A Survey of Public Library-Led Digital Literacy Training in Canada: Perceptions of Administrators and Instructors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30553Abstract
Objective – This paper presents the results from a survey of administrators and instructors at public libraries across Canada investigating the delivery of digital literacy training led by public libraries. The goal of the survey was to capture a snapshot of the Canadian public library-led digital literacy training landscape and to explore differences in perceptions of training activities between public library administrators and instructors.
Methods – An online survey was distributed to administrators and instructors at public libraries across Canada with the help of two national public library associations. The survey instrument was developed based on a theoretical framework from the research team’s prior case study investigations of community-led digital literacy training. The survey included closed- and open-ended questions concerning the availability of adequate/sustained funding, the adequacy of dedicated classroom resources, the competency of teaching staff, the helpfulness of support staff, the amount and frequency of knowledge sharing of best practices, the amount of rigorous and regular performance measurement, the scheduling of the training provided, the skills taught, the pedagogical approaches used, and the marketing carried out. Responses were analyzed using both quantitative and qualitative data analysis techniques.
Results – Public library administrators and instructors in Canada are generally satisfied with the delivery of digital literacy training; however, room for improvement exists. Instructors are more positive about the delivery of this training than administrators. Findings support and extend the research team’s conceptual model, specifically in terms of providing more insight and clarity on how the learning environment and program components affect the delivery of digital literacy training led by public libraries. Results highlight how training is situated in context and how libraries need to fine-tune the delivery of this training in ways that are reflective of libraries’ learning environments and program components.
Conclusion – Results are of high interest to researchers and library practitioners who wish to leverage evidence-based library and information practice to understand and address the factors affecting the successful delivery of public library-led digital literacy training. Though funding is always an obstacle for any public service organization, libraries can make improvements to the delivery of their training in other ways, such as carrying out more robust performance measurement and using results more transparently, participating in more knowledge-sharing opportunities, and better understanding learner needs and preferences.
Downloads
References
Abdelaal, N., & Andrey, S. (2022). Overcoming digital divides: What we heard and recommendations. Ryerson Leadership Lab. https://dais.ca/reports/overcoming-digital-divides/
Andrey, S., Masoodi, M. J., Malli, N., & Dorkenoo, S. (2021). Mapping Toronto’s digital divide. Ryerson Leadership Lab and Brookfield Institute for Innovation + Entrepreneurship. https://dais.ca/reports/mapping-torontos-digital-divide/
Barrie, H., La Rose, T., Detlor, B., Julien, H., & Serenko, A. (2021). “Because I’m old”: The role of ageism in older adults’ experiences of digital literacy training in public libraries. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 39(4), 379–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2021.1962477 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2021.1962477
Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In C. Lankshear, & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies, and practices (pp. 17–32). Peter Lang.
Boyer, C. M., & Ewell, P. T. (1988). State-based case studies of assessment initiatives in undergraduate education: Chronology of critical points. Education Commission of the States.
Brown, J. S. (2006). New learning environments for the 21st century: Exploring the edge. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 38(5), 18–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.38.5.18-24
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
Bush, O. (2024). Public library statistics in Canada. Made in CA. https://madeinca.ca/public-library-statistics-canada/
Detlor, B., Julien, H., La Rose, T., & Serenko, A. (2022). Community‐led digital literacy training: Toward a conceptual framework. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 73(10), 1387–1400. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24639
Detlor, B., Julien, H., Willson, R., Serenko, A., & Lavallee, M. (2011). Learning outcomes of information literacy instruction at business schools. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(3), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21474
Elfert, M. (2019). Lifelong learning in Sustainable Development Goal 4: What does it mean for UNESCO’s rights-based approach to adult learning and education? International Review of Education, 65(4), 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09788-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09788-z
Elgamal, R., La Rose, T., Detlor B., Julien, H., & Serenko, A. (2024). A community partnership approach to digital literacy training for older adults between public libraries and seniors’ organizations. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 47(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v47i1.16593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v47i1.16593
Horrigan, J. B. (2015). Libraries at the crossroads. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/09/15/libraries-at-the-crossroads/
Huynh, A., & Malli, N. (2018). Levelling up: The quest for digital literacy. Brookfield Institute for Innovation + Entrepreneurship. https://dais.ca/reports/levelling-up/
Julien, H. (2018). Digital literacy in theory and practice. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (4th ed., pp. 2243–2252). IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.ch195
Julien, H., Gerstle D., Detlor, B., La Rose, T., & Serenko, A. (2021). Digital literacy training for Canadians. Part I: “It’s just core public works.” Library Quarterly, 91(4), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1086/715918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/715918
Julien, H., Gerstle D., Detlor, B., La Rose, T., & Serenko, A. (2022). Digital literacy training for Canadians. Part II: Defining and measuring success. Library Quarterly, 92(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1086/717233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/717233
Kurt, S. (2021, February 17). Situated learning theory. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/situated-learning-theory/
Lave, J. (2009). The practice of learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning (1st ed., pp. 200–208). Routledge.
Lindauer, B.G. (2004). The three arenas of information literacy assessment. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 44(2), 122–129.
Manžuch, Z., & Macevičiūtė, E. (2020). Getting ready to reduce the digital divide: Scenarios of Lithuanian public libraries. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(10), 1205–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24324
Marín, V. I., & Castaneda, L. (2022). Developing digital literacy for teaching and learning. In O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of open, distance and digital education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_64-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_64-1
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
Nordicity. (2018). Technology access in public libraries: Outcomes and impacts for Ontario communities. Toronto Public Library. https://www.torontopubliclibrary.ca/content/bridge/pdfs/nordicity-full-report.pdf
Public Library Association (2024). Digital literacy. American Library Association. Retrieved June 2024, from http://www.ala.org/pla/initiatives/digitalliteracy
Serenko, A., Detlor, B., Julien, H., & Booker, L. (2012). A model of student learning outcomes of information literacy instruction in a business school. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(4), 671–686. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22606
Sims, S. J. (1992). Student outcomes assessment: A historical review and guide to program development. Greenwood Press.
Smythe, S., Wilbur, A., & Hunter, E. (2021). Inventive pedagogies and social solidarity: The work of community‑based adult educators during COVID‑19 in British Columbia, Canada. International Review of Education, 67(1–2), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-021-09882-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-021-09882-1
Wynia Baluk, K., Detlor, B., La Rose, T., & Alfaro-Laganse, C. (2023). Exploring the digital literacy needs and training preferences of older adults living in affordable housing. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 41(3), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2023.2239310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2023.2239310
Wynia Baluk, K., McQuire, S., Gillett, J., & Wyatt, D. (2021). Aging in a digital society: Exploring how Canadian and Australian public library systems program for older adults. Public Library Quarterly, 40(6), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2020.1811612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2020.1811612
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Brian Detlor, Alexander Serenko, Tara La Rose, Heidi Julien
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License 4.0 International applies to all works published by Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. Authors will retain copyright of the work.
