Developing a Library Association Membership Survey: Challenges and Promising Themes




Objective – Many of us involved in the library and information sector are members of associations that represent the interests of our profession. These associations are often key to enabling us to provide evidence based practice by offering opportunities such as professional development. We invest resources in membership so we must be able to inform those in charge about our needs, expectations, and level of satisfaction. Governing bodies and committees, therefore, need a method to capture these views and plan strategy accordingly. The committee of the Health Sciences Libraries Group (HSLG) of the Library Association of Ireland wanted to enable members to give their views on the group, to understand what aspects of a library association are important to librarians in Ireland, and to learn about the reasons for and against membership.

Methods – Surveys are a useful way of obtaining evidence to inform policy and practice. Although relatively quick to produce, their design and dissemination can pose challenges. The HSLG committee developed an online survey questionnaire for members and non-members (anyone eligible to join our library association). We primarily used multiple choice, matrix, and contextual/demographic questions, with skip logic enabling choices of relevance to respondents. Our literature review provided guidance in questionnaire design and suggested four themes that we used to develop options and to analyse results.

Results – The survey was made available for two weeks and we received 49 eligible responses. Analysis of results and reflection on the process suggested aspects that we would change in terms of the language used in our questionnaire and dissemination methods. There were also aspects that show good potential, including the four themes that were used to understand what matters to members: expertise (professional development), community (connecting and engaging), profession (sustaining and strengthening), and support (financial and organizational supports). Overall, our survey provided rich data that met our objectives.

Conclusion – It is essential that those who are governing any group make evidence based decisions, and a well-planned survey can support this. Our article outlines the elements of our questionnaire and process that didn’t work, and those that show promise. We hope that lessons learned will help anyone planning a survey, particularly associations who wish to ascertain the views of their members and others who are eligible to join. With some proposed modifications, our questionnaire could provide a template for future study in this area.


Download data is not yet available.


Agee, J., & Lillard, L. (2005). A global view of library associations for students and new librarians. New Library World, 106(11/12), 541–555. DOI:

Ahmadian Yazdi, F., & Deshpande, N. J. (2013). Evaluation of selected library associations’ web sites. Aslib Proceedings, 65(2), 92–108. DOI:

American Library Association. (2020, February 14). ALA responds to financial situation [Press release].

Ball, H. L. (2019). Conducting online surveys. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(3), 413–417. DOI:

Bradley, F., Dalby, A., & Spencer, A. (2009). Our space: Professional development for new graduates and professionals in Australia. IFLA Journal, 35(3), 232–242. DOI:

Broady‐Preston, J. (2006). CILIP: A twenty‐first century association for the information profession? Library Management, 27(1/2), 48–65. DOI:

Care Quality Commission. (2015). NHS patient survey programme: Survey scoring method.

Chase, S. (2019). Why join a professional association? Public Libraries, 58(5), 8–11.

Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. (n.d.-a). A definition of libraries, information and knowledge as a ‘profession.’ Retrieved April 24, 2022, from

Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. (n.d.-b). Be part of your profession. Retrieved April 24, 2022, from

Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. (n.d.-c). We are CILIP: 5 year action plan.

Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. (n.d.-d). We are here for you. Retrieved April 24, 2022, from

Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. (n.d.-e). Why become professionally registered? Retrieved June 5, 2022, from

Corcoran, M., & McGuinness, C. (2014). Keeping ahead of the curve: Academic librarians and continuing professional development in Ireland. Library Management, 35(3), 175–198. DOI:

Davidson, J. R., & Middleton, C. A. (2006). Networking, networking, networking: The role of professional association memberships in mentoring and retention of science librarians. Science & Technology Libraries, 27(1–2), 203–224. DOI:

DiMauro, V. (2011). Using online communities in professional associations. Information Outlook, 15(4), 18–20.

Dowling, M., & Fiels, K. M. (2009). Global roles of library associations. In I. Abdullahi (Ed.), Global library and information science (pp. 564–577). K. G. Saur. DOI:

Fink, A., & Kosecoff, J. B. (1998). How to conduct surveys: A step by step guide (2nd ed). Sage Publications.

Frank, D. G. (1997). Activity in professional associations: The positive difference in a librarian’s career. Library Trends, 46(2), 307–319.

French, J. (2012). Designing and using surveys as research and evaluation tools. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 43(3), 187–192. DOI:

Garrison, B., & Cramer, S. M. (2021). What librarians say they want from their professional associations: A survey of business librarians. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 26(1–2), 81–98. DOI:

Granikov, V., Hong, Q. N., Crist, E., & Pluye, P. (2020). Mixed methods research in library and information science: A methodological review. Library & Information Science Research, 42(1), 101003. DOI:

Henczel, S. (2014). The impact of library associations: Preliminary findings of a qualitative study. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 15(3), 122–144. DOI:

Henczel, S. (2016a). The impact of national library associations on their members, employing organisations and the profession. [Doctoral dissertation, RMIT University]. RMIT University Research Repository.

Henczel, S. (2016b). Understanding the impact of national library association membership: Strengthening the profession for sustainability. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 5(2), 277–285.

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (n.d.). Library map of the world. Retrieved June 4, 2022, from

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2016a). Building strong library associations programme manual.

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2016b). Building strong library associations. Annex 16: Member and non-member survey–start of programme.

Joint, N. (2007). Newly qualified librarians and their professional associations: UK and US comparisons: ANTAEUS. Library Review, 56(9), 767–772. DOI:

Kamm, S. (1997). To join or not to join: How librarians make membership decisions about their associations. Library Trends, 46(2), 295–306.

Lachance, J. R. (2006). Learning, community give library and information associations a bright future. Library Management, 27(1/2), 6–13. DOI:

Library and Information Association of New Zealand Aotearoa. (n.d.). Professional registration. Retrieved June 4, 2022, from

Library Association of Ireland. (2012). Memorandum and articles of association of Cumann Leabharlann na hÉireann (The Library Association of Ireland).

Librarianship Studies & Information Technology. (2020, July 11). Library associations.

Lumpkin, J. (2016). #Why membership? Professional associations in the Millennial Age: A call to action through mentorship. OLA Quarterly, 21(3), 5–7. DOI:

Meadows, K. A. (2003). So you want to do research? 5: Questionnaire design. British Journal of Community Nursing, 8(12), 562–570. DOI:

Morrison, H. (2004). Professional library & information associations should rise to the challenge of promoting open access and lead by example. Library Hi Tech News, 21(4), 8–10. DOI:

National Care Experience Programme. (n.d.). Survey hub. Retrieved March 13, 2022, from

Nayak, M. S. D. P., & Narayan, K. A. (2019). Strengths and weaknesses of online surveys. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 24(5).

Sauceda, J. (2018). MLA personnel characteristics, 2016: Continuity, change, and concerns. Notes: The Quarterly Journal of the Music Library Association, 359–371. DOI:

Schilperoort, H., Quezada, A., & Lezcano, F. (2021). Words matter: Interpretations and implications of “para” in paraprofessional. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(1), 13–22. DOI:

Schwartz, A. (2016, October). Why join a library association?

Spaulding, K., & Maloney, A. (2017, June 18–20). The impact of professional associations on the careers of LIS professionals [Paper presentation]. Special Libraries Association 2017 Annual Conference, Phoenix, AZ, United States.

Streatfield, D., & Markless, S. (2019). Impact evaluation and IFLA: Evaluating the impact of three international capacity building initiatives. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 20(2), 105–122. DOI:

Thomas, V. K., Satpathi, C., & Satpathi, J. N. (2010). Emerging challenges in academic librarianship and role of library associations in professional updating. Library Management, 31(8/9), 594–609. DOI:

Wise, M. (2012). Participation in local library associations: The benefits to participants. PNLA Quarterly, 77(1), 50–56.




How to Cite

Dunne, M. (2022). Developing a Library Association Membership Survey: Challenges and Promising Themes . Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 17(3), 3–36.



Research Articles