston (London, UK). http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105454
Spencer, M. E. & Watstein, S. B. (2017). Academic library spaces: Advancing student success and helping students thrive. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 17(2), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2017.0024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2017.0024
Stemmer, J., & Strawser, M. G. (2019). Silence in a noisy world: Using student feedback to enhance library silent study space. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(3), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29581
Stewart, Christopher. (2009). The academic library building in the digital age: A study of new library construction and planning, design, and use of new library space. Dissertation available from ProQuest.
Zabel, D., & Rimland, E. (2007). Ranganathan’s relevant rules. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 46(4), 24–26. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.46n4.24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.46n4.24
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sushanta Panigrahi, Prabhat Kumar Sangal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License 4.0 International applies to all works published by Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. Authors will retain copyright of the work.
